Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

The research aims to determine: 1. The relationship between learning interest and geography learning outcomes at SMA Negeri 2 Pariaman, 2. The relationship between spatial thinking ability and geography learning outcomes at SMA Negeri 2 Pariaman, and 3. The relationship between learning interest and spatial thinking ability with geography learning outcomes at SMA Negeri 2 Kota Pariaman. The research uses a quantitative correlational approach. The population and sample of the study consist of 141 students of class X.E, selected using a saturated sampling technique. The data collection methods include questionnaires, tests, and documentation. The data analysis techniques include instrument testing, descriptive statistical analysis, and hypothesis testing. The conclusions of the study are as follows: 1) There is a relationship between learning interest and learning outcomes, with a score of 10.2 and a correlation coefficient of 0.319, indicating a weak relationship. Good interest stimulates students' enthusiasm for learning. For example, geography material can stimulate students' interest in learning geography in class if it is presented in a relevant, engaging, and interactive manner. 2) There is a relationship between spatial thinking skills and learning outcomes, with a score of 10.7 and a correlation coefficient of 0.327, indicating a weak relationship. The discussion of the geosphere material as part of the spatial reasoning test includes understanding and analyzing various components and spatial relationships of the geosphere. 3) There is a correlation between learning interest and spatial thinking ability, with a learning score of 19.4 and a correlation coefficient of 0.440, indicating a moderate relationship. The research results show that factors such as learning interest and spatial thinking ability can contribute positively to learning outcomes. As learning interest and spatial thinking improve, learning outcomes tend to increase as well.

Keywords:
Download Full-Text PDF Direct PDF file • 3656.pdf

Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Ratnaningsih E. (2027)
    Designing a Data-Driven E-Learning Module for Teaching English to Young Learners: Integrating Needs Analysis and the ISAV Learning Model
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(2), 269-286
  2. Azhand A. (2027)
    Teaching Persian derivational affixes to non-Persian speakers from a Cognitive Morphology Approach: A case study of nominal suffixes (kar, gar, ban, baz, -ande)
    Language Related Research, 17(4), 469-497
  3. Unyaphatariyakool S. (2027)
    Science Teachers’ Learning Management Competency through Professional Learning Communities to Promote Scientific Creativity and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(2), 241-252

Article Details

How to Cite
Fadila, F., & Nova, S. (2024). Hubungan antara Minat Belajar dan Kemampuan Berpikir Spasial Peserta Didik dengan Hasil Belajar Geografi di SMA Negeri 2 Pariaman. YASIN, 4(5), 977-983. https://doi.org/10.58578/yasin.v4i5.3656

References

Abelda, D., & Anwar, S. (2023). Hubungan Antara Motivasi Belajar Dengan Kemampuan Berpikir Spasial Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Geografi di SMAN 1 Kota Pariaman. Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 3(3), 10078-10089.
Ahyuni. (2016). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Berpikir Spasial bagi Calon Guru Geografi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Geografi: Kecerdasan Spasial Dalam Pembelajaran Dan Perencanaan Pembangunan, 163–175.
Aliman, M., Mutia, T., & Arisius, Y. (2018). Integritas Kebangsaan Dalam Tes Berpikir Spasial. October.
Anwar, S. (2016). Pengembangan Instrumen Kecerdasan Spasial Sebagai Alat Ukur Kemampuan Awal Siswa : Aplikasi Instrumen Penilaian Dalam Pembalajaran Geografi. Paper Knowledge. Toward a Media History of Documents, 12–26.
Edy, Syahputra. (2020). Snowball Throwing Tingkatan Minat dan Hasil Belajar. Sukabumi: Haura Publishing.
Febriani, A., Chaniago, S., & Setiawati, M. (2022). Peningkatan Minat Siswa Dalam Mapel Geografi Dan Peran Guru Terhadap Motivasi Belajar Siswa Kelas XI SMAN 1 X Koto Singkarak. Jurnal Eduscience, 9(2), 505-514.
Jayanti, M. M. A., & Jamil, M. A. M. M. (2023). Pengaruh Kecerdasan Visual Spasial Terhadap Hasil Belajar Geografi Siswa MAN 1 Kota Malang. Jurnal Swarnabhumi: Jurnal Geografi dan Pembelajaran Geografi, 8(2), 109-118.
Maharani, Winda & Enok Maryani. (2015). Peningkatan Spatial Literacy Peserta Didik Menggunakan Pemanfaatan Media Peta. Jurnal Pendidikan Geografi, 46, 4184 – 8037.
Marlian, A. M. (2018). Hubungan Kemampuan Berpikir Spasial Geografis dengan Hasil Belajar Geografi Siswa SMAN 1 Sewon. Geo Educasia, 3(5), 1658-1669.
Saputro, R. (2020). Kemampuan Berpikir Spasial Peserta Didik Menggunakan Peta Dan Citra Inderaja Pada Pembelajaran Geografi Di SMAN 1 Bae Kudus. In Thesis.
Wijayanto, B., Sutriani, W., & Luthfi, F. (2020). Kemampuan Berfikir Spasial Dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21. Jurnal Samudra Geografi, 3(2), 42-5