Tanggung Jawab Notaris atas Kelalaian Memeriksa Status Hukum dalam Pembuatan Akta Pengalihan Hak Paten yang Telah Gugur The Liability of Notaries for Negligence in Examining Legal Status in the Preparation of a Deed of Transfer of Patent Rights That Have Lapsed
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
3179-3190
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ahkam.v5i3.10959
Viewed: 2 times
Downloaded: 0 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Siti Rahmah1*, Anang Shophan Tornado2 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Although notarial responsibility has received attention in various legal studies, research that specifically discusses notarial negligence in verifying the legal status of expired intellectual property rights, particularly patent rights, remains limited. This study aims to analyze whether a notary can be deemed negligent if they fail to examine the legal status of a lapsed patent right before preparing a deed of transfer and to examine the legal consequences arising from such negligence. This study used a normative legal research method with statutory, conceptual, and analytical approaches. The legal materials used consisted of primary legal materials in the form of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Notary Position, Law Number 13 of 2016 concerning Patents, the Indonesian Civil Code, as well as relevant legal regulations and doctrines. The data were analyzed prescriptively using the theory of fault, the theory of legal protection, the theory of negligence, the theory of prudence, and the theory of legal events. The results show that a notary can be deemed negligent if they do not verify the legal status of the patent right that becomes the object of transfer because a notary is required to act honestly, carefully, independently, and with full prudence in carrying out their office. Examining the legal status of a patent right is part of the application of the principle of prudence to ensure that the right being transferred remains valid and can become the object of a legal act. Negligence in such verification has implications for the notary’s legal liability and has the potential to weaken legal certainty in patent right transfer transactions. The conclusion of this study emphasizes the importance of verifying legal status before preparing a deed of transfer of patent rights. These findings provide a theoretical contribution to the development of the literature on notarial law and intellectual property law, as well as practical implications for notaries, legal practitioners, and policymakers in strengthening legal certainty in intangible asset transactions.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Adjie, H. (2014). Hukum Notaris Indonesia: Tafsir Tematik terhadap UU No. 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris (Edisi ke-4). Refika Aditama.
Berutu, C. A. N., Muktar, Wardhani, Y., Ambarsari, N., & Fitrian, Y. (2024). Tanggung Jawab Notaris secara Hukum dalam Pembuatan Akta. Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains, 7(6), 2145–2151. https://jurnal.unismuhpalu.ac.id/index.php/JKS/article/view/5494
Calvin, C. (2025). Kewenangan Notaris dalam Memberikan Konsultasi Hukum di Luar Akta Notaris: Telaah terhadap Kode Etik dan Tanggung Jawab Sosial Notaris [Tesis magister, Universitas Sumatera Utara]. https://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/107898
Damaiyanti, A., & Roisah, K. (2024). Peran Notaris dalam Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual: Studi Komparatif Praktik Hukum Indonesia dan Standar Internasional. UNES Law Review, 6(4), 11624–11632. https://review-unes.com/law/article/view/2103
Darusman, Y. M. (2016). Kedudukan serta Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pemegang Hak Paten dalam Kerangka Hukum Nasional Indonesia dan Hukum Internasional. Yustisia, 5(1), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v5i1.8732
Erliyani, R. (2020). Metode Penelitian dan Penulisan Hukum (Cet. 1). Magnum Pustaka Utama. https://repo-dosen.ulm.ac.id/handle/123456789/17326
Fail, A. S., & Mispansyah. (2025). Legal liability for false information in notarial deeds. JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review, 7(1), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.56371/jirpl.v7i1.470
Juandini, E. (2025). Analisis Pertanggungjawaban Notaris atas Kelalaian Menerbitkan Akta Palsu dalam Perspektif UU No. 2 Tahun 2014 jo. UU No. 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris (Studi Kasus ART Riri, Edriyanto vs. Nirina Zubir). Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 8(2), 4071–4076. https://doi.org/10.31004/jrpp.v8i2.44446
Lukman, C. A. P., & Silviana, A. (2025). Tanggung Jawab Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta Pelepasan Hak Milik Adat yang Masih dalam Sengketa (Studi Putusan Nomor 412/Pdt.G/2021/PN Bks). Jurnal Yustisiabel, 9(2), 300–320. https://doi.org/10.32529/yustisiabel.v9i2.4425
Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. Prenada Media.
Merges, R. P. (2023). Updating the private law of patent contracting. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4565338
Muhammad, A. R., & Adjie, H. (2025). Penerapan Asas Kehati-hatian Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta Autentik untuk Meminimalisir Terjadinya Keterangan Palsu Hak Waris Sesuai dengan Kewenangannya. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik, 5(5), 4129–4135. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v5i5.4992
Mustakim, & Gadeng, T. P. (2026). Tanggung Jawab Notaris terhadap Akta Autentik yang Dibuat secara Berlaku Surut. Jurnal BATAVIA, 2(5), 295–304. https://journal.zhatainstitut.org/index.php/batavia/article/view/203
Pratama, B., Warsito, H., & Adriansyah, H. (2022). Prinsip Kehati-hatian dalam Membuat Akta oleh Notaris. Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan, 11(1), 24–33. https://journal.fh.unsri.ac.id/index.php/repertorium/article/view/1640
Rahman, F. A. (2018). Penerapan Prinsip Kehati-hatian Notaris dalam Mengenal Para Penghadap. Lex Renaissance, 3(2), 423–440. https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol3.iss2.art11
Ramdhan, D., Djaja, B., & Sudirman, M. (2025). Analisis Yuridis Mengenai Tanggung Jawab Notaris atas Pembuatan Akta yang Cacat Hukum. Mutiara: Multidiciplinary Scientifict Journal, 3(10), 947–956. https://doi.org/10.57185/mutiara.v3i10.443
Suawah, E. I. O. (2026). Tanggung Jawab Notaris pada Akta yang Cacat Hukum. Lex Crimen, 14(4). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/66631
Syahbana, T. R. F. (2025). Peran Notaris untuk Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum Pengalihan Hak Merek Terdaftar dalam Pelaksanaan Homologasi Akibat Debitor Pailit. Jurnal Notarius, 11(2), 84–99. https://jurnal.umsu.ac.id/index.php/notarius/article/view/26759
Wahid, A. I., Mahka, M. F. R., & Sufriaman, S. (2024). Responsibilities of notaries as a public official in making authentic deeds. JIHAD: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.58258/jihad.v6i2.6936
Yahanan, A., & Elmadiantini, E. (2019). Akta Notaril: Keharusan atau Pilihan dalam Peralihan Kekayaan Intelektual. Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal, 4(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.32801/abc.v4i1.78