Application of the Survey Question Read Recite and Review (SQ3R) Method to Students' Reading Comprehension Skills
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
1320-1330
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/yasin.v5i2.5213
Viewed: 554 times
Downloaded: 177 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Lale Aprihatin Diana Safitri1* 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study discusses how to improve students' reading skills through the Survey Question Read Recite and Review (SQ3R) method. The purpose of this study is to improve the reading skills of grade VII students, this is due to the lack of students' ability to understand the texts they read. The data source in this study was grade VII students of SMP ISLAM TERAMPIL NM NW APANCOR KOPONG with a total of 23 students. This study was conducted in two cycles and the data collected were quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative data is data obtained from the results of formative tests in each cycle, while qualitative data is in the form of observation results in each learning cycle. Based on the results of the study, the application of the SQ3R method can improve students' reading comprehension skills. This can be seen from the results of the students' reading comprehension test before the action was taken which only achieved classical completeness of 42.30% or could be said to be lacking. After applying the method in cycle I, students' reading comprehension skills increased with classical completeness of 69.23%, this can be said to be sufficient. In cycle II, students' reading comprehension ability increased quite significantly, namely with classical completeness of 88.46%, which is considered perfect. Thus, it can be concluded that the application of the Survey, Question, Read, Recite and Review (SQ3R) method can improve the reading comprehension ability of grade VII students.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Alneyadi, S., Abulibdeh, E., & Wardat, Y. (2023). The Impact of Digital Environment vs. Traditional Method on Literacy Skills; Reading and Writing of Emirati Fourth Graders. Sustainability, 15(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043418
Asad, M. M., Naz, A., Churi, P., & Tahanzadeh, M. M. (2021). Virtual Reality as Pedagogical Tool to Enhance Experiential Learning: A Systematic Literature Review. Education Research International, 2021(1), 7061623. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7061623
Bağrıacık Yılmaz, A., & Karataş, S. (2022). Why do open and distance education students drop out? Views from various stakeholders. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00333-x
Bayram, İ., & Bıkmaz, F. (2021). Implications of Lesson Study for Tertiary-Level EFL Teachers’ Professional Development: A Case Study From Turkey. SAGE Open, 11(2), 21582440211023771. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211023771
Castells, N., Minguela, M., Solé, I., Miras, M., Nadal, E., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2022). Improving Questioning–Answering Strategies in Learning from Multiple Complementary Texts: An Intervention Study. Reading Research Quarterly, 57(3), 879–912. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.451
Ghani, A. S. A., Rahim, A. F. A., Yusoff, M. S. B., & Hadie, S. N. H. (2021). Effective Learning Behavior in Problem-Based Learning: A Scoping Review. Medical Science Educator, 31(3), 1199–1211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01292-0
Hartanto, S., Permana, S. A., & Pringgowijoyo, Y. (2021). Mind Mapping Based Mobile Learning System to Increase Student Creativity. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1823(1), 012013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1823/1/012013
Hastasari, C., Setiawan, B., & Aw, S. (2022). Students’ communication patterns of islamic boarding schools: The case of Students in Muallimin Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta. Heliyon, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08824
Hennessy, S., Kershner, R., Calcagni, E., & Ahmed, F. (2021). Supporting practitioner-led inquiry into classroom dialogue with a research-informed professional learning resource: A design-based approach. Review of Education, 9(3), e3269. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3269
Krawitz, J., Chang, Y.-P., Yang, K.-L., & Schukajlow, S. (2022). The role of reading comprehension in mathematical modelling: Improving the construction of a real-world model and interest in Germany and Taiwan. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 109(2), 337–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10058-9
Kurnia, A. B., Lowrie, T., & Patahuddin, S. M. (2024). The development of high school students’ statistical literacy across grade level. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 36(1), 7–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-023-00449-x
Li, W., Gillies, R., He, M., Wu, C., Liu, S., Gong, Z., & Sun, H. (2021). Barriers and facilitators to online medical and nursing education during the COVID-19 pandemic: Perspectives from international students from low- and middle-income countries and their teaching staff. Human Resources for Health, 19(1), 64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-021-00609-9
Muthmainnah, Ibna Seraj, P. M., & Oteir, I. (2022). Playing with AI to Investigate Human-Computer Interaction Technology and Improving Critical Thinking Skills to Pursue 21st Century Age. Education Research International, 2022(1), 6468995. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6468995
Rasyid, F., Ibna Seraj, P. M., Ghofur, Abd., & Asrifan, A. (2023). Students’ Perception toward Teaching Strategies of Native and Nonnative English-Speaking Teachers: A Case Study in Indonesia. Education Research International, 2023(1), 7827917. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7827917
Relyea, J. E., Rich, P., Kim, J. S., & Gilbert, J. B. (2023). The COVID-19 impact on reading achievement growth of Grade 3–5 students in a U.S. urban school district: Variation across student characteristics and instructional modalities. Reading and Writing, 36(2), 317–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10387-y
Selwyn, N., Hillman, T., Bergviken Rensfeldt, A., & Perrotta, C. (2023). Digital Technologies and the Automation of Education—Key Questions and Concerns. Postdigital Science and Education, 5(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00263-3
Shu, X., & Gu, X. (2023). An Empirical Study of A Smart Education Model Enabled by the Edu-Metaverse to Enhance Better Learning Outcomes for Students. Systems, 11(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11020075
Teng, M. F., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Development of children’s metacognitive knowledge, reading, and writing in English as a foreign language: Evidence from longitudinal data using multilevel models. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), e12413. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12413
Trew, B. T., & Maclean, I. M. D. (2021). Vulnerability of global biodiversity hotspots to climate change. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 30(4), 768–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13272
Watson, C., Templet, T., Leigh, G., Broussard, L., & Gillis, L. (2023). Student and faculty perceptions of effectiveness of online teaching modalities. Nurse Education Today, 120, 105651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105651
Yapp, D., de Graaff, R., & van den Bergh, H. (2023). Effects of reading strategy instruction in English as a second language on students’ academic reading comprehension. Language Teaching Research, 27(6), 1456–1479. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820985236