Analisis Pengawasan Kekuasaan Pemerintah dalam Perspektif Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia Analysis of Oversight of Government Power from the Perspective of Indonesian Constitutional Law

Main Article Content

Muhammat Davi
M. Aditya Yusuf

Abstract

The urgency of oversight over government power has become increasingly critical in the administration of the modern state, which is vulnerable to the abuse of authority and uncontrolled executive discretion. Although previous studies have examined government oversight from the perspectives of administrative law and institutions, these studies tend to be partial and have not integrated legislative oversight, judicial review, and internal oversight mechanisms into a holistic constitutional law framework. This study aimed to analyze the mechanisms for overseeing government power in the Indonesian constitutional law system, evaluate their effectiveness in preventing the abuse of power, identify juridical obstacles, and formulate recommendations for improvement. This study used a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Data were collected through a literature review of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials from the 2016–2024 period and then analyzed through the stages of inventory, systematization, norm interpretation, and legal construction. The study was conducted from January to August 2024. The results showed that the Indonesian constitutional law system has provided a comprehensive normative framework for oversight through legislative oversight by the DPR, judicial oversight by the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court, as well as external and internal oversight through the BPK, the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia, and APIP. However, the effectiveness of oversight still faces significant weaknesses, as indicated by 29% of BPK audit recommendations not being followed up, Indonesia’s Corruption Perceptions Index score of 34/100 with a ranking of 115/180, and the continued compromise of the institutional independence of supervisory bodies. The conclusion of this study emphasizes that although a comprehensive normative framework for oversight is already available, its effectiveness remains hindered by regulatory disharmony, limited institutional independence, and procedural complexity. This study contributes by offering a reconstruction of an oversight framework based on integrative constitutionalism through regulatory harmonization in an umbrella law, strengthening the executorial authority of the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia, and modernizing the oversight system through technology-based e-monitoring.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Scopus Citation Data

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Ricaldi Echevarria M.L. (2026)
    Educational inequalities in academic performance in secondary education in Peru: a multilevel analysis
    Praxis Educativa, 21
  2. Toscano Aznar L. (2026)
    Neurosyphilis: descriptive analysis of clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes
    Enfermedades Infecciosas Y Microbiologia Clinica, 44(8)
  3. Moura A.P.S. (2026)
    Information mediation and black feminism: an analysis of dissertations and theses from Brazilian Postgraduate Programs in Information Science
    Palabra Clave La Plata, 15(1)

Article Details

How to Cite
Davi, M., & Yusuf, M. A. (2026). Analisis Pengawasan Kekuasaan Pemerintah dalam Perspektif Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia. YASIN, 6(3), 2415-2427. https://doi.org/10.58578/yasin.v6i3.9979

References

Aprilla, W., Wulandari, M., & Elcaputera, A. (2024). Meningkatkan Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas Pemerintah melalui Teknologi Digital dan Partisipasi Publik dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Korupsi. Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara, 2(4), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v2i4.1553

Asshiddiqie, J. (2021). Reformasi Kelembagaan Negara dan Penguatan Prinsip Checks and Balances Pasca-Amandemen UUD 1945. Jurnal Hukum dan Konstitusi, 3(1), 1–30.

Faisal, A. (2022). Efektivitas Kelembagaan Pengawas dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 52(3), 450–478.

Huda, N. (2023). Politik Hukum Pengawasan Legislatif terhadap Eksekutif di Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 20(2), 315–345.

Iskandar, G., & Pranoto, E. (2026). Independensi Pengawas Internal dan Eksternal Birokrasi Publik serta Implikasinya terhadap Good Governance. Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum, 19(1), 399–412. https://journal.uniba.ac.id/index.php/SH/article/view/1463

Jabar, S., Frinaldi, A., & Roberia. (2024). Akuntabilitas dan Transparansi dalam Perspektif Hukum Administrasi Negara. Gudang Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu, 2(12), 720–728. https://gudangjurnal.com/index.php/gjmi/article/view/1196

Kurniawati, D., & Rohmah, E. I. (2024). Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Penguatan Prinsip Checks and Balances dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Qaumiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara, 5(2), 183–207. https://doi.org/10.24239/qaumiyyah.v5i2.158

Lailam, T. (2022). Rekonstruksi Model Pengujian Konstitusionalitas Undang-Undang di Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 19(3), 567–595.

Mahfud MD, M. (2022). Fragmentasi Politik dan Implikasinya terhadap Fungsi Pengawasan Legislatif di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 29(2), 210–238.

Martitah, M., & Farida, A. (2023). Penguatan Fungsi Pengawasan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Sistem Checks and Balances di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 30(1), 1–25.

Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Karakteristik Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Implikasinya terhadap Metodologi Penelitian Hukum di Indonesia. Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum, 36(1), 1–18.

Mustafa, H., & Rahardjo, S. (2022). Disharmoni Regulasi Pengawasan Keuangan Negara: Studi atas Relasi BPK dan BPKP. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 22(4), 499–518.

Najib, M. K., & Mahendradi, R. M. (2025). Pengawasan Internal Hukum terhadap Penyusunan Anggaran Daerah di Indonesia. Jurnal ISO: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora, 6(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.53697/iso.v6i1.3316

Prasetyo, A. B. (2023). Penguatan Independensi Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah Daerah dalam Perspektif Hukum Tata Negara. Jurnal Hukum Administrasi Negara, 10(2), 88–107.

Prasetyo, T., & Barkatullah, A. H. (2022). Komparasi Kewenangan Eksekutorial Ombudsman: Studi Perbandingan Indonesia dan Swedia. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 11(2), 200–222.

Ridwan, H. R. (2023). Kompetensi Auditor dan Efektivitas Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah Daerah di Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Negara, 8(1), 45–64.

Rusdianto, U. (2021). Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Kewenangan Ombudsman Republik Indonesia dalam Penanganan Laporan Maladministrasi. Jurnal Rechts Vinding, 10(3), 445–462.

Said, A. R., & Ahmad, S. (2024). Hak Angket dalam Penguatan Fungsi Pengawasan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia. Binamulia Hukum, 13(2), 361–376. https://ejournal.hukumunkris.id/index.php/binamulia/article/view/950

Siahaan, M. (2020). Peran Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan dalam Pengawasan Keuangan Negara: Kajian atas Tindak Lanjut Hasil Pemeriksaan. Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 8(1), 33–50.

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2020). Urgensi Penelitian Hukum Normatif dalam Pengembangan Ilmu Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 50(4), 789–808.

Yanti, D. R., Agustina, A., Defna, S., Nurcahyati, & Sari, N. (2026). Pengawasan Ombudsman terhadap Maladministrasi Pelayanan Publik. Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice, 3(3), 19. https://doi.org/10.47134/ijlj.v3i3.5398


Explore Our Journals
Find the most suitable journal for your research. If this journal does not fully align with the scope of your manuscript, we invite you to explore our wider portfolio of journals covering diverse fields of study. Please select one of the journals below to identify the most appropriate publication platform for your work.