ASEAN Defense Diplomacy: Navigating US Tariffs and South China Sea Tensions
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
655-671
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ijemt.v3i2.7054
Viewed: 425 times
Downloaded: 229 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Darma Eka Saputra1*, Anak Agung Banyu Perwita2, Yermia Hendarwoto3 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper examines the evolution of ASEAN defense diplomacy in response to two major geopolitical challenges: the 2018 U.S.–China trade war and China’s increasing assertiveness in the South China Sea, with a specific focus on the Scarborough Shoal standoff. Utilizing a qualitative research approach, the study analyzes ASEAN’s institutional frameworks namely the ASEAN Defense Ministers' Meeting (ADMM), ADMM-Plus, and the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) to explore how defense diplomacy functions alongside economic strategies. The findings suggest that ASEAN’s defense diplomacy serves a stabilizing role by fostering regional unity, facilitating strategic hedging, and sustaining military communication channels amid escalating trade and maritime tensions. The study argues that ASEAN’s dual engagement with both the U.S. and China, despite the limitations of consensus-based diplomacy, enables the bloc to avoid alignment traps and enhances its collective resilience against external coercion. Ultimately, ASEAN defense diplomacy, though institutionally constrained, proves to be a vital instrument for maintaining strategic balance, upholding regional stability, and reinforcing the rules-based international order.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Bown, C. P. (2021). The US–China trade war and Phase One agreement. Journal of Policy Modeling, 43(4), 805–843. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2021.02.009
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brunnstrom, D., & Lema, K. (2025). Philippines’ Marcos to meet Trump, hoping to secure trade deal that is favourable to both allied countries. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/china/philippines-marcos-meet-trump-hoping-secure-trade-deal-2025-07-21/
Cardno, C. (2019). Policy Document Analysis: A Practical Educational Leadership Tool and a Qualitative Research Method. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 24(4), 623–640. https://doi.org/10.14527/kuey.2018.016
Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545–547. https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.545-547
Chao, W.-C. (2023). The Political Economy of the Philippines and Its Development Strategy under China-USA Power Rivalry and Hegemonic Competition: Hedge with Balance. The Chinese Economy, 56(4), 292–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/10971475.2022.2136694
Cho, I. H. (2025). Hegemony and Legitimacy: US-China Competition in a Contested Indo-Pacifi. Pacific Affairs, 98(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.5509/2025981-art3
Dixit, P. (2024). ASEAN’S Balancing Act: Navigating Relations With US-China in Southeast Asia. International Journal of Novel Research and Development (IJNRD), 9(4), 533–536. https://doi.org/10.49475/Ijnrd.194.v2194.13
Enfu, C., & Jing, L. (2024). Changes in U.S. Grand Strategy in the Indo-Pacific and China’s Countermeasures. Monthly Review (New York. 1949), 76(3), 24–48. https://doi.org/10.14452/MR-076-03-2024-07_2
Hu, L. (2023). Examining ASEAN’s effectiveness in managing South China Sea disputes. Pacific Review, 36(1), 119–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2021.1934519
Iida, K. (2024). The Political Economy of Supply Chain Transformation in Asia: From “China Plus One” to De-Sinicization. Asia Policy, 19(3), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2024.a934566
Lum, T., Dolven, B., Manyin, M. E., Martin, M. F., & Vaughn, B. (2011). United States Relations With The Association Of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean). Current Politics and Economics of South, Southeastern, and Central Asia, 20(2), 247.
Navy, U. S. (2019). ADMM-Plus Exercise Strengthens Maritime Security. https://www.navy.mil/Press-Office/Press-Releases/display-pressreleases/Article/2237923/admm-plus-exercise-strengthens-maritime-security/
Oberhauser, M. (2023). The Chinese belt and road initiative: development project with strings attached? International Journal of Development Issues, 23(2), 212–244. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDI-03-2023-0073
Pangemanan, A., Ibrahim, A., Suryanti, B. T., Hermansah, F., & Putra, P. R. B. (2021). Upaya Diplomasi Pertahanan ASEAN Di Laut Cina Selatan (ASEAN Defense Diplomacy Efforts in the South China Sea). Jurnal Diplomasi Pertahanan, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.33172/jdp.v7i2.727
Pangestu, M., & Armstrong, S. (2025). Southeast Asia central to global trade response. In East Asia Forum. East Asia Forum. https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2025/04/25/southeast-asia-central-to-global trade-response/
Po, S. (2023). Navigating the Storm: How ASEAN Managed the Great Power Competition Through the ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific. Journal of Accounting Finance Economics and Social Sciences, 8(2), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.62458/jafess.160224.8(2)23-37
Putra, B. A. (2024). Malaysia’s “Triadic Maritime Diplomacy” Strategy in the South China Sea. All Azimuth, 13(2), 166–192. https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.1455442
Qingly, W. H. E., & Ramasamy, H. (2020). Naming and Shaming China: America’s Strategy of Rhetorical Coercion in the South China Sea. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 42(3), 317–345. https://doi.org/10.1355/CS42-3a
Saidin, M. I. S., & Mustaza, S. (2020). ASEAN, China and the South China Sea Territorial Disputes: Analysis of Conflict Management Strategies. 28, 577–598.
Short, J. R. (2025). ASEAN Hedgings in the South China Sea (1st ed., pp. 71–89). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003537298-5
Teixeira, V. A. G. (2021). The Hegemony’s Contest in the South China Sea. SAGE Open, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211031216
Yuan, S. (2023). Tracing China’s diplomatic transition to wolf warrior diplomacy and its implications. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 837–839. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02367-6
Zekos, G. I. (2003). MNEs, globalisation and digital economy: legal and economic aspects. Managerial Law, 45(1–2), 1–296. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090550310770875
Zreik, M. (2022). The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) for the Asia–Pacific region and world. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 40(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-02-2022-0035