Konstruksi Kecerdasan Intelektual Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Perspektif Psikologi Islam: Kajian Fenomenologis terhadap Aktualisasi Potensi Akal Construction of Students’ Intellectual Intelligence Based on the Perspective of Islamic Psychology: A Phenomenological Study of the Actualization of the Potential of Reason
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
4470-4492
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/yasin.v6i4.11051
Viewed: 0 times
Downloaded: 0 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Nur Hasanah Harahapi1*, Alfi Rahmi2 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
The construction of students’ intellectual intelligence has received attention in various previous studies; however, research that specifically discusses the actualization of the potential of reason from the perspective of Islamic psychology through a phenomenological approach remains limited. Most studies still define intellectual intelligence as a cognitive ability measured through academic achievement or Intelligence Quotient (IQ), and therefore have not provided a comprehensive understanding of the relationship between the function of reason, spirituality, and character formation. This study aims to explore and analyze the construction of students’ intellectual intelligence from the perspective of Islamic psychology through the experience of actualizing the potential of reason. This study used a qualitative approach with an interpretative phenomenological design, involving 15 student participants selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, documentation, and reflective notes, and were then analyzed using phenomenological thematic analysis through the stages of coding, categorization, and theme interpretation. The findings show that intellectual intelligence from the perspective of Islamic psychology is constructed through five main dimensions, namely reason as a divine trust, the integration of rational thinking and spiritual awareness, self-reflection as a mechanism for intellectual strengthening, the actualization of intelligence through ethical behavior, and the influence of obstacles in optimizing the potential of reason. These findings contribute to the development of the concept of Islamic psychology by presenting a holistic model of intellectual intelligence and expanding understanding of the relationship among cognitive, spiritual, and moral dimensions in education. The conclusion of this study affirms the importance of integrating the function of reason and Islamic values in shaping students’ intelligence. The implications of this study include a theoretical contribution to the development of Islamic educational psychology and a practical reference for educational institutions in designing learning that integrates intellectual, spiritual, and character development. This study also opens opportunities for further research on the development of instruments for measuring intellectual intelligence based on Islamic psychology and their implementation at various levels of education.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Al-Attas, S. M. N. (2019). Islam and secularism. Ta’dib International.
Angrosino, M. V. (2016). Naturalistic observation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315423616
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
Deary, I. J. (2020). Intelligence: A very short introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Finlay, L. (2021). The phenomenology of research practice.
Grossmann, I., Weststrate, N. M., Ardelt, M., Brienza, J. P., Dong, M., Ferrari, M., Fournier, M. A., Hu, C. S., Nusbaum, H. C., & Vervaeke, J. (2020). The science of wisdom in a polarized world: Knowns and unknowns. Psychological Inquiry, 31(2), 103–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2020.1750917
Haque, A. (2018). Psychology from an Islamic perspective. In S. Fernando & R. Moodley (Eds.), Global psychologies: Mental health and the Global South (pp. 137–150). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95816-0_8
Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, Article 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523
Immordino-Yang, M. H. (2015). Emotions, learning, and the brain: Exploring the educational implications of affective neuroscience. W. W. Norton & Company.
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. (2022). Kurikulum Merdeka. https://kurikulum.kemdikbud.go.id/kurikulum-merdeka/
Lincoln, Y. S., Guba, E. G., & Shannon-Baker, P. (2021). Trustworthiness and naturalistic inquiry.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995658
Nasr, S. H. (1989). Knowledge and the sacred. State University of New York Press.
Neubauer, B. E., Witkop, C. T., & Varpio, L. (2019). How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others. Perspectives on Medical Education, 8(2), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-0509-2
OECD. (2019). OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030: OECD Learning Compass 2030: A series of concept notes. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/about/projects/edu/education-2040/1-1-learning-compass/OECD_Learning_Compass_2030_Concept_Note_Series.pdf
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE.
Rothman, A., & Coyle, A. (2018). Toward a framework for Islamic psychology and psychotherapy: An Islamic model of the soul. Journal of Religion and Health, 57(5), 1731–1744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-018-0651-x
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). SAGE.
Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52, 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02212307
Seligman, M. E. P. (2019). Positive psychology: A personal history. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 15, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095653
Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2022). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research (2nd ed.). SAGE.
Sternberg, R. J. (2021). Adaptive intelligence: Surviving and thriving in times of uncertainty. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316650554
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE.