Scrolling vs Studying: Dampak Cyberloafing terhadap Student Engagement Mahasiswa dalam Perkuliahan Daring
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
2609-2603
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/yasin.v6i3.10044
Viewed: 29 times
Downloaded: 25 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Fathimah Az Zahra1, Indriyani Santoso2 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
The phenomenon of cyberloafing in online lectures has become an issue that can affect students’ academic engagement, particularly in the context of digital learning. Although this issue has received attention in educational studies and academic psychology, research that specifically examines the relationship between cyberloafing and student engagement among students who actively participate in online lectures still needs to be strengthened. This study aims to analyze the relationship between cyberloafing and student engagement among students undergoing online lectures. This study used a quantitative approach with a correlational design, involving 84 students selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using a cyberloafing scale and a student engagement scale, and were then analyzed using Pearson Product-Moment correlation. The results showed that the level of cyberloafing was in the low-to-moderate category, with a mean score of M = 53.01 from a theoretical range of 20–100, whereas student engagement was in the moderate-to-high category, with a mean score of M = 76.52 from a theoretical range of 24–120. The correlation analysis results indicated a significant negative relationship between cyberloafing and student engagement, with r = -0.422 and p = 0.000. These findings indicate that the higher students’ involvement in non-academic activities during online lectures, such as accessing social media or playing games, the lower their engagement in learning. The conclusion of this study emphasizes the importance of controlling cyberloafing to maintain students’ academic engagement. The implications of this study suggest that lecturers and educational institutions should design more interactive online learning and encourage students’ self-regulation so that learning engagement can be maintained.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2023). COVID-19 pandemic and online learning: The challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 863–875. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180
Askew, K., Buckner, J. E., Taing, M. U., Ilie, A., Bauer, J. A., & Coovert, M. D. (2014). Explaining cyberloafing: The role of the theory of planned behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 510–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.006
Chen, M., & Zhang, X. (2024). Factors influencing internet addiction among university students: The mediating roles of self-control and anxiety. Acta Psychologica, 250, Article 104535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104535
Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. R. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Self processes and development: The Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 43–77). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1991-97029-002
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Dixson, M. D. (2015). Measuring student engagement in the online course: The Online Student Engagement Scale (OSE). Online Learning, 19(4), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i4.561
Feni Haryati, L., & Nursaptini, N. (2021). Konferensi Video sebagai Alternatif Media Pembelajaran pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. AL MA’ARIEF: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial dan Budaya, 3(2), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.35905/almaarief.v3i2.2477
Handikasari, R. H., Jusuf, I., & Johan, A. (2018). Hubungan Intensitas Penggunaan Media Sosial dengan Gejala Depresi Mahasiswa Kedokteran: Studi pada Mahasiswa Kedokteran Tingkat Akhir yang Menggunakan Kurikulum Modul Terintegrasi. Diponegoro Medical Journal (Jurnal Kedokteran Diponegoro), 7(2), 919–934. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/medico/article/view/20790
Harnani, N., Amijaya, D. T., & Ahmadi, R. S. (2024). Kejenuhan Belajar Pengaruhnya terhadap Minat Belajar Mahasiswa selama Pandemi Covid-19. Techno-Socio Ekonomika, 17(1), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.32897/techno.2024.17.1.2860
Junco, R. (2012). Too much face and not enough books: The relationship between multiple indices of Facebook use and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.026
Kahu, E. R., & Nelson, K. (2018). Student engagement in the educational interface: Understanding the mechanisms of student success. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(1), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197
Lu, X., Wang, Y., Chen, X., & Lu, Q. (2024). From stress to screen: Understanding cyberloafing through cognitive and affective pathways. Behavioral Sciences, 14(3), Article 249. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14030249
Mark, G., Gudith, D., & Klocke, U. (2008). The cost of interrupted work: More speed and stress. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 107–110). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357072
Marks, H. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 153–184. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312037001153
Muntean, C. I. (2011). Raising engagement in e-learning through gamification. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Virtual Learning ICVL 2011 (pp. 323–329). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8133016
Mustofa, M. I., Chodzirin, M., Sayekti, L., & Fauzan, R. (2019). Formulasi Model Perkuliahan Daring sebagai Upaya Menekan Disparitas Kualitas Perguruan Tinggi. Walisongo Journal of Information Technology, 1(2), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.21580/wjit.2019.1.2.4067
Nopriyeni, N., Lestari, F. A., Irwandi, I., & Hartati, M. S. (2022). Efektifitas Pembelajaran Daring Berbasis Google Classroom pada Masa Covid-19 di Sekolah Menengah Atas. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(4), 6092–6100. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i4.3667
Prasad, S., Gupta, I. C., & Totala, N. K. (2017). Social media usage, electronic word of mouth and purchase-decision involvement. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 9(2), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-06-2016-0063
Putri, M., Kuntarto, E., & Alirmansyah, A. (2021). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Daring di Era Pandemi: Studi Kasus pada Siswa Kelas III Sekolah Dasar. AULADUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Islam, 8(1), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.24252/auladuna.v8i1a8.2021
Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149–172). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_7
Rohana, S. (2020). Model Pembelajaran Daring Pasca Pandemi Covid-19. At-Ta’dib: Jurnal Ilmiah Prodi Pendidikan Agama Islam, 12(2), 192–208. https://doi.org/10.47498/tadib.v12i02.441
Sarıtepeci, M., & Sert, U. (2021). Cyberloafing level of university students: A scale development study. Research on Education and Psychology, 5(1), 41–52. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/rep/issue/63330/919481
Talan, T., Dogan, Y., & Kalinkara, Y. (2023). Relationships between smartphone addiction, academic performance, life satisfaction, hopelessness and cyberloafing among university undergraduate students. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 19(4), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.19.4.19429
Winarsunu, T. (2009). Statistik dalam penelitian psikologi dan pendidikan. UMM Press.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2