Pembentukan Bakat dan Minat Peserta Didik melalui Lingkungan Keluarga: Studi Kasus dalam Perspektif Psikologi Perkembangan Formation of Students’ Talents and Interests through the Family Environment: A Case Study from the Perspective of Developmental Psychology
Main Article Content
Abstract
The formation of students’ talents and interests through the family environment has received attention in various studies in developmental psychology and education; however, studies that specifically explore the mechanisms through which both are formed through family interaction from the perspective of developmental psychology remain limited. This study aims to explore the role of the family environment in shaping students’ talents and interests and to identify the factors that support this developmental process. This study employed a qualitative approach with a case study design, involving 15 informants consisting of students, parents, and teachers selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation, and were then analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings show that family emotional support, parenting patterns that provide space for exploration, open communication, the provision of learning facilities, and collaboration between families and schools are the main factors supporting the development of students’ talents and interests. These findings also indicate that the quality of interaction within the family has a greater influence than material support alone in encouraging the actualization of children’s potential. The conclusion of this study affirms that the family environment plays a strategic role in shaping students’ talents and interests through emotional support, effective communication, and synergy with schools. The implications of this study provide a theoretical contribution to the development of studies in developmental psychology, as well as a practical reference for parents, teachers, and educational institutions in designing parenting patterns and collaborative programs that optimally support students’ development. Future research is recommended to examine this phenomenon through a mixed-methods approach or a longitudinal design in more diverse contexts.
Downloads
Article Details

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Bornstein, M. H. (2022). The nature and structure of mothers’ parenting their infants. Parenting, 22(2), 83–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295192.2022.2057799
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE.
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 793–828). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0114
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
Jackson, K., & Bazeley, P. (2023). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo (4th ed.). SAGE.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Papalia, D. E., & Martorell, G. (2023). Experience human development (15th ed.). McGraw Hill.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, Article 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
Tudge, J. R. H., Mokrova, I., Hatfield, B. E., & Karnik, R. B. (2009). Uses and misuses of Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological theory of human development. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 1(4), 198–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2009.00026.x
UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education—A tool on whose terms? UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54676/UZQV8501
Wang, M.-T., & Eccles, J. S. (2016). Multilevel predictors of math classroom engagement and achievement. Child Development, 87(2), 633–649.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE.




















