Analisis Tipe Kepribadian dan Minat Karir Mahasiswa Berdasarkan Teori Holland (RIASEC) Analysis of Student Personality Types and Career Interests Based on Holland’s Theory (RIASEC)
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
6829-6845
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/tsaqofah.v5i6.7950
Viewed: 750 times
Downloaded: 274 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:Noris Dwi Saputra1, Vera Irma Delianti2, Rizkayeni Marta3, Delvi Asmara4
Copyright :Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Career selection is a strategic process for university students in determining a future path aligned with their potential, interests, and personality traits. Students of the Informatics Engineering Education Program at Universitas Negeri Padang face diverse career opportunities, necessitating accurate mapping of personality types and career interests to support more targeted career decision-making. This study aims to examine the construct validity and reliability of students' personality types and career interests based on Holland’s RIASEC theory, which classifies individuals into six personality types correlated with specific career tendencies. A quantitative approach was employed using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). The sample consisted of 51 active students from the 2021 cohort, selected using Slovin’s formula from a total population of 104. The research instrument was a closed-ended questionnaire adapted from the Self-Directed Search (SDS), utilizing a 5-point Likert scale and analyzed with SmartPLS 4 software. The analysis showed that all indicators had outer loading values > 0.70 and Average Variance Extracted (AVE) > 0.50. Additionally, Cronbach’s Alpha and Composite Reliability values exceeded 0.90, indicating excellent instrument reliability. The Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) values were 0.074 for the personality model and 0.071 for the career interest model, demonstrating acceptable model fit. These findings confirm that the personality and career interest models based on Holland’s theory are valid and reliable, and may serve as a foundation for the development of structured, data-driven assessment instruments and career guidance services.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles
-
Irawati R. (2027)Enhancing accounting students’ writing performance through problem-based learning: Evidence from a vocational higher education contextMultidisciplinary Science Journal, 9(1)
-
Petrukha N. (2027)Innovative and Digital Approaches in Higher Education for Student Motivation and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A Literature ReviewAsean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(1), 171-182
-
Buasen J.A. (2027)Institutional underspending in a state university: Managerial constraints and implications for organizational developmentMultidisciplinary Science Journal, 9(1)
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Ersoy, H., & Ülgen, M. (2023). Professions and competencies of computer education and instructional technologies department's graduates in non-teaching fields. ERIC.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Psychological Assessment Resources.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Nauta, M. M. (2020). Person–environment congruence and career satisfaction: A meta-analytic review of Holland’s theory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 122, 103477.
Panlaqui, C. C. (2023). Pondering the phenomenon of choosing non-teaching jobs among teacher education graduates. ResearchGate.
Putri, M. P. (2017). Career counseling by using self-control technique to assist student career decision-making. In I. Ifdil & N. Krishnawati (Eds.), 1st ASEAN School Counselor Conference on Innovation and Creativity in Counseling (pp. 87–92). IBKS Publishing.
Rounds, J., & Su, R. (2021). The nature and power of interests. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(2), 128–134.
Savickas, M. L. (2013). Career construction theory and practice. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Career development and counseling (2nd ed., pp. 147–183). Wiley.
Super, D. E. (1990). A life-span, life-space approach to career development. In D. Brown & L. Brooks (Eds.), Career choice and development (2nd ed., pp. 197–261). Jossey-Bass.
Wille, B., & De Fruyt, F. (2014). Vocational interests and personality traits across adulthood: Development and associations with work outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(3), 290–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.07.002