Main Article Content


Abstract

The field of educational administration has undergone significant transformation in response to shifts in educational paradigms, advances in digital technology, the demands of globalization, and the growing need for effective, efficient, transparent, and accountable governance of educational institutions. Although educational administration has been widely discussed, studies integrating its theoretical development, implementation, and challenges within the context of educational governance in the digital era still require further strengthening. This article aims to examine the transformation of educational administration theories, their implementation in the management of educational institutions, and the various challenges involved in achieving high-quality educational governance. The study employed a library research method with a qualitative descriptive approach through an analysis of books, national and international journal articles, and relevant educational policy documents. The findings indicate that educational administration theories have developed from classical approaches oriented toward organizational efficiency to modern approaches emphasizing transformational leadership, school-based management, collaboration, innovation, digitalization, and data-driven decision-making. The implementation of educational administration in the digital era provides opportunities to improve the quality of educational services through the use of information technology, but it continues to face constraints, including limited human resource competencies, resistance to change, inadequate facilities and infrastructure, the digital divide, and a weak organizational culture. This study concludes that the transformation of educational administration requires strengthening leadership capacity, improving the competencies of educators and education personnel, digitalizing administrative systems, developing a quality culture, and fostering collaboration among stakeholders. These findings contribute to the development of educational administration studies and provide practical implications for educational institutions in establishing effective, adaptive, accountable, and sustainable governance.

Keywords:
Download Full-Text PDF Direct PDF file • 11282.pdf

Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Ding S. (2027)
    Digital Renewal of University Education: Barriers, Opportunities, and Contributions to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(2), 229-240
  2. Trisnowati E. (2027)
    Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) and Research Skill Development (RSD) in Science Education in Higher Education: A Delphi-Based Model
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(2), 253-268
  3. Unyaphatariyakool S. (2027)
    Science Teachers’ Learning Management Competency through Professional Learning Communities to Promote Scientific Creativity and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(2), 241-252

Article Details

How to Cite
Nuruddin, & Fatimah, M. (2026). Transformasi Teori Administrasi Pendidikan: Konsep, Implementasi, dan Tantangan dalam Mewujudkan Tata Kelola Pendidikan yang Efektif. TSAQOFAH, 6(4), 4337-4346. https://doi.org/10.58578/tsaqofah.v6i4.11282

References

Bush, T. (2020). Theories of educational leadership and management (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://www.sagepub.com/shop/buy-a-book/theories-of-educational-leadership-and-management-5-258644

Daft, R. L. (2022). Management (14th ed.). Cengage Learning. https://www.cengage.com/c/management-14e-daft/9780357139752/

Fayol, H. (1949). General and industrial management (C. Storrs, Trans.). Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons.

Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2013). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (9th ed.). McGraw Hill. https://www.mheducation.com/highered/product/educational-administration-theory-research-and-practice-hoy.html

Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2022a). Kurikulum Merdeka.

Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2022b). Panduan Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Internal (SPMI).

Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2021). Management (15th ed.). Pearson. https://www.pearson.com/nl/en_NL/higher-education/subject-catalogue/business-and-management/Management-15e-Robbins-Coulter.html

Sallis, E. (2002). Total quality management in education (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Total-Quality-Management-in-Education/Sallis/p/book/9780749437961

Sergiovanni, T. J., & Green, R. L. (2014). The principalship: A reflective practice perspective (7th ed.). Pearson. https://www.pearson.com/en-ca/subject-catalog/p/principalship-the-a-reflective-practice-perspective/P200000001816/9780133261714

Siagian, S. P. (2019). Filsafat Administrasi. Bumi Aksara.

Sugiyono. (2023). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Alfabeta.

Terry, G. R. (1968). Principles of management (5th ed.). R. D. Irwin.

Usman, H. (2020). Manajemen: Teori, Praktik, dan Riset Pendidikan (Edisi ke-5). Bumi Aksara.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>