Kewenangan Notaris dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa atas Akta yang Dibuatnya Authority of Notaries in the Resolution of Disputes over Deeds They Have Drafted
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
3009-3032
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ahkam.v5i3.10880
Viewed: 1 times
Downloaded: 0 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Sa’adiyah Nur Hizrah1*, M. Hadin Muhjad2 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Although the role of notaries as public officials in preparing authentic deeds has been widely studied, discussions that specifically examine the authority of notaries as mediators in resolving disputes over deeds they have prepared themselves and the legal implications arising from this role remain limited. This study aims to analyze whether dispute resolution is part of a notary’s authority when acting as a mediator for deeds they have prepared, as well as to examine the legal implications arising from the exercise of this role. This study used a qualitative approach with a normative legal research design through a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials were obtained through literature study and were then analyzed prescriptively through interpretation of relevant laws and regulations, doctrines, and literature. The results showed that the Notary Position Law does not explicitly grant notaries the authority to act as mediators in resolving disputes over deeds they have prepared. However, the authority of notaries to provide legal counseling, as regulated in Article 15 paragraph (2) letter e of the Notary Position Law, may serve as an argumentative basis for notarial involvement in assisting the parties in resolving disputes through non-litigation mechanisms. On the other hand, the involvement of notaries as mediators may create a conflict of interest because notaries have a direct relationship with the deed that becomes the object of the dispute, which may affect the principles of mediator independence and neutrality. This finding contributes to the development of notarial law studies, particularly regarding the limits of notarial authority in alternative dispute resolution mechanisms. The conclusion of this study emphasizes the importance of clearer regulation concerning the position, authority, and mechanisms of notaries as mediators to ensure legal certainty and prevent conflicts of interest. The implications of this study include theoretical contributions to the development of notarial law and alternative dispute resolution, as well as practical implications for lawmakers and notarial professional organizations in formulating regulations that accommodate the role of notaries as mediators in a professional manner.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Abdillah, M. N. F., Wardah, S. N. R. S., & Cahyani, I. N. (2024). Etika Profesi Hukum Notaris Ditinjau dari Pemikiran Tiga Nilai Dasar Hukum Gustav Radbruch. Jurnal Ilmiah Nusantara, 1(4), 208–216. https://doi.org/10.61722/jinu.v1i4.1702
Afriana, A. (2020). Kedudukan dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris sebagai Pihak dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata di Indonesia Terkait Akta yang Dibuatnya. Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran, 1(2), 246–261. https://doi.org/10.23920/jphp.v1i2.250
Amin, M., Nakiyah, J., & Ramadhani, N. R. (2025). Etika Notaris: Kepribadian, Pelayanan, Tugas, Wewenang, dan Penegakan Kode Etik. Journal Sains Student Research, 3(2), 655–664. https://doi.org/10.61722/jssr.v3i2.4392
Andrianto, F. (2020). Kepastian Hukum dalam Politik Hukum di Indonesia. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 3(1), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v3i1.114-123
Ardiansyah, E., Saleh, M., & Rachman, R. (2022). Batasan Tanggungjawab Notaris terhadap Akta Autentik yang Dibuatnya. Recital Review, 4(2), 432–451. https://doi.org/10.22437/rr.v4i2.18867
Arliman, L. S. (2015). Notaris dan penegakan hukum oleh hakim. Deepublish.
Erliyani, R., & Hamdan, S. R. (2020). Akta notaris dalam pembuktian perkara perdata dan perkembangan cyber notary. Dialektika.
Erliyani, R. (2020). Metode penelitian dan penulisan hukum (Cetakan 1). Magnum Pustaka Utama. https://repo-dosen.ulm.ac.id/handle/123456789/17326
Faizal, H., & Indratirini, I. (2024). Kedudukan Notaris sebagai Mediator dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Kenotariatan. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Sosial (JUPENDIS), 2(2), 307–317. https://doi.org/10.54066/jupendis.v2i2.1659
Ghani, A. R., Firdaus, M., & Al Ansari, M. (2025). Peran Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta Otentik dan Dampaknya terhadap Keabsahan Hukum di Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory, 3(2), 1574–1582. https://doi.org/10.62976/ijijel.v3i2.1147
Ginting, Y. P., Arundati, A., Budianto, A. C., Londe, E. N., Melviana, Jursito, T. A., & Tang, V. G. (2023). Kompetensi Mediator dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Sebelum Melaksanakan Proses Persidangan. Jurnal Pengabdian West Science, 2(7), 541–557. https://doi.org/10.58812/jpws.v2i07.466
Ismoyo, J. D., Apriyanto, A., Harryanti, T., & Judijanto, L. (2025). Teori negara hukum modern. PT Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
Metak, L., Mochtar, D. A., & Wisnuwardhani, D. A. (2025). Menyoal Kedudukan Notaris sebagai Mediator dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Para Pihak terhadap Akta yang Dibuatnya. MLJ Merdeka Law Journal, 6(1), 50–59. https://jurnal.unmer.ac.id/index.php/mlj/article/view/15630
Muhaimin. (2020). Metode penelitian hukum. Mataram University Press. https://eprints.unram.ac.id/20305
Muhjad, H. (2018). Eksistensi notaris dalam dinamika hukum dan kebijakan. Genta Publishing.
Ningsih, D. A., Ginting, B., Suprayitno, S., & Nasution, F. A. (2022). Implementasi Fungsi Pejabat Publik yang Dapat Diemban oleh Notaris dalam Menjalankan Kewenangannya sebagai Pejabat Umum. Jurnal Notarius, 1(2), 173–181. https://jurnal.umsu.ac.id/index.php/notarius/article/view/13958
Rosita, R. (2017). Alternatif dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa: Litigasi dan Non Litigasi. Al-Bayyinah, 1(2), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.35673/al-bayyinah.v1i2.20
Sari, E. P. (2022). Penyelesaian Sengketa Kenotariatan melalui Upaya Mediasi oleh Notaris. Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia, 1(3), 944–952. https://doi.org/10.58344/jmi.v1i3.89
Sinaga, H., Timbul, J., & Pondang, J. (2024). Membedah mediasi sebagai alternatif penyelesaian sengketa. Mega Press Nusantara. https://megapress.co.id/product/membedah-mediasi-sebagai-alternatif-penyelesaian-sengketa
Sinaga, N. A. (2019). Implementasi Hak dan Kewajiban Para Pihak dalam Hukum Perjanjian. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, 10(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v10i1.400
Situngkir, D. A. (2023). Mengenal Teori Demokrasi dan Teori Kewenangan dalam Ilmu Hukum. Ensiklopedia of Journal, 5(4), 8–14. https://jurnal.ensiklopediaku.org/ojs-2.4.8-3/index.php/ensiklopedia/article/view/1745
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2007). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Sugianto, F., Simeon, F. C., & Wibowo, D. P. (2020). Idealisasi Sifat Alternatif dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa melalui Mediasi. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 3(2), 253–265. https://doi.org/10.30996/jhbbc.v3i2.3525
Yenny Febrianty. (2023). Keberadaan hukum kenotariatan di Indonesia. CV Green Publisher Indonesia.