Transformasi Tes Diagnostik dalam Pendidikan: Konsep, Pengembangan, dan Implementasinya untuk Mewujudkan Pembelajaran Adaptif Transformation of Diagnostic Testing in Education: Concepts, Development, and Its Implementation to Realize Adaptive Learning
Main Article Content
Abstract
Diagnostic tests are a form of assessment that serves to identify students’ initial abilities, misconceptions, learning difficulties, and needs before and during the learning process. The shift in the twenty-first-century educational paradigm toward differentiated and adaptive learning has further strengthened the strategic role of diagnostic tests in supporting effective, meaningful, and student-centered learning. This article aims to examine the concepts, characteristics, development principles, preparation stages, implementation, and challenges and opportunities associated with applying diagnostic tests in adaptive learning in the digital era. The study employed a library research method with a qualitative descriptive approach through an analysis of books, national and international journal articles, and relevant educational policy documents. The findings indicate that diagnostic tests function not only as tools for measuring initial abilities but have also developed into instruments for data-driven instructional decision-making. The integration of digital technology enables diagnostic tests to be administered automatically, adaptively, rapidly, and accurately, allowing teachers to design learning strategies suited to students’ characteristics and needs. The implementation of diagnostic tests also supports the application of the Kurikulum Merdeka through differentiated learning, formative assessment, and improvements in the quality of student-centered educational services. This study concludes that the effectiveness of diagnostic tests in adaptive learning largely depends on teachers’ competence in designing instruments, interpreting assessment results, and using them as a basis for developing learning strategies. These findings strengthen the literature on educational assessment and emphasize the importance of developing teachers’ competencies and utilizing digital technology to achieve high-quality adaptive learning.

Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles
-
Ding S. (2027)Digital Renewal of University Education: Barriers, Opportunities, and Contributions to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(2), 229-240
-
Raime S. (2027)Mental Health and Neurodivergence Disclosure Risk Mitigation in Private Higher Education Institutions: An Integrated Risk-Protection Framework to Support Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(1), 183-200
-
Irawati R. (2027)Enhancing accounting students’ writing performance through problem-based learning: Evidence from a vocational higher education contextMultidisciplinary Science Journal, 9(1)
Article Details

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Brookhart, S. M. (2017). How to give effective feedback to your students (2nd ed.). ASCD. https://www.ascd.org/books/how-to-give-effective-feedback-to-your-students-2nd-edition
Brown, H. D., & Abeywickrama, P. (2019). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices (3rd ed.). Pearson. https://www.longmanhomeusa.com/catalog/products/language-assessment-principles-and-classroom-practices/
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. https://www.mheducation.com/highered/product/how-to-design-and-evaluate-research-in-education-fraenkel.html
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203181522
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2021). Panduan Pembelajaran dan Asesmen Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah (SD/MI, SMP/MTs, SMA/SMK/MA). https://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/24921/
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2022a). Capaian Pembelajaran pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan Pendidikan Menengah pada Kurikulum Merdeka.
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2022b). Panduan Asesmen Diagnosis Kognitif dan Nonkognitif.
Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Republik Indonesia. (2024). Panduan Pembelajaran dan Asesmen. https://bgtkkalteng.kemendikdasmen.go.id/peraturan-juknis/panduan-pembelajaran-dan-asesmen-tahun-2024
Miller, M. D., Linn, R. L., & Gronlund, N. E. (2009). Measurement and assessment in teaching (10th ed.). Pearson.
Brookhart, S. M., & Nitko, A. J. (2018). Educational assessment of students (8th ed.). Pearson. https://www.pearson.com/en-au/subject-catalog/p/educational-assessment-of-students/P200000000835/9780134807072
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Pellegrino, J. W. (2014). Assessment as a positive influence on 21st century teaching and learning: A systems approach to progress. Psicología Educativa, 20(2), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pse.2014.11.002
Popham, W. J. (2018). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know (8th ed.). Pearson.
Prasetyo, Z. K., & Widodo, A. (2021). Asesmen Diagnostik sebagai Dasar Implementasi Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 10(3), 512–523.
Purwanto, N. (2017). Prinsip-Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian. Parama Publishing.
Retnawati, H. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Asesmen Pendidikan pada Era Digital. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 25(2), 123–138.
Stiggins, R. J. (2005). From formative assessment to assessment for learning: A path to success in standards-based schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(4), 324–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170508700414
Sugiyono. (2023). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sukardi. (2021). Evaluasi Pendidikan: Prinsip dan Operasionalnya. Bumi Aksara.
Suwarto. (2018). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Pustaka Pelajar.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms (3rd ed.). ASCD. https://www.ascd.org/books/how-to-differentiate-instruction-in-academically-diverse-classrooms-3rd-edition
Uno, H. B., & Koni, S. (2020). Assessment Pembelajaran. Bumi Aksara.
Widoyoko, E. P. (2018). Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Penelitian. Pustaka Pelajar.
Wiliam, D. (2017). Embedded formative assessment (2nd ed.). Solution Tree Press. https://www.solutiontree.com/embedded-formative-assessment-second-ed.html
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/case-study-research-and-applications/book250150
Zainul, A., & Nasution, N. (2019). Penilaian Hasil Belajar. Universitas Terbuka.


















