Digital Readiness Mahasiswa dalam Menghadapi Transformasi Pembelajaran Berbasis Artificial Intelligence: Studi Kasus pada Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Agama Islam Students' Digital Readiness in Facing Artificial Intelligence-Based Learning Transformation: A Case Study of Students in the Islamic Religious Education Study Program
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
4756-4773
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/yasin.v6i4.11092
Viewed: 8 times
Downloaded: 4 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Lathifatur Rasyidah1*, Alfi Rahmi2 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Students’ digital readiness in facing the transformation of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based learning has become a focus of various studies, but research that specifically discusses the digital readiness of students in the Islamic Religious Education Study Program in the context of AI implementation remains limited. This study aims to explore the digital readiness of students in the Islamic Religious Education Study Program in facing the transformation of AI-based learning. This study used a qualitative approach with a case study design, involving 12 informants selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation, and were then analyzed using thematic analysis through the stages of data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing and verification. The results show that students have relatively good digital readiness, as indicated by their ability to use digital technology and various AI applications to support learning, their ability to adapt to learning transformation, and their awareness of the importance of using technology ethically. However, several challenges were still found, namely limitations in constructing effective prompts, difficulty verifying the accuracy of information, and the tendency of some students to depend on AI outputs. The conclusion of this study emphasizes that strengthening digital competence, AI literacy, and digital ethics is an important foundation for supporting learning transformation in higher education. These findings contribute to the development of the concept of digital readiness in the context of Islamic Religious Education and provide practical implications for universities in designing more targeted programs to strengthen students’ digital competence.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Bond, M., Khosravi, H., De Vries, P., Elliott, D., & Gašević, D. (2024). Artificial intelligence in higher education: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence.
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Guest, G., Namey, E., & Chen, M. (2020). A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. PLOS ONE, 15(5), Article e0232076. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232076
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2023). Transformasi digital pendidikan tinggi.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Machado, L. J., & Chung, C. J. (2015). Integrating technology: The principals’ role and effect. International Education Studies, 8(5), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n5p43
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386693
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, Article 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. SAGE Publications.
van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2019). Determinants of 21st-century digital skills: A large-scale survey among working professionals. Computers in Human Behavior, 100, 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.06.017
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education—Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0