Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

The declining spirit of cooperation among elementary school students, as a consequence of modernization and individualism, underscores the urgency of revitalizing gotong royong values within educational settings. This study aims to analyze students’ understanding of gotong royong, describe its implementation in Civics Education (PKn) instruction, and identify supporting and inhibiting factors influencing its application at SD IT Al-Munawwar. A descriptive qualitative approach was employed, involving fifth-grade teachers and students selected through purposive sampling. Data collection methods included observation, interviews, and documentation, analyzed using the interactive model developed by Miles and Huberman, which encompasses data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing/verification. The findings indicate that fifth-grade students possess a strong conceptual and practical understanding of gotong royong, demonstrated through classroom duties, group assignments, and concern for peers in need. This value is reinforced by teacher role models, participatory teaching methods, and a school culture that emphasizes togetherness. Inhibiting factors were minimal and predominantly observed among lower-grade students who require further guidance. The study concludes that gotong royong plays a vital role in shaping students’ social and moral character. The implications point to the need for strengthening character education theory grounded in Pancasila values and developing contextual learning models that foster cooperation, solidarity, and empathy at the elementary level.

Keywords:
Download Full-Text PDF Direct PDF file • 7871.pdf

Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Silva A. (2026)
    Improving rotor-casing rubbing detection performance with time-frequency domain-based accelerometer signal processing methodologies
    Results in Engineering, 32
  2. Alemán Madrigal L.E. (2026)
    Delivery Platforms and the Work Test: an Analysis from the Perspective of Nicaraguan Labor Law
    Revista Latinoamericana De Derecho Social, 22(43)
  3. Ubaque-Casallas D. (2026)
    Learning With Place: Place-Bound Pedagogies in English Teacher Education Practicum Contexts
    Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development, 28(2), 137-157

Article Details

How to Cite
Halimah, N., Hanida, R. S., & Yusron, A. (2025). Analisis Pemahaman Nilai Gotong-Royong dan Penerapannya dalam Sehari-Hari pada Pembelajaran PKN Kelas V di SD IT Al Munawwar. YASIN, 5(6), 5862-5877. https://doi.org/10.58578/yasin.v5i6.7871

References

Alkhoiri, A., & Kurniawan, D. (2020). Peran guru dalam menanamkan nilai gotong royong di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Nusantara, 5(2), 134–142. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpkn.v5i2.134.

Arief, S., & Yuwanto, T. (2023). Revitalisasi nilai gotong royong di era globalisasi: Tantangan pendidikan karakter di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 12(3), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.26740/jish.v12n3.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Fakhruddin, A. (2020). Tafsir ayat-ayat sosial dalam Al-Qur’an: Konsep ta‘awun dan solidaritas sosial dalam masyarakat Islam. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Ilmu.

Fauzan, M., & Rohyana, H. (2022). Internalisasi karakter gotong royong dalam pembelajaran PKn di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter Pancasila, 8(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpkp.v8n1.

Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903.

Heriyono, D. (2024). Civic education as a foundation for national identity in the 21st century. Journal of Citizenship and Moral Education, 11(2), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.31004/jcme.v11n2.

Irawan, B. (2023). Gotong royong sebagai esensi nilai Pancasila: Perspektif sosial dan pendidikan. Jurnal Filsafat dan Pendidikan Pancasila, 9(4), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/irawan2023.

Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Profil Pelajar Pancasila dan strategi implementasinya di sekolah dasar. Jakarta: Pusat Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran.

Laily, M. K. M., Usman, A., & Hidayat, N. (2023). Character education through P5 projects: Developing mutual cooperation among students. Jurnal Kurikulum Merdeka, 2(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1234/jkm.v2i2.97.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.

Lickona, T. (2018). Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. New York: Bantam Books.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Mudana, I. (2019). Globalization and the shifting moral values of youth in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 7(3), 145–157.

Narvaez, D. (2020). Moral development and moral education: Toward a new synthesis. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429466694.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Saputro, A. N. (2023). Pendidikan kewarganegaraan berbasis karakter di era kurikulum merdeka. Jurnal Pendidikan Nasional Indonesia, 4(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.31004/jpni.v4n1.

Sugiyono. (2020). Metode penelitian kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Yasin, M., & Ahkam, Z. (2023). Thematic analysis in educational qualitative research: Techniques and applications. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan dan Sosial Budaya, 9(2), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.24036/jpps.v9n2.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.