Inkonstitusional Bersyarat dan Problem Kepastian Hukum dalam Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Conditional Unconstitutionality and the Problem of Legal Certainty in Judicial Review of Legislation
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
734-757
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ahkam.v5i1.9286
Viewed: 103 times
Downloaded: 66 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Atiek Pratiwi Putri Naue1*, Cassis Merinthia Ariapramuda2, Wicipto Setiadi3, Kaharuddin Kaharuddin4 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
The existence of Indonesia as a state based on law (rechtsstaat) places the Constitutional Court in a central position in guaranteeing constitutional supremacy and protecting citizens’ rights through a judicial review mechanism that is final and binding. However, the application of the conditionally unconstitutional decision model in the formal review of the Job Creation Law has given rise to debate regarding the stability of the national legal system because, on the one hand, it seeks to uphold democratic procedures, but on the other hand, it has the potential to create legal uncertainty with systemic impacts on society. This study aims to analyze the problems in the application of conditionally unconstitutional decisions in the formal review of laws and to formulate solution-oriented measures to strengthen legal certainty. This study employed a normative legal research method with statutory and conceptual approaches, which were analyzed descriptively-prescriptively based on various secondary legal materials. The results show that the practice of conditional unconstitutionality has transformed the role of the Constitutional Court from a negative legislator into a positive legislator that actively forms new norms. However, this practice has also created executorial obstacles and juridical ambiguity due to the absence of clear indicators and limitations in organic regulations. Thus, this study emphasizes the importance of redefining decision indicators that include deadlines for annulment, proportional room for institutional compromise, and original authority in reformulating execution in order to realize legal objectives that harmonize justice, expediency, and legal certainty for justice seekers in Indonesia.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Apippullah, A., Kurniawan, & Wardani, N. K. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kerugian Konsumen Atas Cacat Tersembunyi Pada Pembelian Kendaraan Bekas Online Berdasarkan UU No 8 Tahun 1999. Commerce Law, 4(2), 413–421. https://doi.org/10.29303/commercelaw.v4i2.5268
Asshiddiqie, J. (2005). Hukum Tata Negara dan Pilar-Pilar Demokrasi. Konstitusi Press.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara Jilid II. Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2020). Teori Hierarki Norma Hukum. Konpress.
Asyikin, N. (2020). Checks and balances legislatif eksekutif terhadap perjanjian internasional pasca putusan MK No. 13/PUU-XVI/2018. Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum, 3(2), 141–154.
Baital, B. (2014). Pertanggungjawaban Penggunaan Hak Prerogatif Presiden di Bidang Yudikatif dalam Menjamin Kemerdekaan Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Jurnal Cita Hukum, 2(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v1i1.1446
Chroust, A.-H. (1944). The philosophy of law of Gustav Radbruch. The Philosophical Review, 53(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/2181218
Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual. (2019). Modul Kekayaan Intelektual: Bidang Desain Industri. Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia.
Dirkareshza, R., Ardiantor, A., & Pradana, R. (2021). Penafsiran Hukum (Legal Interpretations) terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik demi Masyarakat yang Sejahtera, Adil, dan Makmur (Walfare State) (Standpoint Usul Perubahan terhadap UU Pelayanan Publik). Reformasi Hukum, 25(2), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.46257/jrh.v25i2.202
Febrianto, D., Evendia, M., & Putri, R. W. (2022). Hukum Koperasi dan UMKM Pasca UU Cipta Kerja. Pusaka Media.
Gilmour, P. M. (2020). Lifting the veil on beneficial ownership: Challenges of implementing the UK’s registers of beneficial owners. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 23(4), 717–734. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-02-2020-0014
Hastuti, P. (2018). Desentralisasi Fiskal dan Stabilitas Politik dalam Kerangka Pelaksanaan Otonomi Daerah di Indonesia. Simposium Nasional Keuangan Negara, 784–799.
Hermawan, S., & Herman. (2021). Kajian Terhadap Tindakan Administrasi pada Kekuasaan Yudikatif Pasca Berlakunya Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 18(1), 59–80. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v18i1.674
Kementerian Hukum Republik Indonesia. (2025). Peraturan Menteri Hukum Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2025 tentang Verifikasi dan Pengawasan Pemilik Manfaat Korporasi. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/314767/permenkum-no-2-tahun-2025
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2010). Naskah Komprehensif Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945: Latar Belakang, Proses, dan Hasil Pembahasan 1999–2002, Buku II: Sendi-Sendi/Fundamental Negara. Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia.
Marzuki, M. L. (2006). Berjalan-Jalan di Ranah Hukum. Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI.
Marzuki, P. M. (2010). Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Muiny, A. H. (2016). Implementasi Peraturan Bersama Komisi Yudisial 02/PB/P.KY/IX/2012 dan Mahkamah Agung 02/PB/MA/IX/2012 terhadap Perilaku Hakim [Skripsi, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta]. https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/30578
Nasir, M., Khoiriyah, E., Pamungkas, B. P., Hardianti, I., & Zildjianda, R. (2023). Kedudukan Hukum dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan di Indonesia. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 5(1), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2084
Nggilu, N., & Wantu, F. M. (2020). Menapaki Jalan Konstitusional Menuju Zaken Cabinet: Ikhtiar Mewujudkan Pemerintah Berkualitas Konstitusi. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 15(1), 126–140. https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v15i1.1653
Noviati, C. E. (2013). Demokrasi dan Sistem Pemerintahan. Jurnal Konstitusi, 10(2), 333–354. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1027
Patulak, A., & Giovanny, H. (2020). Optimalisasi Peran Ombudsman Republik Indonesia dalam Mendukung Sustainable Development Goals Nomor 16 (Target 16.6). Jurnal Legislatif, 3(2), 269–286. https://doi.org/10.20956/jl.v3i2.10471
Qoroni, W., & Winarwati, I. (2021). Kedaulatan Rakyat dalam Konteks Demokrasi di Indonesia. INICIO LEGIS, 2(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.21107/il.v2i1.11079
Radbruch, G. (2006). Statutory lawlessness and supra-statutory law (1946). Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqi041
Republik Indonesia. (1945). Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Risnain, M. (2013). Kriminalisasi Hakim dan Eksistensi Prinsip Judicial Independence dalam Bingkai Negara Hukum. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 2(3), 325–336. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.2.3.2013.325-336
Riyanto, S. (2023). Relasi Antara Konstitusionalitas Hak Asasi Manusia dan Kearifan Lokal Budaya Masyarakat dalam Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup. Jurnal Hukum Legalita, 5(2), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.47637/legalita.v5i2.978
Saepullah, A. (2018). Peranan Alat Bukti dalam Hukum Acara Peradilan. Mahkamah: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 3(1), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.24235/mahkamah.v3i1.2748
Sanjaya, D., & Rasji. (2022). Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020. Jurnal Hukum Adigama, 4(2), 3255–3279. https://doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v4i2.17910
Simatupang, T. H. (2017). Peran Perancang Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Kantor Wilayah Kementerian Hukum dan HAM dalam Rangka Harmonisasi Peraturan Daerah. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 11(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2017.V11.12-25
Sodiqin, A. (2021). Ambigiusitas Perlindungan Hukum Penyandang Disabilitas dalam Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 18(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v18i1.707
Susanto, M. (2016). Perkembangan Pemaknaan Hak Prerogatif Presiden. Jurnal Yudisial, 9(3), 237–258. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v9i3.9
Tambunan, Y. Y., Restu, K. A., Dahlia, M. L., & Natasya S., C. V. (2023). Telaah Konstitusi Check and Balances DPR atas Hak Prerogatif Presiden dalam Pengangkatan Pejabat Negara. Jurnal Relasi Publik, 1(2), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.59581/jrp-widyakarya.v1i2.327
Trimaya, A. (2016). Upaya Mewujudkan Penghormatan, Pelindungan, dan Pemenuhan Hak Penyandang Disabilitas Melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2016 tentang Penyandang Disabilitas. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 13(4), 401–409. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v13i4.85
Triwulan, T. (2016). Hukum Tata Usaha Negara dan Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Indonesia. Prenada Media.
Waliden, I. A. S., Maulida, S. F., & Rachmatulloh, M. A. (2022). Tinjauan Asas Equalty Before the Law terhadap Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Verfassung: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara, 1(2), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.30762/vjhtn.v1i2.186
Wardana, K. A., Setiyono, J., & Hardiwinoto, S. (2016). Relevansi Hukum Humaniter Internasional terhadap Perlindungan Jurnalis di Medan Perang (Studi Kasus Eksekusi Jurnalis Amerika James Foley dalam Konflik Bersenjata di Suriah). Diponegoro Law Journal, 5(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2016.10844
Wiyanto, A. (2015). Kekuasaan Membentuk Undang-Undang dalam Sistem Pemerintahan Presidensial Setelah Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan, 6(2), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v6i2.251
Wospakrik, D. (2018). Koalisi Partai Politik dalam Sistem Presidensil di Indonesia. Papua Law Journal, 1(1), 142–161. https://doi.org/10.31957/plj.v1i1.585
Wulandari, A. P. (2024). Platformisasi Pekerjaan Domestik bukan Solusi: Ekonomi Gig dan Peningkatan Kerentanan Perempuan Pekerja Rumah Tangga. In A. Hernawan, A. Novianto, & A. D. Wulansari (Eds.), Kemitraan Semu dalam Ekonomi Gig di Indonesia: Analisis terhadap Kondisi Pekerja Berstatus Mitra (pp. 55–72). IGPA Press.
Zulfan, Z. (2018). Analisis Pengaturan dan Praktik Pemisahan Kekuasaan Sistem Pemerintahan Presidensial Berdasarkan Konstitusi. Jurnal Media Hukum, 25(1), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.2018.0102.60-67