Penguatan Perencanaan Pembangunan Berbasis Crosscutting untuk Mendukung Pencapaian Prioritas RPJMD Kota Padang Tahun 2025-2029 Strengthening Crosscutting-Based Development Planning to Support the Achievement of Padang City RPJMD Priorities for 2025-2029
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
7129-7150
Digital Object Identifier:
Viewed: 123 times
Downloaded: 47 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:Jacky Marklin1
Copyright :Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Cross-sectoral development challenges require interconnected contributions among local government agencies, whereas planning mechanisms still tend to follow organizational structures and sectoral programs. This study aimed to analyze the strengthening of crosscutting-based development planning and formulate a model that supports the achievement of the priorities of the Padang City Regional Medium-Term Development Plan (RPJMD) for 2025–2029. The study employed an applied policy analysis approach with a document-based descriptive-evaluative design. Data were obtained through a review of planning and regulatory documents and subsequently analyzed using gap analysis, cause-and-effect analysis, the Urgency, Seriousness, and Growth (USG) method, and weighted policy alternative assessment. The results showed that the primary problem was the absence of a horizontal architecture connecting objectives, indicators, local government agency contributions, budgets, data, risks, and outcome reviews. The Integrated Inter-Agency Planning System alternative received the highest score of 4.30 compared with the other two alternatives. These findings produced the PADANG Terpadu Model, which integrates Shared Priorities, Contribution Architecture, Integrated Data, Integrated Budgeting, Performance Navigation, and Collaborative Governance. This model strengthens crosscutting planning as a governance framework for shared outcomes without establishing a separate new planning system. This study provides an operational policy framework for the Padang City Government to align the contributions of local government agencies, resources, and performance measurement more comprehensively with RPJMD priorities.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles
-
Hayes K.N. (2026)Nature journaling: a space for student sensemaking regarding the crosscutting conceptsDisciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 8(1)
-
Liu Z. (2026)Advances in biomimetic carbon dioxide capture and catalytic conversionJournal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 14(6)
-
Nam S.L. (2026)Setting research priorities for sexual and reproductive health in humanitarian settings: a global, stakeholder-informed agendaConflict and Health, 20(1)
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Afandi, M. N., Anomsari, E. T., Novira, A., & Sudartini, S. (2023). Collaborative governance in a mandated setting: Shifting collaboration in stunting interventions at local level. Development Studies Research, 10(1), Article 2212868. https://doi.org/10.1080/21665095.2023.2212868
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
Aoki, N., Tay, M., & Rawat, S. (2024). Whole-of-government and joined-up government: A systematic literature review. Public Administration, 102(2), 733–752. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12949
Bardach, E., & Patashnik, E. M. (2020). A practical guide for policy analysis: The eightfold path to more effective problem solving (6th ed.). CQ Press. https://search.worldcat.org/title/A-practical-guide-for-policy-analysis-%3A-the-eightfold-path-to-more-effective-problem-solving/oclc/1082292641
Bauer, Z., AbouAssi, K., & Johnston, J. M. (2023). Governance arrangements of cross-sector collaboration and its effectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 52(2), 346–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640221100705
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross-sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12432
Dunn, W. N. (2018). Public policy analysis: An integrated approach (6th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315181226
Fatikha, N. T., & Permatasari, A. (2023). Collaborative Governance dalam Penanganan Stunting. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik, 14(3), 277–287. https://doi.org/10.31258/jkp.v14i3.8308
Guspika. (2025). Makalah Kebijakan (Policy Paper/Policy Brief): Salah Satu Bentuk Tulisan Karya Ilmiah [Bahan briefing]. Pusbindiklatren Kementerian PPN/Bappenas.
Molenveld, A., Verhoest, K., & Wynen, J. (2021). Why public organizations contribute to crosscutting policy programs: The role of structure, culture, and ministerial control. Policy Sciences, 54(1), 123–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-020-09379-y
OECD. (2020). Policy framework on sound public governance: Baseline features of governments that work well. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c03e01b3-en
OECD. (2023). Driving policy coherence for sustainable development: Accelerating progress on the SDGs. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a6cb4aa1-en
Peraturan Daerah Kota Padang Nomor 9 Tahun 2025 tentang Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah Tahun 2025–2029. (2025). https://jdih.padang.go.id/peraturan/rencana-pembangunan-jangka-menengah-daerah-tahun-2025-2029
Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia Nomor 86 Tahun 2017 tentang Tata Cara Perencanaan, Pengendalian, dan Evaluasi Pembangunan Daerah, Tata Cara Evaluasi Rancangan Peraturan Daerah tentang Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Panjang Daerah dan Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah, serta Tata Cara Perubahan Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Panjang Daerah, Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah, dan Rencana Kerja Pemerintah Daerah. (2017). https://peraturan.go.id/id/permendagri-no-86-tahun-2017
Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia Nomor 90 Tahun 2019 tentang Klasifikasi, Kodefikasi, dan Nomenklatur Perencanaan Pembangunan dan Keuangan Daerah. (2019). https://peraturan.go.id/id/permendagri-no-90-tahun-2019
Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2025 tentang Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional Tahun 2025–2029. (2025). https://www.peraturan.go.id/id/perpres-no-12-tahun-2025
Peraturan Wali Kota Padang Nomor 15 Tahun 2025 tentang Rencana Strategis Perangkat Daerah Tahun 2025–2029. (2025). https://jdih.padang.go.id/peraturan/rencana-strategis-perangkat-daerah-tahun-2025-2029
Susha, I., van den Broek, T., van Veenstra, A.-F., & Linåker, J. (2023). An ecosystem perspective on developing data collaboratives for addressing societal issues: The role of conveners. Government Information Quarterly, 40(1), Article 101763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101763
Trein, P., Biesbroek, R., Bolognesi, T., Cejudo, G. M., Duffy, R., Hustedt, T., & Meyer, I. (2021). Policy coordination and integration: A research agenda. Public Administration Review, 81(5), 973–977. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13180
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 25 Tahun 2004 tentang Sistem Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional. (2004). https://www.peraturan.go.id/id/uu-no-25-tahun-2004