Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Pendekatan Deplearning Implementation of the Merdeka Belajar Curriculum with a Deep Learning Approach

Main Article Content

Hartadi Hartadi
Taufiqurrohman Taufiqurrohman

Abstract

Although the Merdeka Belajar Curriculum has been directed toward promoting independence, meaningful engagement, and contextual learning experiences, its implementation still requires a learning approach that can strengthen conceptual understanding, critical thinking, collaboration, creativity, and the application of knowledge in authentic contexts. This study aims to analyze the implementation of the Merdeka Belajar Curriculum through a deep learning approach, identify supporting and inhibiting factors, and examine its implications for improving learning quality. This study used a qualitative approach with a case study design. Data were collected through classroom observations, semi-structured interviews with the principal, teachers, and students, as well as documentation analysis of teaching modules, learning activities, and assessment instruments. The data were analyzed through data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing using an interactive analysis model. The results showed that the deep learning approach supported the implementation of the Merdeka Belajar Curriculum through student-centered learning, inquiry-based activities, collaborative problem solving, differentiated learning, and authentic assessment. Teachers play an important role in designing learning experiences that connect academic material with real-life situations and students’ needs. The main challenges in implementing this approach include differences in teachers’ pedagogical competence, limited learning resources, limited time, and uneven student readiness. The conclusion of this study affirms that the deep learning approach strengthens the orientation of the Merdeka Belajar Curriculum toward holistic student development, particularly in cognitive, social, emotional, and character dimensions. The implications of this study include the importance of continuous teacher professional development, institutional support, the provision of adaptive learning resources, and an evaluation system capable of measuring higher-order thinking skills and meaningful learning outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Scopus Citation Data

Citation data unavailable
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Angraini L.M. (2027)
    Integrating Computational Thinking and Islamic Values in Geometry Learning: Effects on Pre-Service Primary Teachers’ Conceptual Understanding
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(1), 67-78
  2. Chano J. (2027)
    Lesson Study and School as a Learning Community to Support Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Definition, Literature Review, and Bibliometric Mapping
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(1), 153-170
  3. Bursan I.Z. (2027)
    The Integration of Islamic Religious Values in the Ritual Mantras of Pinisi Boat-Making as Instructional Material for Literature Learning in Islamic Schools
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(1), 1-14

Article Details

How to Cite
Hartadi, H., & Taufiqurrohman, T. (2026). Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Pendekatan Deplearning. TSAQOFAH, 6(4), 4150-4168. https://doi.org/10.58578/tsaqofah.v6i4.11043

References

Angga, A., Suryana, C., Nurwahidah, I., Hernawan, A. H., & Prihantini, P. (2022). Komparasi Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 dan Kurikulum Merdeka di Sekolah Dasar Kabupaten Garut. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4), 5877–5889. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3149

Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Fullan, M., Quinn, J., & McEachen, J. (2018). Deep learning: Engage the world change the world. Corwin.

Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. (2022a). Keputusan Kepala Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan Nomor 033/H/KR/2022 tentang Capaian Pembelajaran pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah pada Kurikulum Merdeka.

Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. (2022b). Panduan Pembelajaran dan Asesmen Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Pendidikan Dasar, dan Pendidikan Menengah.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I—Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x

Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 226–232. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15430421TIP4104_4

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia. (2022). Curriculum framework for the implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x

Rahayu, R., Rosita, R., Rahayuningsih, Y. S., Hernawan, A. H., & Prihantini, P. (2022). Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar di Sekolah Penggerak. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4), 6313–6319. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3237

Sahlberg, P. (2021). Finnish lessons 3.0: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? Teachers College Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (Expanded 2nd ed.). ASCD.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.


Explore Our Journals
Find the most suitable journal for your research. If this journal does not fully align with the scope of your manuscript, we invite you to explore our wider portfolio of journals covering diverse fields of study. Please select one of the journals below to identify the most appropriate publication platform for your work.