Safeguarding Maritime Critical Infrastructure: Indonesia’s Defense Diplomacy in the Indo-Pacific Security Architecture under the Joko Widodo Administration (2014–2024)
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
1746-1768
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ajstea.v3i5.7607
Viewed: 92 times
Downloaded: 36 times
We cordially invite qualified professionals to join LYAS Publisher as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will contribute significantly to maintaining the quality of our publications. If you are interested, please complete the following form: Call for Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need more information about the submission process or have any further questions.
Authors:
Ita Nurjanah1*, Anak Agung Banyu Perwita2, Yermia Hendarwoto3 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Maritime critical infrastructure (MCI)—comprising undersea data cables, energy pipelines, ports, and shipping lanes—is essential to sustaining global economic stability and digital connectivity. This is particularly critical in Southeast Asia, a region marked by dense maritime traffic and rising geopolitical tensions, including hybrid threats. As the largest archipelagic state in the region, Indonesia plays a pivotal role in safeguarding the security and resilience of these infrastructures. This study analyzes Indonesia’s defense diplomacy in protecting MCI within the broader Indo-Pacific security architecture during the administration of President Joko Widodo (2014–2024). Anchored in Barry Buzan’s Regional Security Complex Theory (RSCT), alongside the concepts of hedging and defense diplomacy, the research employs a qualitative descriptive method to examine Indonesia’s strategic positioning. Findings indicate that Indonesia’s approach emphasizes diplomatic engagement, regional institutional cooperation, and strategic autonomy—enabling it to enhance infrastructure resilience while preserving neutrality amid intensifying U.S.–China rivalry. Key enablers include the adoption of technological innovation, improved inter-agency coordination, and multilateral defense partnerships. The study concludes that Indonesia’s defense diplomacy not only contributes to national infrastructure protection but also reinforces the stability of the Indo-Pacific maritime order.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Afpriyanto, A., Putra, N., Jupriyanto, J., & Sari, P. (2023). Critical role of maritime infrastructure in Indonesian defense logistics management towards the World Maritime Axis. International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS), 3(3). https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v3i3.657
Ardiyanti, D., & Mubarak, S. (2025). An overview of Japan–Indonesia maritime security in Indo-Pacific region. Indonesian Journal of International Relations, 9(1), 162–181. https://doi.org/10.32787/ijir.v9i1.495
Agastia, D. (2021). Joko Widodo’s fleeting maritime ambitions: An actor-specific analysis of Indonesia’s Global Maritime Fulcrum. Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, 8(3), 304–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/23477970211035892
Amable, S. (2022). Theorizing the emergence of security regions: An adaptation for the Regional Security Complex Theory. Global Studies Quarterly, 2(4), ksac065. https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksac065.
ASEAN Secretariat. (2019). ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat. https://www.asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/ASEAN-Outlook-on-the-Indo-Pacific_FINAL_22062019.pdf
ASEAN Secretariat. (2022). ASEAN Maritime Outlook 2022: Cooperation and Security in Southeast Asian Waters. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat. https://asean.org/book/asean-maritime-outlook/
Bradshaw, C., Atkinson, S., & Doody, O. (2017). Employing a qualitative descriptive approach in health care research. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 4, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393617742282
Bueger, C., & Edmunds, T. (2020). Blue crimes: Conceptualising transnational organised crime at sea. Marine Policy, 119, 104067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104067
Dorman, A. (2023). The Nord Stream sabotage and the future of undersea infrastructure security. Naval War College Review, 76(2), 85–104.
Drab, L., & Żakowska, M. (2024). Defense diplomacy as a tool for international stability: Contemporary trends and challenges. Security and Defence Quarterly, 46(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.35467/sdq/180978
Fita, R. (2025). Functional cooperation in the Indian Ocean Rim: Lessons from Indonesia’s trilateral diplomacy. Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs, 8(1), 88–106.
Goh, E. (2006). Understanding “hedging” in Asia-Pacific security. The Pacific Review, 18(3), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740500189041
Gusti, I., Dharma, B., Agastia, A., & Perwita, A. A. B. (2018). Building maritime domain awareness as an essential element of the Global Maritime Fulcrum: Challenges and prospects for Indonesia's maritime security. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 6(2), 2017-2018. https://doi.org/10.18196/hi.62116
Huang, M. (2024). Maritime infrastructure and strategic competition in the Indo-Pacific. Asian Security, 20(1), 77–93.
Inkiriwang, M. (2021). Indonesia’s maritime diplomacy and defense cooperation: Balancing autonomy and engagement. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 43(1), 89–112.
International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS). (2023). The military balance 2023. Routledge.
Jones, D., & Liu, K. (2023). Strategic congestion and maritime competition in the Indo-Pacific. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 53(2), 235–254.
Kementerian Pertahanan Republik Indonesia. (2023). Laporan tahunan pertahanan 2023. Jakarta: Kemenhan RI.
Kim, H. (2023). Cable vulnerability mapping near the Natuna Sea: Sensors and data integration. Ocean & Coastal Management, 239, 106571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2023.106571
Kim, H. S., Sefcik, J. S., & Bradway, C. (2017). Characteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: A systematic review. Research in Nursing & Health, 40(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21768
Kocak, B. (2022). The geopolitics of submarine data cables in Southeast Asia. Journal of Global Infrastructure Policy, 9(4), 215–229.
Lamont, C., & Boduszyński, M. (2022). Methodological pluralism in international relations: The case for qualitative descriptive approaches. International Studies Review, 24(2), 295–312.
Liang, Y. (2017). China’s maritime presence and regional perceptions in Southeast Asia. Asian Journal of Political Science, 25(3), 310–328.
Montratama, I. (2024). Indonesia’s Global Maritime Fulcrum: Policy evolution and strategic implications. Journal of Maritime Policy and Strategy, 12(1), 50–67.
Nurjanah, I., & Silaen, C.A. (2024). AUKUS-RI: The Answer for Indonesia’s Future Maritime Challenges Over the North Natuna Sea? Jurnal Lemhannas RI. https://doi.org/10.55960/jlri.v12i3.910
Novak, D. (2024). Cyber-physical vulnerabilities in undersea communication systems. Journal of Strategic Security Studies, 18(1), 27–46.
Pedrason, R., & Montratama, I. (2025). Defense diplomacy: Theoretical and strategic perspectives. Center for Strategic Studies, Universitas Pertahanan.
Putra, M. (2024). Indonesia’s Global Maritime Fulcrum and foreign policy autonomy. Journal of Southeast Asian Affairs, 51(2), 200–221.
Rahman, M. (2019). Climate risk and maritime infrastructure resilience in the Asia-Pacific. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(7), 911–928.
Raymaker, L., Ong, D., & Setiawan, A. (2025). Ocean sensor integration and undersea network resilience in the Indo-Pacific. Marine Technology Journal, 59(1), 21–39.
Roulston, K. (2022). Qualitative data analysis and interpretation. Qualitative Research Journal, 22(3), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-04-2021-0047
SEA-ME-WE Consortium. (2022). Asia-America Gateway outage and restoration report. Singapore: SEA-ME-WE Consortium.
Seno, B., & Ponto, E. (2025). Securitizing infrastructure in the Indo-Pacific: Indonesia’s maritime agenda and regional interdependence. Maritime Affairs: Journal of the National Maritime Foundation of India, 21(1), 78–96.
Silva, J., & Tan, M. (2021). ASEAN institutional limitations in maritime crisis response. Journal of Asian Security, 12(3), 156–176.
Streher, T. (2025). Middle power strategies and regional order in the Indo-Pacific. International Relations Quarterly, 42(1), 55–71.
TeleGeography. (2025). Submarine cable map and data systems report 2025. Washington, DC: TeleGeography Research. https://www.submarinecablemap.com
The Guardian. (2024, January 15). How undersea cables became the world’s information lifeline. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com
The Jakarta Post. (2023, August 8). Super Garuda Shield expands as Indonesia hosts multinational drills. https://www.thejakartapost.com
Vaarandi, J., Nguyen, H., & Lim, C. (2025). Mapping interdependent vulnerabilities of Indo-Pacific submarine infrastructure. Journal of Security Studies and Global Strategy, 7(2), 130–149.
Vishwanath, A. (2025, June 14). Protecting critical infrastructure in South Asia: Cyber threats and solutions. South Asian Voices. https://www.stimson.org/2025/protecting-critical-infrastructure-in-south-asia-cyber-threats-and-solutions/
Waluyo, R. (2024). India–Indonesia defense cooperation: Lessons from Samudra Shakti exercises. Defence and Diplomacy Review, 19(2), 75–92.
Wulolo, C. M., Legionosuko, T., Suhirwan, & Yusuf. (2019). Opportunities and optimization of the Our Eyes initiative as the strategy for counter-terrorism in ASEAN. International Journal of Law and Political Sciences, 13(1). World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. https://waset.org/Publication/10009914
Wisesa, R., Rachman, F., & Prakoso, H. (2024). Integrating maritime surveillance with civil infrastructure: Indonesia’s emerging defense model. Journal of Strategic Security, 17(1), 32–48.
Zulhatta, A. (2022). Maritime security in Southeast Asia: How has ASEAN been talking about it so far? Andalas Journal of International Studies, 11(2), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.25077/ajis.11.2.197-210.2022
Find the perfect home for your research! If this journal isn't the right fit, don't worry—we offer a wide range of journals covering diverse fields of study. Explore our other journals to discover the ideal platform for your work and maximize its impact. Browse now and take the next step in publishing your research:
| HOME | Yasin | AlSys | Anwarul | Masaliq | Arzusin | Tsaqofah | Ahkam | AlDyas | Mikailalsys | Edumalsys | Alsystech | AJSTEA | AJECEE | AJISD | IJHESS | IJEMT | IJECS | MJMS | MJAEI | AMJSAI | AJBMBR | AJSTM | AJCMPR | AJMSPHR | KIJST | KIJEIT | KIJAHRS |