Penerapan Alat Evaluasi Matching Card PBL-CIRC Mengukur Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas V Materi Pidato Application of the PBL–CIRC Matching Card Assessment Tool to Measure Fifth-Grade Students’ Critical Thinking in Speech Lessons
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
6555-6565
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/yasin.v5i6.8195
Viewed: 146 times
Downloaded: 85 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Meuthia Azzahra1*, Panca Dewi Purwati2 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study originates from the problem of limited authentic assessment instruments that specifically measure elementary students’ critical thinking skills, particularly in speech text learning. It aims to develop, implement, and validate a matching card evaluation tool based on Problem-Based Learning (PBL) and Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) to assess fifth-grade students’ critical thinking abilities. A mixed-methods approach with a concurrent embedded design was employed, involving 28 students. Quantitative data were obtained from matching card results, while qualitative data were collected through classroom observations, questionnaires, and interviews. The findings show that the integration of PBL and CIRC increases students’ engagement in analyzing text structure, identifying main ideas, and evaluating the interrelationships among text elements. The matching card instrument proved effective in measuring critical thinking indicators, as evidenced by an average score of 78.2 and a classical mastery level of 82.1%. Qualitatively, 85.7% of students stated that the instrument helped improve their understanding, accuracy, and confidence during assessment. These results lead to the conclusion that matching cards provide valid evidence of students’ analytical, interpretive, and relational thinking processes, and contribute to strengthening literacy-based pedagogy through authentic assessment aligned with higher-order thinking skills. The implications of this study include opportunities for broader implementation, the need for long-term evaluation of critical thinking development, and the potential integration of the instrument into digital platforms, alongside recommendations to refine the level of card complexity and test the instrument in more diverse student populations.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Ahmed, A., & Pereira, L. (2024). Mixed Methods Research: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Researchgate. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.22861.82403 [Broken Link]
Aritonang, P. S. F., Amelia, R., Afianto, R., Amalia, S., & Fitrianna, A. Y. (2024). Penerapan Problem Based Learning (PBL) dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Profesi Pendidikan, 3(2), 93–104. https://journal.ikipsiliwangi.ac.id/jpp/article/view/25716 [Broken Link]
Ariyana, I. K. S., & Suastika, I. N. (2022). Model Pembelajaran CIRC (Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition) Sebagai Salah Satu Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, 22(1), 203–211. https://doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v22i1.2016
Aziz, A. A., Nurfarida, R., Budiyanti, N., & Zakiah, Q. Y. (2020). Model Analisis Kebijakan Pendidikan. Tapis: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah, 4(2), 192–201. https://doi.org/10.32332/tapis.v4i2.2575
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th Ed.). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd Ed.). SAGE Publications.
Gierus, B. (2025). Prevalence and Quality of Mixed Methods Research in Education. Routledge.
Habibullah, J. A., Norvaizi, I., & Dewi, D. E. C. (2025). Implementasi Mixed Methods dalam Penelitian Pendidikan: Konsep dan Aplikasinya. Peradaban Journal of Interdisciplinary Educational Research, 3(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.59001/pjier.v3i1.245
Khabibullah, M., & Sholahuddin, G. M. I. (2024). Tahapan dan Langkah-Langkah Penerapan Mixed Method Research (MMR) dalam Penelitian Pendidikan. Qomaruna Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 2(1), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.62048/qjms.v2i1.55
Nasir, & Sukmawati. (2023). Analysis of Research Data Quantitative and Qualitative (Vol. 7). Science Gate.
Naufal, M., Sa’adah, M., Rahmawati, I., Suriansyah, A., & Cinantya, C. (2024). Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dan Hasil Belajar Menggunakan Model Problem Based Learning pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Maras: Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin, 2(4), 1983–1990. https://doi.org/10.60126/maras.v2i4.548
Ningsih, D. A. S., Hambali, H., & Imran, M. E. (2023). Penerapan Model Problem Based Learning untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SD. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Citra Bakti, 10(4), 695–706. https://doi.org/10.38048/jipcb.v10i4.1745
Plano Clark, V. L. (2022). Mixed Methods Research: Expanding the Evidence Base. Cambridge University Press.
Putri, G. S. D. S., Rahmah, I. A., Janah, V. R., Suriansyah, A., & Cinantya, C. (2024). Penerapan Model Problem Based Learning untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Maras: Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin, 2(4), 1954–1963. https://doi.org/10.60126/maras.v2i4.544
Putri, P. N., Mulyani, S., & Caturiasari, J. (2023). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran CIRC terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa dalam Pembelajaran IPS. Khazanah Pendidikan, 17(2), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.30595/jkp.v17i2.18280
Siregar, A. I., & Rozi, F. (2024). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Handayani, 15(1), 138–144. https://doi.org/10.24114/jh.v15i1.58575
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of Mixed Methods Research (2nd Ed.). SAGE Publications.
Wahyuni, I., Efendi, U., Siregar, R. A., Diana, S. M., & Destini, F. (2025). The Effectiveness of the Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) Learning Model on Indonesian Reading Comprehension Skills of Fourth Grade Elementary Students. Terampil: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Dasar, 12(1), 100–115. https://doi.org/10.24042/terampil.v12i1.28276
Yanty, E., Nasution, P., Qatrunnada, A., & Rahmi, R. (2024). The Effect of CIRC Learning Model on Mathematical Critical Thinking Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 55–63.
Zainal, N. F. (2022). Problem Based Learning pada Pembelajaran Matematika di Sekolah Dasar/Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(3), 3584–3593. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i3.2650