Hedging at Sea: Indonesia–Russia Defense Diplomacy through ORRUDA 2024 in the Indo-Pacific
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
1356-1369
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ajstea.v3i4.7123
Viewed: 475 times
Downloaded: 225 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Nia Norlyanti1*, Anak Agung Banyu Perwita2, Yermia Hendarwoto3 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Amid intensifying great-power rivalries in the Indo-Pacific, Indonesia’s defense strategy has shifted toward multidirectional engagement to preserve strategic autonomy without committing to any single bloc. This study examines the strategic significance of the ORRUDA 2024 joint naval exercise between Indonesia and Russia as a case of defense diplomacy within a hedging framework. Drawing on neorealism, hedging theory, and the actor–process–issue model of defense diplomacy, the research adopts a qualitative case study approach that integrates primary sources, including press releases and official statements, with secondary scholarly literature. The findings reveal that ORRUDA operates both as a balancing mechanism against U.S.-led regional security architectures such as AUKUS and the Quad, and as a diplomatic signal affirming Indonesia’s bebas-aktif foreign policy. The exercise strengthens operational cooperation with non-Western partners, reinforces national security, and contributes to regional stability. It also demonstrates the utility of defense diplomacy as a non-aligned, peacetime instrument of strategic statecraft involving coordinated planning, communication, and issue-specific collaboration. Overall, the analysis underscores the role of calibrated, non-provocative military engagement in managing geopolitical uncertainty and highlights the importance of diversifying defense partnerships and enhancing strategic communication to sustain Indonesia’s agency in a contested Indo-Pacific environment.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Anwar, D. F. (2020). Indonesia’s foreign policy and the Indo-Pacific. In J. Reuter (Ed.), The Indo-Pacific: Regional dynamics in the 21st century (pp. 93–108). Routledge.
Anwar, D. F. (2022). Indonesia’s hedging plus policy in the face of China’s rise and the US–China rivalry. The Pacific Review, 36(2), 351–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2022.2160794
Bueger, C., & Edmunds, T. (2017). Beyond seablindness: A new agenda for maritime security studies. International Affairs, 93(6), 1293–1311. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix174
Cottey, A., & Forster, A. (2004). Reshaping defense diplomacy: New roles for military cooperation and assistance (No. 365; Adelphi Paper).
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.
Drab, L. (2018). Defense diplomacy: An important tool for the implementation of foreign policy and security. Security and Defence Quarterly, 22(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0011.8202
Emmers, R. (2013). Security strategies of middle powers in the Asia-Pacific. In R. Emmers (Ed.), Middle Powers and the Rise of China (pp. 85–103). Routledge.
Gindarsah, I. (2015). Indonesia’s defence diplomacy: Harnessing the hedging strategy against regional uncertainties.
Goh, E. (2005). Meeting the China challenge: The U.S. in Southeast Asian regional security strategies.
Goh, E. (2007). Great powers and hierarchical order in Southeast Asia: Analyzing regional security strategies. International Security, 32(3), 113–157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.2008.32.3.113
Hartanto, Y. A. (2025). How effective is Indonesia’s strategic hedging approach? Jurnal Pertahanan Dan Bela Negara, 12(1), 1–20.
Inkiriwang, K. (2022). Indonesia’s strategic balancing and joint military exercises in the Indo-Pacific. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 44(2), 241–262.
Jervis, R. (1978). Cooperation under the security dilemma. World Politics, 30(2), 167–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2009958
Kaplan, R. D. (2022). The United States and the South China Sea: Power, strategy, and conflict. Foreign Affairs.
Kompas. (2024, November). Latihan Bersama Orruda Wujud Netralitas Indonesia. Kompas.Id.
Kuik, C. C. (2008). The essence of hedging: Malaysia and Singapore’s response to a rising China. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 30(2), 159–185.
Laksmana, E. A. (2011). Defence diplomacy in Southeast Asia: Exploring the limits of the ideal type. Asian Security, 7(1), 18–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2011.563493
Le Miere, C. (2014). Maritime diplomacy in the 21st century: Drivers and challenges. Routledge.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. W. W. Norton & Company.
Medcalf, R. (2020). Indo-Pacific empire: China, America and the contest for the world’s pivotal region. Manchester University Press.
Ng, E. (2018). Defense diplomacy as statecraft: Navigating the balance between engagement and deterrence. The Pacific Review, 31(5), 603–623. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2017.1412598
O’Neil, A. (2004). Hedging, strategic uncertainty and the Indo-Pacific. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 4(3), 357–381. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/4.3.357
Perwita, A. A. B. (2024). No TitleDiplomasi Pertahanan: Aktor, Proses, dan Isu. Indonesia Emas Group.
Reid, A. (2015). Southeast Asia’s security strategies: Between hedging and bandwagoning. Asian Politics & Policy, 7(2), 199–219. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/aspp.12143
Sulaiman, Y. (2021). Indonesia’s defense partnerships and strategic alignment in the Indo-Pacific. Asian Security, 17(3), 243–265. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2021.1885609
Tan, S. S. (2013). Consigned to hedge: South-East Asia and America’s “pivot” to Asia. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 35(3), 317–345. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1355/cs35-3b
Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. McGraw-Hill.
White, H. (2019). How to defend Australia. La Trobe University Press.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.