Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Pendekatan Deplearning Implementation of the Merdeka Belajar Curriculum with a Deep Learning Approach
Main Article Content
Abstract
Although the Merdeka Belajar Curriculum has been directed toward promoting independence, meaningful engagement, and contextual learning experiences, its implementation still requires a learning approach that can strengthen conceptual understanding, critical thinking, collaboration, creativity, and the application of knowledge in authentic contexts. This study aims to analyze the implementation of the Merdeka Belajar Curriculum through a deep learning approach, identify supporting and inhibiting factors, and examine its implications for improving learning quality. This study used a qualitative approach with a case study design. Data were collected through classroom observations, semi-structured interviews with the principal, teachers, and students, as well as documentation analysis of teaching modules, learning activities, and assessment instruments. The data were analyzed through data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing using an interactive analysis model. The results showed that the deep learning approach supported the implementation of the Merdeka Belajar Curriculum through student-centered learning, inquiry-based activities, collaborative problem solving, differentiated learning, and authentic assessment. Teachers play an important role in designing learning experiences that connect academic material with real-life situations and students’ needs. The main challenges in implementing this approach include differences in teachers’ pedagogical competence, limited learning resources, limited time, and uneven student readiness. The conclusion of this study affirms that the deep learning approach strengthens the orientation of the Merdeka Belajar Curriculum toward holistic student development, particularly in cognitive, social, emotional, and character dimensions. The implications of this study include the importance of continuous teacher professional development, institutional support, the provision of adaptive learning resources, and an evaluation system capable of measuring higher-order thinking skills and meaningful learning outcomes.

Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Article Details

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Angga, A., Suryana, C., Nurwahidah, I., Hernawan, A. H., & Prihantini, P. (2022). Komparasi Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 dan Kurikulum Merdeka di Sekolah Dasar Kabupaten Garut. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4), 5877–5889. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3149
Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Fullan, M., Quinn, J., & McEachen, J. (2018). Deep learning: Engage the world change the world. Corwin.
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. (2022a). Keputusan Kepala Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan Nomor 033/H/KR/2022 tentang Capaian Pembelajaran pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah pada Kurikulum Merdeka.
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. (2022b). Panduan Pembelajaran dan Asesmen Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Pendidikan Dasar, dan Pendidikan Menengah.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I—Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x
Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 226–232. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15430421TIP4104_4
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia. (2022). Curriculum framework for the implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
Rahayu, R., Rosita, R., Rahayuningsih, Y. S., Hernawan, A. H., & Prihantini, P. (2022). Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar di Sekolah Penggerak. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4), 6313–6319. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3237
Sahlberg, P. (2021). Finnish lessons 3.0: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? Teachers College Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (Expanded 2nd ed.). ASCD.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.














