Gold Rush 2.0: US Defense Political Economy Amid Dollar Decline and Bullion Rise
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
1102-1122
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ijhess.v3i3.7395
Viewed: 427 times
Downloaded: 295 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Yohana Meyrida Simamora1*, Anak Agung Banyu Perwita2, Oktaheroe Ramsi3 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
The global financial system is undergoing a profound shift that challenges the reserve currency dominance of the US dollar, driven by escalating national debt, persistent inflation, and intensifying geopolitical tensions. This environment has triggered what can be described as “Gold Rush 2.0,” marked by rising gold prices and declining confidence in fiat currencies. A critical inflection point is evident in the fact that US debt servicing costs ($970 billion in FY2024) have surpassed defense spending ($886 billion), crossing the so-called “Ferguson Limit,” where great powers face heightened risks of decline. This fiscal strain is further compounded by the “Triffin Dilemma,” which requires persistent trade deficits to sustain global dollar liquidity while simultaneously eroding confidence in the currency and deepening debt accumulation. Against this backdrop, the study examines how these dynamics reshape the US defense political economy by constraining budgetary flexibility, hindering modernization, and influencing strategic priorities. Empirical analysis reveals a negative correlation between rising debt servicing obligations and defense budget growth, alongside evidence of central banks increasing gold reserves as a sign of de-dollarization. The study concludes that weakening US economic hegemony carries significant implications for national security and global stability, underscoring the need for strategic recalibration in defense and fiscal policy.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Arslanalp, S., Simpson-Bell, C., & Eichengreen, B. (2023). Gold as International Reserves: A Barbarous Relic No More? IMF Working Papers, 2023(014), 1. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400229947.001
Atesoglu, H. S. (2009). Defense spending and aggregate output in the United States. Defence and Peace Economics, 20(1), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242690701775533
Banerjee, A. K., Sensoy, A., & Goodell, J. W. (2024). Volatility connectedness between geopolitical risk and financial markets: Insights from pandemic and military crisis periods. International Review of Economics & Finance, 96, 103740. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103740
Chahrour, R., & Valchev, R. (2024). The Dollar in an Era of International Retrenchment. IMF Economic Review, 72(3), 1042–1080. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41308-024-00252-z
Chary, S., & Singh, N. (2024). On the role of military spending: an economic thought perspective. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2350837
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.
Gentilucci, E. (2019). US Military Spending: A Perspective on the Restructuring Dynamics of the Defense Sector. Review of Radical Political Economics, 51(4), 606–628. https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613419844641
Ghozali, I. (2014). Structural Equation Modeling; Metode Alternatif Dengan Partial Least Square (PLS) (4th ed.). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Gold, D., & Adams, G. (1990). Defence spending and the American economy. Defence Economics, 1(4), 275–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/10430719008404668
Goldstein, J. S. (1993). The Political Economy of Military Spending in the United States. Edited by Alex Mintz. New York: Routledge, Chapman, and Hall 1992. 334p. $65.00. In American Political Science Review (Vol. 87, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.2307/2938804
Heo, U. (2010). The Relationship between Defense Spending and Economic Growth in the United States. Political Research Quarterly, 63(4), 760–770. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25749247
Liu, Z., Zhang, J., Gu, R., Hu, Q., & He, S. (2025). Driving effects of U.S. monetary policy and geopolitical risks on gold reserve share. International Review of Financial Analysis, 105, 104391. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104391
Mamcarz, K. (2016). Investment Demand on the Bullion Market. Folia Oeconomica, 4(323), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.323.09
Ngo, V. M., Nguyen, P. Van, & Hoang, Y. H. (2024). The impacts of geopolitical risks on gold, oil and financial reserve management. Resources Policy, 90, 104688. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104688
Reilly, C. (2023). The Political Economy of Rising Defense Costs. SSRN Electronic Journal, 22030(858). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4369733
Shah, M. U., Gill, Q. S., Akhtar, M. N., & Mustafa, G. (2024). Understanding the Decline of the US Dollar: Key Factors and Implications. Journal of Social & Organizational Matters, 3(2), 234–250. https://doi.org/10.56976/jsom.v3i2.81
Sugiyono. (2024). Metode Penelitian Kuantitati, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Torres, J. L. (2020). The production of national defense and the macroeconomy. PLoS ONE, 15(10 October), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240299
Wang, Y. (2023). Defense Budget Growth and Inflation: A Wavelet-Based Study of the U.S. and Britain. Political Studies Review, 21(2), 260–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/14789299211068407
Zeng, Y., & Dür, A. (2025). Shock and awe: Economic sanctions and relative military spending. Journal of Peace Research, 1(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/00223433251331486