Takaful in Market Reality: A Critical Assessment of Its Distinction from Conventional Insurance

Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

This paper critically examines the distinction between takaful and conventional insurance through the lens of maqasid al-Shari’ah. While existing scholarship has often compared the two systems primarily in terms of contractual structures and institutional arrangements, this study argues that contemporary takaful practices frequently replicate conventional insurance models, thereby raising concerns regarding their substantive alignment with Islamic principles. Methodologically, the paper adopts a qualitative doctrinal approach using content analysis of academic literature, fatwa positions, and regulatory guidelines. The analysis demonstrates that the fundamental distinction between takaful and conventional insurance lies not merely in structural modification, but in the ethical foundations of mutuality, justice, and risk-sharing that takaful is intended to uphold. The findings indicate that operational pressures and market realities have weakened these ideals, resulting in persistent challenges related to governance, surplus management, and product design. By incorporating maqasid considerations, particularly hifz al-māl and ʿadl, the study reorients the discourse on takaful from a narrow compliance-based perspective toward a more value-driven framework. The paper concludes that preserving the distinct identity of takaful requires moving beyond formal legal compliance to ensure that its operations genuinely reflect the higher objectives of Shari’ah. This study contributes theoretically by enriching the Islamic finance literature through a maqasid-centric perspective and offers practical implications for regulators, takaful operators, and policymakers seeking to realign industry practice with its original ethical foundations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Arianpour M. (2027)
    Assessment of Pragmatic Disorders in Persian­Speaking Adults with Acquired Brain Injury
    Language Related Research, 17(4), 35-70
  2. Mussin R.A. (2027)
    Redistribution of rock pressure and deformation of the rock mass in the Karaganda coal basin
    Kompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 341(2), 36-48
  3. Thu T.T.T. (2027)
    Management accounting effectiveness in tourism enterprises: The roles of technology readiness, information technology infrastructure, and data quality in an ai-driven business environment
    Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 9(1)

Article Details

How to Cite
Masruh, M. L. M., Yaakob, M. A., Darpen, M. H., & Sumardi, S. (2026). Takaful in Market Reality: A Critical Assessment of Its Distinction from Conventional Insurance. YASIN, 6(2), 1566-1585. https://doi.org/10.58578/yasin.v6i2.9369

References

Ahmed, H. (2016). Islamic financial services: An overview. Islamic Economic Studies, 24(1), 1–20.

Ali, K. (2021). Revisiting mutuality in takaful: Realities and challenges. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 12(3), 327–344.

Arshad, M. N. M., & Muda, R. (2019). Takaful awareness and penetration in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(1), 799–810.

Billah, M. M. (2019). Islamic insurance products: Exploring takaful principles, instruments and structures. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17681-5

Dusuki, A. W., & Abdullah, N. I. (2007). Maqasid al-Shari‘ah, maslahah, and corporate social responsibility. American Journal of Islam and Society, 24(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v24i1.415

Dusuki, A. W., & Bouheraoua, S. (2011). The framework of maqasid al-Shari’ah and its implication for Islamic finance. ICR Journal, 2(2), 316–336. https://doi.org/10.52282/icr.v2i2.651

Farooq, M. O., & El-Gamal, M. A. (2020). Takaful and Islamic financial ethics: Exploring the divergence. Review of Islamic Economics, 23(2), 149–172.

Hassan, M. K., Ismail, A. G., & Rahman, M. M. (2020). Takaful: An Islamic alternative model of insurance. Thunderbird International Business Review, 62(3), 265–278.

Htay, S. N. N., & Salman, S. A. (2013). Proposed best practices of financial reporting for Islamic insurance (Takaful) institutions in Malaysia. World Journal of Social Sciences, 3(5), 27–38.

Ismail, A. G., Latiff, R. A., & Ahmad, N. H. (2020). Hybrid takaful models: Legal and operational issues. Journal of Muamalat and Islamic Finance Research, 17(2), 44–58.

Jamil, N. N., & Marzuki, A. (2023). The effects of shariah governance on takaful performance of takaful operators in Malaysia. Journal of Islamic, Social, Economics and Development, 8(59), 468–474. https://oarep.usim.edu.my/entities/publication/5c510f3c-f960-4733-b713-c38d39b390b9/full

Kahf, M. (2015). Principles of Islamic economics applied to risk management: A critical outlook on takaful. Islamic Economic Studies, 23(2), 45–70.

Kamla, R., & Haque, F. (2019). Islamic accounting, neo-imperialism and identity staging: The Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 63, 102000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2017.06.001

Kassim, S. (2021). An appraisal of Shariah compliance in family takaful: A maqasid perspective. Islamic Economic Studies, 29(1), 91–108.

Kwon, W. J. (2007). Islamic principle and Takaful insurance: Re-evaluation of the argument. Journal of Insurance Regulation, 26(1), 53–81. https://naic.soutronglobal.net/Portal/Public/en-GB/RecordView/Index/4277

Laldin, M. A., & Furqani, H. (2013). Developing Islamic finance in the framework of maqasid al-Shari’ah: Understanding the ends (maqasid) and the means (wasa’il). International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 6(4), 278–289. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-05-2013-0057

Mahmoud, M. I. (2018). A critical review on the concept and practice of Takaful. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 13, 20–27.

Meera, A. K. M., & Larbani, M. (2009). Ownership effects of fractional reserve banking: An Islamic perspective. Humanomics, 25(2), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1108/08288660910964175

Mokhtar, S. M. (2018). Governance issues in takaful and the role of Shariah board. Al-Shajarah: Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 23(2), 197–215.

Obaidullah, M. (2021). The maqasid al-Shariah and the misalignment of Islamic finance practices. ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 13(1), 1–19.

Oseni, U. A., Hassan, M. K., & Matri, D. A. (2016). Dispute resolution in takaful: Legal and regulatory issues. Journal of Islamic Banking and Finance, 33(3), 21–34.

Redzuan, H., & Siti-Nabiha, A. K. (2012). The performance of takaful and conventional insurance in Malaysia. International Journal of Finance and Accounting, 1(2), 1–6.

Shafii, Z., & Salleh, S. (2010). Shariah compliance in Islamic finance: Trends and challenges. International Review of Business Research Papers, 6(2), 1–7.

Shamsuddin, M., Ibrahim, R., & Khalid, S. (2023). Financial inclusion through takaful: A maqasid-based approach. Journal of Islamic Financial Studies, 5(1), 15–29.

Siddiqi, M. N. (2006). Islamic insurance: Theory and practice. Islamic Development Bank Institute.

Smolo, E., & Hassan, M. K. (2011). The potentials of takaful markets. Islamic Finance Review, 1(1), 33–42.

Zainuddin, Y., & Yahya, Y. (2022). Ethical issues in takaful marketing: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Islamic Business and Ethics, 10(1), 22–39.