Penggunaan Tanda Tangan Digital dalam Pembuatan Akta Notaris Menurut Perspektif Hukum Progresif Use of Digital Signatures in the Preparation of Notarial Deeds from the Perspective of Progressive Law

Crossmark

Article Sidebar

Page Numbers: 3268-3285
Download PDF
Published: Jul 4, 2026
Digital Object Identifier: 10.58578/ahkam.v5i3.11015
Save this to:
Save to Mendeley Download RIS

Article Metrics:
Viewed: 55 times
Downloaded: 39 times
Article can trace at:

Author Fee:
Free Publication Fees for Foreign Researchers (USD 0.00)
Check for article on SINTA:

LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers

Connected Papers:
Connected Papers


Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.


Authors:
Anita Amalia1*, Anang Shophan Tornado2
Copyright :

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.

Explore Our Journals
Find the journal that best fits your research. If this journal does not match your manuscript’s scope, explore our portfolio below to select a more suitable publication venue.

Main Article Content

Anita Amalia
Universitas Lambung Mangkurat
Anang Shophan Tornado
Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Abstract

Although digital transformation in notarial practice has received attention in various previous studies, research that specifically discusses the weaknesses of conventional signatures and the feasibility of digital signatures as their replacement from the perspective of progressive law remains limited. This study aims to analyze the weaknesses of conventional signatures in the preparation of notarial deeds and to assess the feasibility of digital signatures as an alternative replacement based on the perspective of progressive law. This study used a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches. Data were collected through library research on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, and then analyzed using descriptive qualitative techniques. The results showed that conventional signatures have fundamental weaknesses. Philosophically, conventional signatures are contrary to substantive justice because they may discriminate against people in remote areas and persons with disabilities. Juridically, conventional signatures are vulnerable to forgery and denial, lack a non-repudiation mechanism, and may lead to the degradation of the legal force of authentic deeds. Sociologically, conventional signatures create structural exclusion and inefficiency in notarial services. Practices in the United States, Germany, France, Belgium, Estonia, and Singapore show that digital signatures have been implemented in notarial systems using varied approaches. These findings contribute to the development of notarial law theory and expand understanding of legal reform in the digital era. The conclusion of this study affirms that regulatory harmonization between the Notary Office Law and the Electronic Information and Transactions Law is an important prerequisite for the implementation of digital signatures in notarial deeds. The implications of this study include theoretical contributions to the development of notarial law literature and practical implications for the government in explicitly revising the Notary Office Law and strengthening the digital infrastructure of notarial practice.

Keywords:
Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Sauku V.H. (2027)
    Digital Transformation of Career Counseling in Albania: Amelora Platform
    Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 2043 LNNS, 735-746
  2. Kontodimas K. (2027)
    Energy Data Sharing Through Data Spaces with DATAMITE: Supporting Digital Transformation
    IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 796 IFIPAICT, 179-192
  3. Kurniawan A. (2027)
    Development of SpeakUp digital platform based on digital literacy and local wisdom to improve English speaking competence of vocational students
    Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 9(1)

Article Details

How to Cite
Amalia, A., & Tornado, A. S. (2026). Penggunaan Tanda Tangan Digital dalam Pembuatan Akta Notaris Menurut Perspektif Hukum Progresif. AHKAM, 5(3), 3268-3285. https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v5i3.11015

Creative Commons License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Author Biography

Anang Shophan Tornado, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

References

Adjie, H. (2018). Kebatalan dan Pembatalan Akta Notaris (Cet. 4). Refika Aditama.

Amalia, N. R., & Zulaeha, M. (2025). Notaris Sebagai Konten Kreator Penyuluhan Hukum dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris. Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains, 8(8), 5101–5112. https://jurnal.unismuhpalu.ac.id/index.php/JKS/article/view/8095

Aulia, M. Z. (2018). Hukum Progresif dari Satjipto Rahardjo: Riwayat, Urgensi, dan Relevansi. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 1(1), 159–185. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.1.1.159-185

Erliyani, R. (2020). Metode Penelitian dan Penulisan Hukum (Cet. 1). Magnum Pustaka Utama.

Erliyani, R., & Hamdan, S. R. (2023). Akta Notaris dalam Pembuktian Perkara Perdata dan Perkembangan Cyber Notary. Dialektika.

Fadhila, A. R. (2021). Teori Hukum Progresif (Prof. Dr. Satjipto Rahardjo, S.H.). Sinda: Comprehensive Journal of Islamic Social Studies, 1(1), 122–132. https://doi.org/10.28926/sinda.v1i1.966

Ginting, S. N. B., Purba, H., & Tony. (2025). Potensi Tanda Tangan Digital (Digital Signature) jika Dimuat dalam Akta Notaris demi Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v6i4.2154

Gozali, D. S. (2021). Ilmu Hukum dan Penelitian Ilmu Hukum (Melania, Noorhafidah, & Ifrani, Eds.). UII Press.

Kurniawan, R. (2022). Kekuatan Hukum Tanda Tangan Elektronik dalam Kontrak menurut Hukum Positif Indonesia. Dinamika, 28(2), 3361–3373. https://jim.unisma.ac.id/index.php/jdh/article/view/14534

Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum (Edisi revisi). Prenada Media.

Mayana, R. F., & Santika, T. (2021). Legalitas Tanda Tangan Elektronik: Posibilitas dan Tantangan Notary Digitalization di Indonesia. Acta Diurnal: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan, 4(2), 244–262. https://doi.org/10.23920/acta.v4i2.517

Mertokusumo, S. (1993). Bab-Bab tentang Penemuan Hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Pesulima, A. S. (2024). Kedudukan Hukum Akta Autentik yang Dicap/Distempel Menggantikan Tanda Tangan Notaris Dihubungkan dengan Kepastian Hukum [Tesis, Universitas Islam Bandung]. https://reputasi.unisba.ac.id/index.php?p=show_detail&id=126

Pramono, D. (2015). Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta yang Dibuat oleh Notaris selaku Pejabat Umum menurut Hukum Acara Perdata di Indonesia. Lex Jurnalica, 12(3), 248–258. https://ejurnal.esaunggul.ac.id/index.php/Lex/article/view/1225

Pramudyo, E., Mayana, R. F., & Ramli, T. S. (2021). Tinjauan Yuridis Penerapan Cyber Notary Berdasarkan Perspektif UU ITE dan UUJN. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, 2(8), 1239–1258. https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v2i08.382

Pratama, Y. O., Yetniwati, & Suryahartati, D. (2022). Makna Berhadapan dengan Notaris pada Akta Risalah Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham yang Diselenggarakan secara Elektronik dalam Perspektif Peraturan Perundang-undangan. Wacana Paramarta: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 21(2), 58–69. https://journalfh.unla.ac.id/index.php/paramarta/article/view/167

Purwanto, T. J., & Purwoadmojo, D. (2023). Tinjauan Yuridis Legalitas Penggunaan Tanda Tangan Elektronik dalam Akta Notaris. Notarius, 16(2), 989–997. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v16i2.42261

Putri, R. H., & M.S., E. R. (2024). Legalitas Tanda Tangan Elektronik terhadap Akta Notaris. Notarius, 17(1), 547–564. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v17i1.44078

Rizkianti, W., Hutabarat, S. M. D., Nugroho, A. A., Firdaus, M. B., & Latri, A. A. (2025). Cyber Notary di Indonesia: Tantangan, Peluang dan Kebutuhan Rekonstruksi Hukum. Notaire, 8(1), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.20473/ntr.v8i1.67806

Rizqiya, A., & Mahfud, M. A. (2024). Perkembangan Cyber Notary di Indonesia dan Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta Notaris dalam Era Digital. Notarius, 17(3), 2430–2448. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v17i3.65792

Salsabila, P. N. T., & Patras, G. (2022). Legalitas Penggunaan Tanda Tangan Digital dalam Akta Notaris Berdasarkan Hukum Positif di Indonesia. SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i, 9(6), 1947–1958. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v9i6.27529

Triantama, M. I. (2025). Urgensi Penerapan Digitalisasi Tanda Tangan Elektronik dalam Pembuatan Akta Notaris [Master’s thesis, Sriwijaya University]. https://repository.unsri.ac.id/172271/

Zamit, A. J., & Alfath, T. P. (2025). Penggunaan Tanda Tangan Elektronik Para Pihak dalam Akta Notaris dengan Menggunakan Aplikasi Pihak Ketiga. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik, 5(5), 4119–4128. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v5i5.4933

Zulfikar, Z. (2024). Digitalisasi Akta Notaris Sebagai Tantangan dan Peluang dalam Menjaga Keutuhan Dokumen Hukum. Lex Lectio Law Journal, 3(2), 91–105. https://jurnalgrahakirana.ac.id/index.php/JLL/article/view/94