Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

The theory of student development has become an important study in the world of education. Three main theories, namely nativism, empiricism, and convergence, offer different perspectives in understanding the factors that influence student learning and growth. Nativism emphasizes that individual development is more influenced by innate factors, while empiricism assumes that experience and environment are the main factors in learning. Convergence theory tries to combine these two views, by emphasizing the interaction between genetic and environmental factors in the educational process. This research aims to analyze the extent to which these three theories are still relevant in the context of modern education. Although convergence is becoming a more widely accepted approach, there is still a research gap regarding how innate and environmental factors interact specifically in the learning process, especially with current technological developments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Irawati R. (2027)
    Enhancing accounting students’ writing performance through problem-based learning: Evidence from a vocational higher education context
    Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 9(1)
  2. Ding S. (2027)
    Digital Renewal of University Education: Barriers, Opportunities, and Contributions to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(2), 229-240
  3. Unyaphatariyakool S. (2027)
    Science Teachers’ Learning Management Competency through Professional Learning Communities to Promote Scientific Creativity and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(2), 241-252

Article Details

How to Cite
Anshory, M. I., Murtadho, I., & Nuryahya, I. (2025). Peserta Didik dalam Pandangan Nativisme, Empirisme, dan Konvergensi. TSAQOFAH, 5(2), 1487-1492. https://doi.org/10.58578/tsaqofah.v5i2.4847

References

Intan Putri, DI (2020). Manajemen Pengembangan Peserta Didik Berbasis Total Quality Management di MI Al-Hidayah Bagor Miri Sragen. Millah: Jurnal Kajian Keagamaan , 20 (1), 63–88. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol20.iss1.art3
Locke, J. (1690). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. London: Thomas Bassett.
Mesra, P., Kuntarto, E., & han, FC (2021). Faktor – Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Minat Belajar Siswa di Masa Pandem. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan , 7 (3), 177-183. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5037881
Nadirah, S. (2013). ANAK DIDIK PERSPEKTIF NATIVISME, EMPIRISME, DAN KONVERGENSI. Lentera Pendidikan : Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan , 16 (2), 188-195. https://doi.org/10.24252/lp.2013v16n2a6
Plomin, R., & von Stumm, S. (2018). The new genetics of intelligence. Nature Reviews Genetics, 19(3), 148-159.
Rahmat, P. S. (2016). Peran pendidikan dalam membentuk generasi berkarakter pancasila. Pedagogi: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 3(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.25134/pedagogi.v3i2.1161
Sari, L. M. (2018). Evaluasi dalam pendidikan Islam. Al-Tadzkiyyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9(2), 211-231. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/atjpi.v9i2.3624
Schopenhauer, A. (1819). The World as Will and Representation. Leipzig: Brockhaus.
Stern, W. (1914). The Psychological Methods of Testing Intelligence. Baltimore: Warwick & York.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 > >>