Rekonstruksi Regulasi Keotentikan Akta Notaris dalam Penggunaan Tanda Tangan Elektronik pada Pelayanan Kenotariatan di Indonesia Reconstruction of Regulations on the Authenticity of Notarial Deeds in the Use of Electronic Signatures in Notarial Services in Indonesia
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
2964-2984
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ahkam.v5i3.10813
Viewed: 46 times
Downloaded: 29 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:Karinawati Karinawati1*, Ifrani Ifrani2
Copyright :Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Although electronic signatures have been legally recognized in Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions, legal certainty regarding the authenticity of Notarial deeds using electronic signatures in Indonesia still faces regulatory harmonization issues. This study aims to analyze the legal synchronization between conventional and digital systems in the signing of Notarial deeds and to formulate an ideal regulatory construction for the development of electronic signatures in notarial services in Indonesia. This study employed normative legal research with a prescriptive-analytical type through statutory, conceptual, and comparative legal approaches. Legal materials were collected through a literature study covering primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, and were then analyzed using legal interpretation, synchronization, and harmonization techniques. The results showed horizontal disharmony between Article 16 paragraph (1) letter m of the Notary Position Law, which requires the physical presence of the parties in the reading and signing of deeds, and Article 11 of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, which recognizes the validity of electronic signatures based on the principle of functional equivalence. Certified electronic signatures, electronic certificates, and digital verification systems have fulfilled the functions of authentication, identification, integrity, and non-repudiation. However, the unmet requirement of physical presence may cause electronic deeds to lose their authentic nature. This finding contributes to the development of notarial science and cyber law, particularly in understanding the transformation of notarial services in the digital era. The conclusion of this study emphasizes the importance of regulatory harmonization through the revision of the Notary Position Law to accommodate virtual presence and the use of certified electronic signatures. The implications of this study include theoretical contributions to the development of notarial law and cyber law literature, as well as practical implications for the government, the Indonesian Notary Association, and Notaries in formulating policies for the digitalization of notarial services. This study also opens opportunities for further research on the implementation of digital identity systems and data protection in cyber notary practice.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles
-
A.g S. (2027)Polymer-bitumen compositions for improving the energy efficiency of road constructionKompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 341(2), 97-104
-
Tang Z. (2027)Technological paths for enhancing renewable energy integration: Modeling, optimization, and practical prospectsElectric Power Systems Research, 264
-
Herzlinger G. (2027)The Acheulean Large Cutting Tool Assemblage from Rodafnidia, Lesvos: A 3D Morpho-technological Cross-regional Comparative AnalysisJournal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 34(1)
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Alamanda, M. D., & Anindita, S. L. (2025). Tantangan dan Prospek Cyber Notary di Indonesia. Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 10(5), 4751–4766. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v10i5.58183
Anshori, I., Rahmi, E., & Syamsir, S. (2022). Polemik Penerapan Tanda Tangan Elektronik dalam Pembuatan Akta Otentik. Recital Review, 4(2), 353–373. https://doi.org/10.22437/rr.v4i2.18863
Danuri, M. (2019). Perkembangan dan Transformasi Teknologi Digital. Jurnal Ilmiah Infokam, 15(2), 116–123. https://doi.org/10.53845/infokam.v15i2.178
Fadhilah, S., & Putrijanti, A. (2025). Harmonisasi Pengaturan Cyber Notary dalam Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris di Era Digitalisasi. Notarius, 18(3), 611–626. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v18i3.65545
Farahianie, S. (2024). Kedudukan Hukum Akta Autentik yang Dibuat oleh Notaris dalam Perspektif Cyber Notary. Acten Journal Law Review, 1(2), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.71087/ajlr.v1i2.13
Girsang, W. F. E., Kurniawan, K., & Haq, L. M. H. (2023). Legal force of validity of notarial deed signed with electronic signature: Comparative study between Indonesian law and Australian law. Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, 128, 71–81. https://doi.org/10.7176/JLPG/128-10
Hjort, M. A., Kalamees, P., & Kask, L. (2025). Misuse of electronic signatures and eID owner liability: A comparative analysis of Estonian and Norwegian legislative frameworks and practice. European Business Law Review, 36(2), 287–312. https://doi.org/10.54648/EULR2025012
Mayana, R. F., & Santika, T. (2021). Legalitas Tanda Tangan Elektronik: Posibilitas dan Tantangan Notary Digitalization di Indonesia. Acta Diurnal: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan, 4(2), 244–262. https://doi.org/10.23920/acta.v4i2.517
Mertokusumo, S. (n.d.). Hukum acara perdata Indonesia. https://search.catalog.loc.gov/instances/009d2833-42fd-5226-A082-C43ecf455d97
Mustafa. (2024). Metodologi penelitian hukum: Aplikasi teknologi dan pendekatan multidisiplin. CV Eureka Media Aksara. https://repository.penerbiteureka.com/publications/569170/metodologi-penelitian-hukum-aplikasi-teknologi-dan-pendekatan-multidisiplin
Omiyani, S., Suprapto, S., & Saprudin, S. (2024). Digitalisasi Tandatangan secara Elektronik dengan Menggunakan Akta Notaris. Notary Law Journal, 3(1), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.32801/nolaj.v3i1.55
Pranihita, T. A., Wesna, P. A. S., & Santika, I. B. A. P. (2026). The validity of notarial deeds using electronic signatures. Journal of Social Research, 5(6), 2526–2532. https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v5i6.3194
Purwanto, T. J., & Purwoadmojo, D. (2023). Tinjauan Yuridis Legalitas Penggunaan Tanda Tangan Elektronik dalam Akta Notaris. Notarius, 16(2), 989–997. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v16i2.42261
Raditya, A., Wardana, D. J., Soeparna, I. I., Kurniawan, F., Anand, G., & Bustami, M. R. (2025). Notaries and the digital era: Validity of electronic deeds and legal protection in Indonesian law. Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 27(3), 684–705. https://doi.org/10.24815/kjih.v27i3.138
Rihhadatul’aisy, R., Mayana, R. F., & Ramli, T. S. (2026). Cyber Notary sebagai Pembaharuan Hukum: Urgensi dan Tantangan dalam Implementasinya. Jurnal USM Law Review, 9(2), 909–933. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v9i2.13838
Sasmita, N. N. N., & Mayasari, I. D. A. D. (2021). Keabsahan Akta yang Dibuat oleh Notaris dengan Digital Signature. Acta Comitas: Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, 6(2), 288–299. https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2021.v06.i02.p06
Senantya, D. C., Rahmasari, F., & Liusyadi, I. G. Z. (2025). Analisis Transformasi Pelayanan Notaris di Era Digital: Studi tentang Tanda Tangan Elektronik dalam Akta Otentik. Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin, 4(2), 823–831. https://doi.org/10.38035/jim.v4i2.959
Solihin, F., Budi, I., Aji, R. F., & Makarim, E. (2021). Advancement of information extraction use in legal documents. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 35(3), 322–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2021.1964225
Susskind, R. (2019). Online courts and the future of justice. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198838364.001.0001
Velmet, A. (2025). Free to choose: E-voting, infrastructure and the origins of Estonia’s digital republic. Contemporary European History, 34(3), 843–860. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960777324000031
Wiguna, B. A., Ikhwansyah, I., & Mayana, R. F. (2024). Harmonisasi Peraturan Penyimpanan Protokol Notaris Digital. Acta Diurnal: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan, 7(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.23920/acta.v7i2.1840
Wiranata, A. R. (2021). Analisis Pembuatan Akta Notaris secara Elektronik. Al Qodiri: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Keagamaan, 19(1), 408–421. https://ejournal.kopertais4.or.id/tapalkuda/index.php/qodiri/article/view/4307
Yurika, V. Y. (2025). Pengaturan Penerapan E-Signature pada Akta Otentik sebagai Pengamanan Inovasi Digital di Indonesia. Otentik’s: Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, 7(1), 110–137. https://doi.org/10.35814/otentik.v7i1.7939