Islamic Worldview sebagai Kritik terhadap Sekularisasi Ilmu Pengetahuan Modern Islamic Worldview as a Critique of the Secularization of Modern Science

Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

The secularization of modern science has produced a dichotomy between science and religion, resulting in the reduction of metaphysical, ethical, and spiritual dimensions in the development of knowledge. This condition demonstrates the need for an epistemological paradigm capable of integrating revelation, reason, and empirical experience proportionally. This study aims to analyze the concept of the Islamic worldview as a critique of the secularization of modern science and to explain its relevance in developing an integrative scientific paradigm. This study employed a qualitative approach using the library research method. Data were obtained from the Qur’an, hadith, the works of contemporary Muslim thinkers, reputable scholarly articles, and academic literature related to the philosophy of science, Islamic epistemology, and secularization. The data were analyzed using content analysis techniques and critical analysis of various emerging scientific perspectives. The findings show that the Islamic worldview offers a scientific paradigm based on the principles of tawhid, the integration of revelation and reason, the unity of reality, and moral responsibility in scientific activities. This paradigm critiques secular assumptions that separate religion from science and affirms that knowledge functions not only as a rational-empirical instrument but also as a means to realize human welfare and devotion to Allah. The conclusion of this study indicates that the Islamic worldview makes a significant contribution to reconstructing the epistemology of modern science toward a system of knowledge that is holistic, ethical, and transcendental. The implications of this study provide a conceptual foundation for the development of higher education, scientific research, and academic policy based on the integration of knowledge with Islamic values.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Hasan A. (2026)
    Integrating Maqasid al-Shariah into Islamic Sustainable Banking: A Systematic Review of Halal Industry Practices and Green Economy Alignment (2020–2024)
    Banco, 8(1), 230-245
  2. Roisa N. (2027)
    Teacher readiness for Merdeka curriculum implementation in Islamic elementary schools in Indonesia
    Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 9(1)
  3. Angraini L.M. (2027)
    Integrating Computational Thinking and Islamic Values in Geometry Learning: Effects on Pre-Service Primary Teachers’ Conceptual Understanding
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(1), 67-78

Article Details

How to Cite
Nurifai, A. S., & Sumiran, S. (2026). Islamic Worldview sebagai Kritik terhadap Sekularisasi Ilmu Pengetahuan Modern. TSAQOFAH, 6(4), 4084-4098. https://doi.org/10.58578/tsaqofah.v6i4.10943

References

Açıkgenç, A. (1996). Islamic science: Towards a definition. International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC).

Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1995). Prolegomena to the metaphysics of Islam: An exposition of the fundamental elements of the worldview of Islam. International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC).

Al-Faruqi, I. R. (1982). Islamization of knowledge: General principles and workplan. International Institute of Islamic Thought.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Hashim, R., & Rossidy, I. (2000). Islamization of knowledge: A comparative analysis of the conceptions of Al-Attas and Al-Faruqi. Intellectual Discourse, 8(1), 19–44. https://journals.iium.edu.my/intdiscourse/index.php/id/article/view/479

Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Machi, L. A., & McEvoy, B. T. (2022). The literature review: Six steps to success (4th ed.). Corwin.

Nasr, S. H. (1993). The need for a sacred science. State University of New York Press.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Wan Daud, W. M. N. (1998). The educational philosophy and practice of Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas: An exposition of the original concept of Islamization. International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC).

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>