Instrumen Penilaian Holistik: Fondasi Evaluasi Hasil Belajar yang Valid dan Objektif Holistic Assessment Instruments: A Foundation for Valid and Objective Evaluation of Learning Outcomes
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
723-731
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/tsaqofah.v6i1.8341
Viewed: 285 times
Downloaded: 205 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Ahmad Rasyid Ridho1, Aminatus Sayidah2, Ahmad Al Mustofa3 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Learning outcomes assessment is a crucial component of the educational process because it determines the extent to which students’ competencies have been achieved. Assessment does not focus solely on the cognitive domain, which encompasses knowledge and understanding of subject matter, but also includes the affective domain related to students’ attitudes, motivation, and values demonstrated during learning, as well as the psychomotor domain that evaluates practical skills. This article conceptually examines the integration of these three domains in learning outcomes assessment as an effort to achieve holistic and comprehensive evaluation that reflects students’ overall development in intellectual, attitudinal, and skill-based aspects. This integrated assessment approach not only provides a foundation for teachers to design more effective, competency-oriented instructional strategies, but also encourages students to develop their potential optimally. The article underscores the importance of using valid, reliable, and objective assessment instruments so that evaluation results accurately and pedagogically accountably reflect students’ learning achievement.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Arifin, Z. (2012). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Arikunto, S. (2013). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. David McKay.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2007). Panduan Penilaian untuk Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Direktorat Pembinaan SMP, Direktorat Jenderal Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Fitriyani, F. N. (2023). Objek Asesmen Proses dan Hasil Belajar: Ranah Kognitif, Psikomotor, dan Afektif. INSANIA: Jurnal Pemikiran Alternatif Kependidikan, 22(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.24090/insania.v22i2.1222
Gagne, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1992). Principles of instructional design. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
Gao, R., Merzdorf, H. E., Anwar, S., Hipwell, M. C., & Srinivasa, A. (2023). Automatic assessment of text-based responses in post-secondary education: A systematic review. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.16151
Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook II: Affective domain. David McKay.
Latif, E., Chen, Y., Zhai, X., & Yin, Y. (2024). Human-centered design for AI-based automatically generated assessment reports: A systematic review. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.00081
Nurhasnah, Remiswal, R., & Sabri, A. (2023). Ranah Kognitif, Afektif, dan Psikomotorik sebagai Objek Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Jenis dan Model Evaluasi Pendidikan, serta Implikasinya dalam Pendidikan Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(3), 28204–28220. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v7i3.11169
Popham, W. J. (2009). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know (6th ed.). Pearson.
Putra, R. P. (2024). Objek evaluasi hasil belajar pendidikan agama Islam: Analisis taksonomi Bloom (kognitif, afektif, psikomotorik). Edu Global: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.56874/eduglobal.v5i1.1590
Putra, R. P., Yaqin, M. A., & Saputra, A. (2024). Objek evaluasi hasil belajar pendidikan agama Islam: Analisis taksonomi Bloom (kognitif, afektif, psikomotorik). AL-KARIM: Journal of Islamic and Educational Research, 2(1), 149–158. https://journal.institercom-edu.org/index.php/alkarim/article/view/236
Rahmawati, R., Junaenah, S., Alfiyyah, A. A., & Nugraha, E. (2024). Problematika menilai ranah kognitif, afektif, dan psikomotorik pada mata pelajaran IPAS Kurikulum Merdeka tingkat SD. PEDADIDAKTIKA: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 11(4), 613–622. https://doi.org/10.17509/pedadidaktika.v11i4.82877
Simatupang, F. P., Manalu, F. J., Siregar, A. S., Tampubolon, E. S., & Lubis, F. A. R. (2024). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar Kognitif, Afektif, dan Psikomotorik Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran PJOK di SMP N 2 Medan. Journal Physical Health Recreation, 5(3), 118–122.
Simpson, E. J. (1972). The classification of educational objectives in the psychomotor domain. Gryphon House.
Sudjana, N. (2017). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Suprihati, T., Rafiah, A., Dalalatul Iqtiran, F., Widyaningsih, P. R., & Risnita, R. (2023). Meta-Analisis: Evaluasi Hasil Belajar Ranah Kognitif, Afektif, dan Psikomotor pada Pembelajaran Sinkronus dan Asinkronus. TEACHING: Jurnal Inovasi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(4), 242–248. https://doi.org/10.51878/teaching.v3i4.2695
Susilawati, S. (2023). Evaluasi Penggunaan Teknik Penilaian Non-Tes dalam Mengukur Perkembangan Ranah Afektif dan Psikomotorik Siswa dalam Pembelajaran IPA di SDN 24 Kendari. MISOOL: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 5(2), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.47945/misool.v5i2.1903