Identifikasi dan Analisis Isu-Isu Kritis dalam Historiografi Indonesia Kontemporer: Studi Empiris terhadap Perspektif Akademisi Sejarah Identification and Analysis of Critical Issues in Contemporary Indonesian Historiography: An Empirical Study of History Academics' Perspectives

Main Article Content

Rahmania Arunita Hendarto
Etmi Hardi

Abstract

Although contemporary Indonesian historiography has received attention in various studies, empirical research that specifically identifies and analyzes critical issues based on the perspectives of history academics remains relatively limited. This study aims to identify and analyze various strategic issues that influence the development of contemporary Indonesian historiography through the views of history academics. This study uses a qualitative approach with a multiple case study design, involving 20 history academics selected through purposive sampling and developed through snowball sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and document analysis, and were then analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. The results show that six main issues dominate contemporary Indonesian historiography, namely objectivity and bias in historical interpretation, the dominance of state narratives, the low representation of marginal groups, the need for historiographical decolonization, the impact of digitalization on historical research practices, and the urgency of renewing historiographical methodology. The findings also show that academics view historiography as a construction of knowledge influenced by power relations, social context, and technological development, thereby requiring a more inclusive, critical, and interdisciplinary approach. The conclusion of this study affirms that the development of contemporary Indonesian historiography needs to be directed toward renewing paradigms, methods, and historical sources that are more critical and responsive to social and digital change. This study contributes theoretically to strengthening critical historiography and postmodern historiography perspectives in the Indonesian context, and contributes methodologically through the application of a multiple case study design and reflexive thematic analysis in historiographical studies. The practical implications of this study include the development of history curricula, archival management policies, and innovations in historical research methodology, while also opening opportunities for further studies on the use of digital humanities and artificial intelligence in the development of Indonesian historiography.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Scopus Citation Data

Citation data unavailable
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Sukatiman (2026)
    Improving Critical Thinking Skills through a Flipped Project-Based Learning Model Integrated with Mockup Media and Augmented Reality
    Electronic Journal of E Learning, 24(1), 61-74
  2. Guttormsen T.S. (2026)
    Assemblage urbanism: the role of heritage in urban placemaking
    Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 16(7), 36-53
  3. Berdica B. (2026)
    Professional Competence of Secondary School Teachers and the Development of Students Practical Skills for PISA Readiness
    International Journal of Innovative Technology and Interdisciplinary Sciences, 9(1), 433-462

Article Details

How to Cite
Hendarto, R. A., & Hardi, E. (2026). Identifikasi dan Analisis Isu-Isu Kritis dalam Historiografi Indonesia Kontemporer: Studi Empiris terhadap Perspektif Akademisi Sejarah. ARZUSIN, 6(4), 4146-4165. https://doi.org/10.58578/arzusin.v6i4.10693

References

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.

Cohen, D. J., & Rosenzweig, R. (2006). Digital history: A guide to gathering, preserving, and presenting the past on the web. University of Pennsylvania Press. https://chnm.gmu.edu/digitalhistory/

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S., Giardina, M. D., & Cannella, G. S. (Eds.). (2023). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Graham, S., Milligan, I., Weingart, S., & Martin, K. (2022). Exploring big historical data: The historian’s macroscope (2nd ed.). World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/12435

Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2023). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln, M. D. Giardina, & G. S. Cannella (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

McGregor, K. E. (2007). History in uniform: Military ideology and the construction of Indonesia’s past. NUS Press.

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Milligan, I. (2022). The transformation of historical research in the digital age. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009026055

Munslow, A. (2021). History: A very short introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Nordholt, H. S., Purwanto, B., & Saptari, R. (Eds.). (2008). Perspektif Baru Penulisan Sejarah Indonesia. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Orb, A., Eisenhauer, L., & Wynaden, D. (2001). Ethics in qualitative research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(1), 93–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00093.x

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Presnell, J. L. (2024). The information-literate historian: A guide to research for history students (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Rosenzweig, R. (2011). Clio wired: The future of the past in the digital age. Columbia University Press.

Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. SAGE Publications.

Tosh, J. (2021). The pursuit of history: Aims, methods and new directions in the study of history (7th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003023340

Tracy, S. J. (2020). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.


Explore Our Journals
Find the most suitable journal for your research. If this journal does not fully align with the scope of your manuscript, we invite you to explore our wider portfolio of journals covering diverse fields of study. Please select one of the journals below to identify the most appropriate publication platform for your work.