Scramble and Partitions for the Colonies of English, French, German, and Portuguese: A New Historicism Study of the African Continent

Main Article Content

Abdulkarim Usman
Yusuf Ismail Imam

Abstract

This paper examines the scramble and partition of West African territories by European superpowers during the final two decades of the 19th century—a period that marked a turning point in the political and historical trajectory of the region. Drawing on secondary sources, the study analyzes the geopolitical rivalries and diplomatic tensions among major European powers, particularly Britain and France, in their quest to assert territorial control. It highlights key episodes, such as the Anglo-French conflict over South Africa, the disputes surrounding Egypt and the Gold Coast (present-day Ghana), and the broader imperial competition that fueled colonial expansion. The paper explores the underlying causes of the scramble, including economic interests, strategic rivalries, and national prestige, as well as the outcomes and consequences of the partition. Particular attention is given to the Berlin Conference of 1884–1885, which formalized European claims and codified rules for territorial acquisition, and to African resistance movements that challenged colonial imposition. The study concludes that the scramble and partition had profound and lasting effects on the political boundaries, governance structures, and socio-economic development of West African states. It recommends the promotion of civic education, political reforms, and pan-African engagement as pathways to restoring and safeguarding the continent’s autonomy and development, with specific reference to the Nigerian context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Scopus Citation Data

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Skelton J. (2027)
    Linguistic and conceptual transfer: Crosslinguistic translanguaging in the English-French bilingual mathematics classroom in the UK
    Mathematics Enthusiast, 24(1), 47-68
  2. Ngo T.Q. (2027)
    Enhancing dependency parsing with graph neural network-learned embeddings from universal dependency treebanks
    Computer Speech and Language, 101
  3. Das B. (2027)
    Citizenship on Trial: The NRC, Exclusion, and the Making of Foreigners in Assam, India
    Journal of Population and Social Studies, 35, 247-267

Article Details

How to Cite
Usman, A., & Imam, Y. I. (2025). Scramble and Partitions for the Colonies of English, French, German, and Portuguese: A New Historicism Study of the African Continent. International Journal of Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences, 3(3), 1412-1424. https://doi.org/10.58578/ijhess.v3i3.7634

References

John M. MacKenzie, (2005). The Partition of Africa 1880–1900 and European Imperialism in the Nineteenth Century.

Gerits k, (2014). The Ideological Scramble for Africa The US, Ghanaian, French and British Competition for Africa's Future, 1953-1963

Matt Rosenberg, (2017) Berlin Conference of 1884-1885 to Divide Africa Adapted http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Berlin_Conference_of_1884-85

http://historyproject.ucdavis.edu/ic/image_details.php?id=13906

J. A. (1999) A Brief History of the Berlin Conference.

Boahen, A. Adu. (1971) The Horizon History of Africa. United States: American Heritages Publishing Company.

General Act of the Berlin Conference on West Africa, 26 February 1885

Ismaila A. Tsiga, (2010) Apartheid and the Rise of Black Autobiography Tradition in South Africa.

Uzoigwe, G. N. (1985). European Partition and Conquest of Africa: an Overview, in: Boahen, A. A (ed.) General History of Africa – VII: Africa under Colonial Domination 18801935, pp. 19-44.

Jutta Bolt (2012) The History of African Development and The Partitioning of Africa Groningen University.

Xiaotang Lyu. (2021) An Introduction to New Historicism.


Explore Our Journals
Find the most suitable journal for your research. If this journal does not fully align with the scope of your manuscript, we invite you to explore our wider portfolio of journals covering diverse fields of study. Please select one of the journals below to identify the most appropriate publication platform for your work.