Konsep Ketuhanan dalam Agama-Agama dan Implikasinya terhadap Pandangan Dunia Islam The Concept of God in Religions and Its Implications for the Islamic Worldview

Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

This study analyzes the concept of divinity across various religious traditions and its implications for shaping the Islamic worldview. It aims to critically examine how the concept of tauhid in Islam is constructed through theological dialogue with concepts of God in other religions, and to explain its epistemological, ontological, axiological, and practical consequences for the Islamic worldview. The research employs a comparative theology approach by analyzing primary sources (the Al-Qur’an, Hadis, and the Alkitab) alongside relevant secondary literature from classical and contemporary scholars. The findings indicate that the Islamic concept of divinity, which is centered on tauhid and the declaration lā ilāha illā Allāh, is not merely a theological statement but a paradigm that structures every aspect of Muslim life, including ways of understanding reality, values, and human action. Compared with concepts of divinity in Judaism, Christianity, and Zoroastrianism, fundamental differences lie in the understanding of divine simplicity, the configuration of God’s attributes, and the relationship between divine transcendence and immanence. The implications of the Islamic concept of divinity for the worldview include: (1) affirmation of Allah’s absolute sovereignty in the creation and governance of the universe, (2) a distinct understanding of human will and destiny (qadar), (3) reinforcement of the principle of divine justice and human moral responsibility, and (4) the formulation of human life’s purpose as servants who worship sincerely. This study contributes to deepening Islamic theology and reaffirms the relevance of the Islamic concept of divinity for shaping a meaningful worldview in the context of modern life.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Fadzli A.I.M. (2026)
    THE CONSTITUTION OF MEDINA AND THE ORIGINS OF CITIZENSHIP CONCEPT: A CONTEMPORARY REAPPRAISAL
    Iium Law Journal, 34(1), 559-604
  2. Ran A. (2026)
    Feminist Body Horror and Abjection in Black Christmas (2019)
    Gema Online Journal of Language Studies, 26(2), 470-481
  3. Lailam T. (2026)
    Kelsen vs Schmitt on Guardians of the Constitution Debates and the Impact on the Indonesian Legal System
    Jurnal Konstitusi, 23(1)

Article Details

How to Cite
Marini, M. I., Istikotimah, I., Jauhara, R., & Sumiran, S. (2025). Konsep Ketuhanan dalam Agama-Agama dan Implikasinya terhadap Pandangan Dunia Islam. TSAQOFAH, 6(2), 1760-1770. https://doi.org/10.58578/tsaqofah.v6i2.8629

References

Al-Asy‘ari, A. H. (1950). Maqālāt al-Islāmiyyīn wa ikhtilāf al-muṣallīn. Maktabat al-Maḥmūdiyyah.
Al-Asy‘ari, A. H. (2001). The elucidation of Islam’s foundation (Kitāb al-Ibānah ‘an uṣūl al-diyānah) (W. McCarthy, Trans.). Yale University Press.
Al-Ghazālī, A. H. M. (1987). Iḥyā’ ‘ulūm al-dīn (Vols. 3–4). Dār al-Qalam.
Al-Ghazālī, A. H. M. (2001). Deliverance from error (Al-Munqidh min al-ḍalāl) (R. J. McCarthy, Trans.). Fons Vitae.
Al-Khaṭīb, A. H. (2003). Uṣūl al-fikr al-siyāsī al-islāmī: Al-qaḍiyyah wa-al-mabādi’ al-asāsiyyah. Maktabat al-Madbūlī.
Al-Māturīdī, A. M. (2004). Kitāb al-tawḥīd. Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Al-Qāḍī ‘Abd al-Jabbār. (1996). Sharḥ al-uṣūl al-khamsah. Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-‘Arabī.
Al-Ṭabarī, M. I. (2000). Tafsīr al-Ṭabarī (Vol. 1). Dār al-Ḥadīth.
Anselm of Canterbury. (1977). Monologion (T. Williams, Trans.). Hackett Publishing.
Augustine of Hippo. (1995). On the Trinity (E. Hill, Trans.). New City Press.
Boyce, M. (1984). Zoroastrianism: Their religious beliefs and practices. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Calvin, J. (1960). Institutes of the Christian religion (J. T. McNeill, Ed.; F. L. Battles, Trans.). Westminster Press.
Council of Nicaea. (325). Nicene Creed. In J. Stevenson (Ed.), Creeds, councils and controversies (pp. 12–25). SPCK.
Esposito, J. L. (2005). Islam: The straight path (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Hick, J. (1983). Philosophy of religion (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.
Ibn Sīnā. (1948). Al-shifā’: Al-ilāhiyyāt. Al-Qāhirah.
Koltko-Rivera, M. E. (2004). The psychology of worldviews. Review of General Psychology, 8(1), 3–58. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.8.1.3
Mawdūdī, A. A. (1991). Political theory of Islam. Islamic Publications Ltd.
Nasr, S. H. (2006). Islam and the plight of modern man. ABC International Group.
Pew Research Center. (2015). The future of world religions: Population growth projections, 2010–2050. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2015/04/02/religious-projections-2010-2050/
Shari‘ati, A. (2009). Mencari Ideologi. Mizan.
Shihab, M. Q. (2000). Tafsir al-Mishbah: Pesan, Kesan dan Keserasian Al-Qur’an (Vol. 15). Lentera Hati.
Syahrūr, M. (1990). Al-kitāb wa-al-Qur’ān: Qirā’ah mu‘āṣirah. Al-Ahālī.
The Holy Qur’an. (n.d.). Surahs: Al-Anbiyā’ (21:25), Yūnus (10:47), Al-Ra‘d (13:38), Al-Ikhlāṣ (112:1–4), Asy-Shūrā (42:11), At-Tawbah (9:30–31), Al-Mā’idah (5:72), Fāṭir (35:15), Al-An‘ām (6:32; 6:96–97), Al-Furqān (25:2), Al-Baqarah (2:228; 2:34), Adh-Dhāriyāt (51:56), Al-Isrā’ (17:70).

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>