Hak Gugat bagi Pegawai Negeri Sipil (PNS) yang Diberhentikan Tidak dengan Hormat dengan Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara yang Didasarkan atas Putusan Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Right to Sue for Civil Servants (PNS) Who Are Dishonorably Dismissed by a State Administrative Decision Based on a Corruption Criminal Court Decision
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
2613-2636
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ahkam.v5i3.10550
Viewed: 0 times
Downloaded: 0 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Kharis Maulana Riatno1*, Suprapto Suprapto2 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Although the issue of dishonorable dismissal (PTDH) of Civil Servants (PNS) due to corruption crimes has been widely studied, research that specifically discusses the normative conflict between Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) Number 5 of 2021 and Government Regulation Number 79 of 2021 concerning ASN’s right to sue remains limited. This study aims to analyze the legality of restricting PNS’s right to sue through SEMA Number 5 of 2021 and to formulate the ideal concept of access to justice in the state administrative law system. This study used a normative legal method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Data were obtained through a literature study of primary and secondary legal materials, then analyzed qualitatively using prescriptive techniques. The results showed that the restriction of the right to sue through SEMA Number 5 of 2021 has the potential to create normative conflict, legal uncertainty, and restrictions on access to justice because it is not aligned with the right to legal remedies guaranteed under Government Regulation Number 79 of 2021. The findings also showed that PTDH decisions based on corruption criminal court decisions can still be reviewed in the state administrative court as long as the object of review is limited to administrative aspects. The conclusion of this study affirms that restricting PNS’s right to sue through the SEMA instrument needs to be positioned carefully so as not to reduce guarantees of legal protection in the state administrative law system. These findings imply the importance of harmonizing regulations on civil service dispute resolution and strengthening the concept of access to justice for ASN in obtaining fair, certain, and proportional legal protection.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Ali, A. (2009). Menguak Teori Hukum & Teori Peradilan: Legal Theory & Judicialprudence. Kencana.
Anggara, S. (2018). Hukum Administrasi Negara. Pustaka Setia.
Asmara, G., Sukmariningsih, R. M., Rahmi, E., Nuswardani, N., Madril, O., Pietersz, J. J., Is, M. S., Bagijo, H. E., Simatupang, D. P., Tjandra, W. R., Efendi, A., Aspan, Z., Sudrajat, T., & Azhar, M. (2025). Hukum Administrasi Negara. Rajawali Pers.
Aulia, D., Anggelina, D., Handayani, H., Hikmah, N., & Anwar, M. S. (2023). Eksistensi Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (PTUN) Sebagai Media Pengawasan di Lingkungan Masyarakat. JURNAL PENELITIAN SERAMBI HUKUM, 17(01), 42–49. https://journal.uniba.ac.id/index.php/SH/article/view/867
Dewata, M. F. N., & Achmad, Y. (2010). Dualisme Penelitian Normatif dan Empiris. Pustaka Pelajar.
Djamali, R. A. (2013). Pengantar Hukum Indonesia. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Erawan, D. I. I., Ilmar, A., & Mirzana, H. A. (2024). Pemberhentian Tidak dengan Hormat Aparatur Sipil Negara dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Gorontalo Law Review, 7(1), 156–179. https://doi.org/10.32662/golrev.v7i1.2904
Hadjon, P. M. (1987). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Rakyat di Indonesia. Bina Ilmu.
HR, R. (2011). Hukum Administrasi Negara (Edisi revisi). Rajawali Press.
Huda, N. (2010). Ilmu Negara. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Isretno, E. (2020). Hukum Administrasi Negara: Pengantar Kajian tentang Kewenangan & Kebijakan Pemerintah. Cintya Press.
Kaban, D. H. E., Putri, K. A., Paksi, A. P., & Triadi, I. (2024). Konsep Negara Hukum dalam Perspektif Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia (The Concept Rule of Law From the Perspective of Indonesian Constitutional Law). Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 2(3). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11670332
Karmin. (2024). Asas Equality Before the Law: Perspektif Historis dan Penerapannya di Indonesia. Policy and Law Journal, 1(2), 80–88.
Kelsen, H. (1967). Pure theory of law. University of California Press.
Lubis, F., Ayuni, N. P., Indah, D. V., Purba, N. Z., Ibadurrahman, T., & Maliha, Z. (2025). Kajian Asas-Asas Equality Before the Law dalam Praktik Peradilan Perdata. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 5(3), 5390–5406. https://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative/article/view/19521
Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Otto, J. M. (2003). Kepastian Hukum di Negara Berkembang (T. Moeliono, Penerj.). Komisi Hukum Nasional Republik Indonesia.
Pamuji, K., Nasihuddin, A. A., Kartono, Kunarti, S., Sudrajat, T., Handayani, S. W., Hartini, S., Kupita, W., & Cahyani, E. D. (2023). Hukum Administrasi Negara. Unsoed Press.
Radbruch, G. (2006). Five minutes of legal philosophy (1945). Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26(1), 13–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqi042
Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press.
Susilo, E., Din, M., Suhaimi, & Mansur, T. M. (2025). Access to justice: An effective pretrial model to guarantee the right to defense for suspects in Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 14(2), 317–350. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.14.2.2025.317-350
Sutrsino, A. (2025). Peran Hakim dalam Mewujudkan Due Process of Law pada Sistem Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara di Indonesia. Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum, 5(1), 17–28. https://jurnal.locusmedia.id/index.php/jkih/article/view/434
Syam, F., Helmi, H., & Fitria, F. (2020). Pengujian Keputusan Pemberhentian Tidak dengan Hormat sebagai Pegawai Negeri Sipil di Peradilan Administrasi. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 20(1), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020.V20.49-70
Tanya, B. L., Simanjuntak, Y. N., & Hage, M. Y. (2013). Teori Hukum: Strategi Tertib Manusia Lintas Ruang dan Generasi. Genta Publishing.
Wijayanti, S., Sari, Z. N., Salam, S., & Firdaus, A. A. (2024). Norm clash in Lex Superior Derogate Legi Inferiori principle’s implementation on circular letters and laws. Reformasi Hukum, 28(3), 234–250. https://doi.org/10.46257/jrh.v28i3.732