Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

The configuration of the development of modern philanthropy has a long and tumultuous history, emerging as a symbol of the thesis and antithesis, resistance and struggle, rebellion and counter-aggression and rejection of what is past and traditional. In modern times a philosophy emerged from various schools emerged. Basically the overall pattern of modern philosophy takes on the color of Greek philosophical Sufism. The development of human thought in the Middle Ages gave rise to thoughts oriented to the advancement of technology (modern philosophy), this was marked by the emergence of the Renaissance. In this century, science experienced rapid progress which led to the industrial revolution in England with the results of fame by modern philosophers. The Renaissance is a time of rebirth of classical Greek and Roman civilization. The concept of history at this time refers to periods of indivualism, the rise of antique culture, discoveries of the world and humans, as a period opposed to the medieval period. This era is also a refinement of art, expertise, and knowledge that is manifested in a versatile genius. Figures from this school are Nicholas Copernicus, Francis Bacon, Tycho Brahe. Johannes Keppler, Gallileo Galilei, Isaac Newton, and Joseph Black. Rationalism is the flow that has the view that knowledge is obtained by rational processes, namely through reasoning, knowledge can be achieved naturally can be used by humans, namely reason (ratio) and experience (empiri) also legitimately and correctly. The philosophers of this genre are Rene Decartes, Barunch Spinoza, and Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz. In addition to the two schools above, there is a school of empiricism which has an opinion contrary to Rationalism. They were of the view that knowledge was obtained from empirical experience, the leaders of this sect were Thomas Hobbes and John Locke.

Keywords:
Download Full-Text PDF Direct PDF file • 480.pdf

Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
1
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Tran the J. (2026)
    Psychoanalysis, effectiveness, and etiology: Some epistemological clarifications surrounding the debate on Amendment 159
    Information Psychiatrique, 102(7), 542-550
  2. Sylla N.S. (2026)
    Breaking free from the CFA franc: Reflecting on the history and protagonists of the debate. Interview with Ndongo Samba Sylla
    Politique Africaine, 180(4), 123-153
  3. Turienzo D. (2026)
    Educational feminization and media underrepresentation: the gender gap in the educational debate
    Bordon Revista De Pedagogia, 78(2), 11-27

Article Details

How to Cite
Nurhadi, N. (2022). Debat Pemikiran dan Pergulatan Filsafat Moderen. YASIN, 2(3), 408-427. https://doi.org/10.58578/yasin.v2i3.480

Most read articles by the same author(s)