Badan Pertanahan Nasional sebagai Mediator dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Pasca Permen ATR/BPN RI No. 21 Tahun 2020 National Land Agency as a Mediator in the Resolution of Land Disputes after Ministerial Regulation ATR/BPN RI No. 21 of 2020
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
3255-3267
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ahkam.v5i3.11014
Viewed: 1 times
Downloaded: 0 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Muhammad Khaikal Fajri1*, Erlina Erlina2 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Although land disputes in Indonesia have been widely studied, discussions that specifically examine structural conflicts of interest in the dual role of the National Land Agency (BPN) as both certificate issuer and mediator remain limited. This study aims to analyze the authority and position of BPN as a mediator over its own legal products and to examine the legal certainty and executorial force of mediation outcomes based on Regulation of the Minister of ATR/BPN Number 21 of 2020. This study used a normative legal research method with statutory, conceptual, and analytical approaches. The legal materials used included primary legal materials in the form of laws and regulations and court decisions at four judicial levels, secondary legal materials in the form of legal doctrines and previous studies, and tertiary legal materials as supporting sources. Data were collected through library research and analyzed using normative juridical analysis techniques. The results showed that BPN’s mediation authority is facilitative-administrative in nature and contains three forms of structural conflict of interest, namely reputational, informational, and judicial conflicts, which are inherently contrary to the principle of nemo iudex in causa sua. In addition, the Deed of Settlement resulting from BPN mediation has the status only of a private deed without executorial title and has been proven weak at four judicial levels. These findings contribute to the development of administrative law theory and land law, particularly regarding the institutional design of mediation functions and understanding of structural bias in administrative dispute resolution mechanisms. The conclusion of this study affirms the importance of institutional separation of the mediator function and the granting of executorial title through statutory revision. The implications of this study include theoretical contributions to the development of literature on administrative law and land dispute resolution, as well as practical implications for the government and legislative institutions in reforming land mediation regulations to ensure substantive legal certainty and structural impartiality.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Asmawati. (2014). Mediasi Salah Satu Cara dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jambi, 5(1). https://www.neliti.com/publications/43283/mediasi-salah-satu-cara-dalam-penyelesaian-sengketa-pertanahan
Badrulzaman, M. D. (1983). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata Buku III tentang Hukum Perikatan dengan Penjelasan. Alumni.
Bidasari, A., Djou, A. M. G., Zulfikri, Z., Utami, N. F., & Raudhoh, H. S. (2025). Kekuatan Eksekutorial Akta Perdamaian dalam Perkara Sengketa Ekonomi Perspektif Hukum Perdata. Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains, 8(6), 3835–3843. https://jurnal.unismuhpalu.ac.id/index.php/JKS/article/view/7915
Dani, S. (2023). Efektivitas Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan melalui Mekanisme Alternative Dispute Resolution Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia [Master’s thesis, Universitas Darul Ulum Islamic Centre Sudirman GUPPI]. https://repository.undaris.ac.id/id/eprint/1041/
Dewata, M. F. N., & Achmad, Y. (2010). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif & Empiris. Pustaka Pelajar.
Fallonne, A. E., & Handayani, S. W. (2025). Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Atas Tanah Adat di Badan Pertanahan Nasional. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 3(5), 7369–7372. https://ejournal.yayasanpendidikandzurriyatulquran.id/index.php/AlZayn/article/view/2343
Feril, H. (2025). Penyelesaian Sengketa Tumpang Tindih Sertifikat Hak Guna Bangunan dengan Hak Milik: Studi Kasus Tumpang Tindih Sertifikat Hak Guna Bangunan Nomor 00538/Nagara Lingkuang Aua. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6(9). https://ojs.rewangrencang.com/index.php/JHLG/article/view/1580
Kalsum, U. (2023). Analisis Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan melalui Mediasi di Kantor Badan Pertanahan Nasional Kabupaten Gowa [Tesis, Universitas Hasanuddin]. https://repository.unhas.ac.id/id/eprint/24444/
Kementerian Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Badan Pertanahan Nasional. (2025, October 24). Setahun Menteri Nusron: Selesaikan 3.019 Kasus Pertanahan, Cegah Kerugian Rp9,67 Triliun. https://www.atrbpn.go.id/berita/setahun-menteri-nusron-selesaikan-3019-kasus-pertanahan-cegah-kerugian-rp967-triliun
Kurniati, N. (2016). “Mediasi-Arbitrase” untuk Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah. Sosiohumaniora, 18(3), 197–207. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v18i3.10008
Kurniati, N., & Fakhriah, E. L. (2017). BPN Sebagai Mediator dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah di Indonesia Pasca Perkaban No. 11 Tahun 2016. Sosiohumaniora, 19(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v19i2.11999
Mulyana, D. (2019). Kekuatan Hukum Hasil Mediasi di Dalam Pengadilan dan di Luar Pengadilan Menurut Hukum Positif. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 3(2), 177–198. https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v3i2.224
Nur, Z. (2023). Keadilan dan Kepastian Hukum: Refleksi Kajian Filsafat Hukum dalam Pemikiran Hukum Imam Syâtibî. Misykat Al-Anwar Jurnal Kajian Islam dan Masyarakat, 6(2), 247–272. https://doi.org/10.24853/ma.6.2.247-272
Prayogo, R. T. (2016). Penerapan Asas Kepastian Hukum dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2011 tentang Hak Uji Materiil dan dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 06/PMK/2005 tentang Pedoman Beracara dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 13(2), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v13i2.151
Rizqi, M. (2025). Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah melalui Mediasi di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6(9). https://ojs.rewangrencang.com/index.php/JHLG/article/view/1833
Rosiana, & Junaidi. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Penyelesaiaan Sengketa Tanah melalui Mediasi. Jurnal Rechten: Riset Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 4(2), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.52005/rechten.v4i2.101
Sahnan, S., Arba, M., & Suhartana, L. W. P. (2019). Kewenangan Badan Pertanahan Nasional dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, 7(3), 436–450. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v7i3.714
Sembiring, N. B. (2025). Land case mediation at BPN as a form of national land law development. Jurnal Smart Hukum (JSH), 3(2), 206–215. https://doi.org/10.55299/jsh.v3i2.1186
Soekanto, S. (2006). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Universitas Indonesia Press.
Taufiq, M., Madiong, B., & Tira, A. (2022). Analisis Hukum Penyelesaiaan Sengketa Hak Atas Tanah di Kawasan Waduk Tunggu Pampang Kota Makassar. Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law, 5(1), 145–150. https://doi.org/10.35965/ijlf.v5i1.1894
Udak, P. A. L., Stefanus, K. Y., & Tupen, R. R. (2024). Penerapan Asas Nemo Judex in Causa Sua terhadap Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia dalam Menguji Undang-Undang terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Petitum Law Journal, 1(2), 645–655. https://doi.org/10.35508/pelana.v1i2.15323
Widodo, D., Meidira, H., Siregar, L. A., Zola, P., & Medaline, O. (2026). Peran BPN Sebagai Mediator dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah. Seminar Nasional Hukum, Sosial dan Ekonomi, 5(1), 383–393. https://jurnal.umsu.ac.id/index.php/sanksi/article/view/30368