Hedging through Defense Diplomacy: Indonesia’s Non-Alignment in the Age of Emerging Technologies
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
1340-1355
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ajstea.v3i4.7112
Viewed: 1.006 times
Downloaded: 268 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Sekar Hesti Suminar1*, Anak Agung Banyu Perwita2, Oktaheroe Ramsi3 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Indonesia’s long-standing doctrine of a “free and active” foreign policy is increasingly reinterpreted in the 21st century as a strategic hedging approach, enabling the state to navigate intensifying great-power competition and rapid technological change. This study examines the emergence of defense diplomacy as a core instrument of Indonesia’s hedging strategy, allowing engagement with major powers and access to evolving defense technologies without compromising its non-aligned identity. Using a qualitative case study method, the research contrasts two key partnerships: the PT Len–Thales combat management system contract, representing Indonesia’s engagement with Western technology, and the ongoing Indonesia–India BrahMos missile negotiations, exemplifying diversification beyond traditional suppliers. The findings demonstrate that cultivating diverse, well-managed defense relationships mitigates overdependence on a single partner, enhances indigenous technological capacity, and advances strategic autonomy. This analysis argues that Indonesia’s hedging constitutes a contemporary articulation of non-alignment, reconciling normative commitments to sovereignty with pragmatic uncertainty management amid emerging technologies. By situating this dynamic within the broader framework of middle power diplomacy in the Indo-Pacific, the study underscores the growing relevance of defense diplomacy in safeguarding national interests in a fluid and contested geopolitical environment.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Ambarwati, E., Mahroza, J., & Supandi, S. (2022). Strategi hedging dalam mendukung diplomasi pertahanan Indonesia (Studi kasus: alih teknologi rudal C-705). Jurnal Diplomasi Pertahanan, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.33172/jdp.v5i1.362
Diplomat, T. (2025). Indonesia’s interest in India’s BrahMos: More than just a missile deal. https://thediplomat.com/2025/02/indonesias-interest-in-indias-brahmos-more-than-just-a-missile-deal
Drab, L. (2018). Defence diplomacy – an important tool for the implementation of foreign policy and security of the state. Security and Defence Quarterly, 20(3), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0012.5152
Express, N. I. (2025). Indonesia initiates $450 mn BrahMos missile export deal. https://www.newindianexpress.com
Gindarsah, I. (2015). Indonesia’s defence diplomacy: Harnessing the hedging strategy against regional uncertainties. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/104945
Hartanto, Y. A. (2025). How effective is Indonesia’s strategic hedging approach? Jurnal Pertahanan Dan Bela Negara, 12(1), 1–20. https://jurnal.idu.ac.id/index.php/JPBH/article/view/19841
Indonesian Ministry of Defence. (2024). DEFEND ID initiative: Strengthening Indonesia’s defense industrial base. Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Indonesia. https://www.kemhan.go.id
Kuik, C.-C. (2016). The essence of hedging: Malaysia and Singapore’s response to a rising China. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 30(2), 159–185. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs30-2a
Kusumadewi, H., & Wiswayana, W. M. (2024). Multilevel hedging for middle regional power: Indonesia’s ascent toward powerhood through hedging. Indonesian Journal of International Relations, 8(2), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.32787/ijir.v8i2.591
Larosa, T. (2017). The Future Defense System for the Indonesian Nation State. Jurnal Pertahanan, 3(3), 261. https://doi.org/10.33172/jp.v3i3.237
Majumdar, O. (2024). Thales, PT Len partner to deliver radars, C2 systems to Indonesian Air Force. Janes. https://www.janes.com/osint-insights/defence-news/c4isr/thales-pt-len-partner-to-deliver-radars-c2-systems-to-indonesian-air-force
News, A. P. (2025). Thales boosts Indonesian defense with new joint venture. https://apnews.com/article/f60cb55369617640a78601494e1a1881
Pramono, B. (2020). Defense diplomacy and country existence. International Affairs and Global Strategy, 87, Article 05. https://doi.org/10.7176/iags/87 05
Riyadi, F. A., & Dewi, I. M. (2022). The role of defense diplomacy for the development of the Indonesian defense industry. Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis & Entrepreneurship, 16(1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.55208/jebe.v16i1.249
Samingan, M. (2025). The defense economic strategy through diplomacy aims to increase defense entrepreneurship for a globally competitive Golden Indonesia in 2045. Jurnal Pertahanan dan Bela Negara. https://jurnal.idu.ac.id/index.php/JPBH/article/view/19632
Sarjito, A., & Perwita, A. A. B. (2024). Safeguarding the nations: Sasaran dan strategi diplomasi pertahanan. Indonesia Emas Group.
Strangio, S. (2023). Indonesia close to closing deal for BrahMos weapons system: Report. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2023/03/indonesia-close-to-closing-deal-for-brahmos-weapons-system-report
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sukmawan, D. I., & Pedrason, R. (2023). Assertively hedging? Indonesia’s motives and practices in the South China Sea. Intermestic: Journal of International Studies, 7(2), 701–720. https://doi.org/10.24198/intermestic.v7n2.15
Syailendra, E. A. (2017). A nonbalancing act: Explaining Indonesia’s failure to balance against the Chinese threat. Asian Security, 13(3), 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2017.1365489
Thales. (2023). Thales to reinforce Indonesia’s sovereign airspace protection capabilities with PT Len. In Thales Group. https://www.thalesgroup.com/en/worldwide/defence-and-security/press_release/thales-reinforce-indonesias-sovereign-airspace
Thales. (2024). PT Len and Thales sign joint venture agreement to strengthen Indonesian defense industry. In Thales Group. https://www.thalesgroup.com/en/worldwide/defence-and-security/press_release/pt-len-and-thales-sign-jv-agreement
The Diplomat. (2025). Indonesia’s interest in India’s BrahMos: More than just a missile deal. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2025/02/indonesias-interest-in-indias-brahmos-more-than-just-a-missile-deal
Times, H. (2025). India, Russia and Indonesia agree on pricing of BrahMos deal. https://www.hindustantimes.com
Tiola, A. (2021). Indonesia’s China and US approach: Crafting policies out of standard operating procedures. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 43(3), 306–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/23477970211041662
Tribune, T. (2025). Why Indonesia is holding up the BrahMos deal. The Tribune India. https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/comment/why-indonesia-is-holding-up-brahmos-dea
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.