Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Course Review Horay (CRH) terhadap Hasil Belajar PAI Siswa di SMPN 1 Tigo Nagari Kabupaten Pasaman The Effect of the Course Review Horay (CRH) Learning Model on Students’ PAI Learning Outcomes at SMPN 1 Tigo Nagari Pasaman Regency
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
4026-4043
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/yasin.v6i4.10764
Viewed: 0 times
Downloaded: 0 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Inel Inel1*, Deswalantri Deswalantri2 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Low student learning outcomes in Islamic Religious Education and Character Education (PAI BP) remain a concern in various educational studies. Nevertheless, studies that specifically analyze the effect of the Course Review Horay learning model on students’ learning outcomes in the topic of the Role of Muslim Scientists during the Umayyad Dynasty at the junior high school level remain limited. This study aims to analyze the effect of the Course Review Horay learning model on the learning outcomes of seventh-grade students in the PAI BP subject at SMPN 1 Tigo Nagari, Pasaman Regency. This study used a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental design of the nonequivalent control group design type. The research sample consisted of 60 students selected through purposive sampling, comprising 30 students in the experimental class and 30 students in the control class. Data were collected through learning outcome tests in the form of a pretest and posttest, and were then analyzed using descriptive statistics and a t-test with the assistance of SPSS version 20. The results showed that the mean score of the experimental class increased from 49.90 to 77.47, whereas the mean score of the control class increased from 45.57 to 57.97. The hypothesis test results showed a calculated t-value of 49.533 with a significance value of 0.000 (<0.05), indicating that the Course Review Horay learning model had a significant effect on students’ learning outcomes. These findings strengthen the relevance of cooperative learning and social constructivism, which emphasize students’ active engagement in the learning process. The conclusion of this study confirms that the Course Review Horay model can serve as an alternative innovative learning strategy for PAI BP teachers in improving students’ learning outcomes. The implications of this study encourage the use of more active, participatory, and enjoyable learning models in PAI BP learning, while also opening opportunities for further research with broader samples and coverage of students’ affective and psychomotor aspects.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Andini, S. R., Firman, F., & Desyandri, D. (2021). Analisis Model Pembelajaran Course Review Horay (CRH) sebagai Model Inovatif yang Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Tematik Siswa SD. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 5(3), 10078–10084. https://jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/2577
Andini, S. R., & Miaz, Y. (2022). The effect of the Course Review Horay learning model on students’ motivation and learning outcomes. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 11(4), 585–592. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v11i4.54423
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Ghasemi, A., & Zahediasl, S. (2012). Normality tests for statistical analysis: A guide for non-statisticians. International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 10(2), 486–489. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.3505
Hardani, Auliya, N. H., Andriani, H., Fardani, R. A., Ustiawaty, J., Utami, E. F., Sukmana, D. J., & Istiqomah, R. R. (2020). Metode penelitian kualitatif & kuantitatif. Pustaka Ilmu.
Huda, M. (2014). Model-model Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran: Isu-Isu Metodis dan Paradigmatis. Pustaka Pelajar.
Ishak, I., & Sulaiman, S. (2022). Hasil Belajar PAI Melalui Metode Kooperatif Tipe Course Review Horay. Al-Irsyad: Journal of Education Science, 1(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.58917/aijes.v1i1.3
Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2020). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (7th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Kim, H. Y. (2013). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 38(1), 52–54. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.52
OECD. (2023). Education at a glance 2023: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/e13bef63-en
Purwanti, E. (2020). Peningkatan Prestasi Belajar Pendidikan Agama Islam (PAI) dengan Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Aktif Course Review Horay (CRH). Jurnal Pendidikan, 28(3), 247–254. https://doi.org/10.32585/jp.v28i3.485
Rahayuliah. (2020). Upaya Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik dengan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Course Review Horay pada Mata Pelajaran PAI Kelas VIII di SMP Tunas Insani. Inspiratif Pendidikan, 9(1), 248–268. https://doi.org/10.24252/ip.v9i1.15985
Schunk, D. H. (2020). Learning theories: An educational perspective (8th ed.). Pearson.
Slavin, R. E. (2020). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (13th ed.). Pearson.
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Taherdoost, H. (2016). Validity and reliability of the research instrument: How to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 5(3), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205040