Isu-Isu Kritis Historiografi di Era Digital: Analisis Narasi Sejarah pada Media Sosial Critical Issues of Historiography in the Digital Era: Analysis of Historical Narratives on Social Media

Main Article Content

Yulia Citra
Etmi Hardi

Abstract

Digital historiography has received attention in various studies alongside the development of information technology and social media. However, studies that specifically discuss changes in historical authority, narrative legitimacy, the reproduction of collective memory, and the spread of historical disinformation on social media remain relatively limited. This study aims to analyze how social media shapes historical narratives and to identify various critical issues that emerge in historiographical practice in the digital era. This study uses a qualitative approach with a qualitative content analysis design combined with digital ethnography. The research data were obtained from 150 historical contents and 3,500 user comments on TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, Facebook, and X platforms selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through digital documentation and non-participant observation, and were then analyzed using thematic analysis comprising coding, categorization, theme development, and data interpretation. The results show five main findings, namely the increasing democratization of historical narrative production, the dominance of popularity over academic authority as a source of legitimacy, the simplification and fragmentation of historical events, the reproduction of collective memory through digital interaction, and the emergence of disinformation and contestation of historical narratives in social media spaces. These findings also show that social media has transformed historiographical practice from a model centered on academic institutions toward a more participatory and open model. The conclusion of this study affirms the importance of historical literacy and digital literacy in addressing the dynamics of historical knowledge production in the social media era. The implications of the study include strengthening digital historiography theory, developing studies on public history and collective memory, and formulating historical education strategies that are more adaptive to technological transformation. This study also opens opportunities for further research on the influence of algorithms and artificial intelligence on the formation of digital historical narratives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Scopus Citation Data

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Roesli M. (2026)
    Digital Land Certification in Indonesia: A Trilemma of Law, Tech, and Society
    International Journal of Law and Society, 5(1), 187-209
  2. Pakala Y. (2026)
    Advancing Digital Extension Education: Development and Validation of Digital Learning Engagement Scale
    Indian Journal of Extension Education, 62(1), 159-165
  3. Alkan A. (2026)
    Analysis of Factors Affecting Academic Success with Machine Learning: Data-Driven Inferences in Education
    Turkish Journal of Engineering, 10(1), 48-62

Article Details

How to Cite
Citra, Y., & Hardi, E. (2026). Isu-Isu Kritis Historiografi di Era Digital: Analisis Narasi Sejarah pada Media Sosial. YASIN, 6(4), 3905-3926. https://doi.org/10.58578/yasin.v6i4.10692

References

Alit, A., & Mursidi, A. (2025). Social media and historical consciousness in contemporary Indonesian society.

Arias, P. (2024). Digital narratives and the transformation of historical representation in online environments.

Boler, M., Macdonald, A., Nitsou, C., & Harris, A. (2024). Digital misinformation, algorithmic culture, and historical narratives in social media.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.

Charmaz, K. (2024). Constructing grounded theory (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Hidayat, A. P., Suhaedi, H. S., & Sujana, A. M. (2024). History as “leisure pursuit”: The appearance of history on social media and the eroded of professional historians in the digital era. Proceeding of ADIA, 536–547. https://journal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/ADIA/article/view/4829

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Matitaputty, J. K., Saputra, N., Judijanto, L., Susanto, N., Hanif, M., Sopacua, J., & Fadli, M. R. (2024). PjBL-based digital history model to improve historical concept skills and historical consciousness. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 18(2), 430–440. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i2.21152

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Paulus, T. M., Lester, J. N., & Dempster, P. G. (2014). Digital tools for qualitative research. SAGE Publications.

Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2016). Digital ethnography: Principles and practice. SAGE Publications.

Priem, K. (2024). Pasts revisited: The rise of public history through epistemological and technological transformations. History of Education & Children’s Literature, 19(1), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.48219/1278

Ramadhan, F., Setiawan, B., & Maulana, F. (2024). The representation of history in digital media and its influence on collective memory. Journal Social Humanity Perspective, 2(3), 165–177. https://doi.org/10.71435/661332

Santos, J. P. (2024). Social media and digital historical consciousness in history education.

Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. SAGE Publications.

Tikka, M., Suominen, J., & Östman, S. (2023). The historian’s handbook to digital history. Routledge.

Wijaya, A., Nugroho, D., & Putri, R. (2026). Artificial intelligence, digital manipulation, and challenges for historical verification.

Zaagsma, G. (2024). Facing the history machine: Toward histories of digital history. History of Humanities, 9(2), 451–491. https://doi.org/10.1086/731827


Explore Our Journals
Find the most suitable journal for your research. If this journal does not fully align with the scope of your manuscript, we invite you to explore our wider portfolio of journals covering diverse fields of study. Please select one of the journals below to identify the most appropriate publication platform for your work.