Peran Majelis Kehormatan Notaris terhadap Pejabat Notaris yang Menggunakan Hak Ingkar dalam Menjaga Kerahasiaan Isi Akta The Role of the Notary Honorary Council in Relation to Notary Officials Who Exercise the Right of Refusal in Maintaining the Confidentiality of Deed Contents
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
3033-3055
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ahkam.v5i3.10881
Viewed: 0 times
Downloaded: 0 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Aditya Laras Sakti Sudarsono1*, Achmad Faishal2 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Although the notary’s right of refusal and the protection of deed confidentiality have received attention in various previous studies, studies that specifically discuss the role of the Notary Honorary Council in providing protection for notaries who exercise the right of refusal, as well as the limits of its use in legal examination processes, remain limited. This study aims to analyze the factors considered by the Notary Honorary Council in accepting or rejecting requests for approval to examine notaries by investigators, public prosecutors, or judges, as well as to analyze the existence and limits of the use of the notary’s right of refusal in legal examination processes. This study used a qualitative approach with a normative legal research design through a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials were obtained through literature study and were then analyzed descriptively-prescriptively by examining relevant laws and regulations, legal doctrines, and literature. The results showed that the Notary Honorary Council has a strategic role in providing legal protection for notaries through its authority to approve or reject requests for the summoning of notaries and the retrieval of notarial protocol documents by law enforcement officials. In exercising this authority, the Notary Honorary Council considers the urgency of the examination, the relevance of the deed to the case being examined, and the need for evidence in the judicial process. The results also showed that the notary’s right of refusal remains recognized as a consequence of the obligation to maintain the confidentiality of the office and the contents of deeds, but its use is not absolute because it is limited by statutory provisions and the interests of law enforcement through established mechanisms. This finding contributes to the development of notarial law studies, particularly regarding the relationship between the protection of notarial office confidentiality and the need for law enforcement in judicial proceedings. The conclusion of this study emphasizes that the use of the right of refusal must be applied proportionally by maintaining a balance between the protection of notarial office confidentiality and the interest of seeking truth in legal proceedings. The implications of this study include theoretical contributions to the development of the concept of legal protection for the notarial profession, as well as practical implications for the Notary Honorary Council, law enforcement officials, and policymakers in creating a notarial examination mechanism that ensures legal certainty and balanced professional protection.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Aisyiah, P. (2026). Kewenangan dan Peran Majelis Kehormatan Notaris dalam Upaya Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Proses Penegakan Hukum yang Melibatkan Notaris: Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 13/G/2018/PTUN-TPI. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v7i4.3505
Aman, S. S. (2025). Aspek hukum tentang hak dan kewajiban ingkar notaris. Penerbit Adab.
Andriani, H., Ericson, S. Y., Putra, E. P. M., & Prasetyo, D. D. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Notaris di Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia. Lex Stricta: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(2), 93–100.
Anggito, A., & Setiawan, J. (2018). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. CV Jejak.
Arben, A., & Utama, A. S. (2024). Kedudukan Akta Notaris sebagai Akta Autentik dalam Hukum Perdata Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris. ANDREW Law Journal, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.61876/alj.v3i1.26
Arief, A. N. R., Akub, S., & Muchtar, S. (2019). Persetujuan Majelis Kehormatan Notaris Wilayah dalam Pengambilan Minuta Akta dalam Proses Peradilan. Al-Adalah: Jurnal Hukum dan Politik Islam, 4(1), 52–81. https://doi.org/10.35673/ajmpi.v4i1.213
Candra, N. C. A., & Hoesin, S. H. (2025). Upaya Hukum Notaris dalam Menjalankan Kewajiban Ingkar sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Rahasia Jabatan. Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi, 13(3), 858–867. https://doi.org/10.36987/jiad.v13i3.6390
Chalid, M. R. I. (2022). Hambatan dan Prospek Hukum Penyelenggaraan Jasa Notaris secara Elektronik di Indonesia Memasuki Era Society 5.0. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 52(1), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol52.no1.3332
Ghuto, I. P., Ruslijanto, P. A., & Wardani, D. A. W. (2024). Implikasi Hukum bagi Notaris yang Menghindari Panggilan Penyidik. Jurnal USM Law Review, 7(2), 570–585. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i2.8981
Gotama, A., Nofrial, R., Fadlan, F., Respationo, S., & Erniyanti, E. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Notaris sebagai Pejabat Umum dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terkait Kewenangan Membuat Akta Otentik: Studi Penelitian di Kota Batam. UNES Law Review, 6(1), 3731–3742. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1172
H., P. K., & Dewi, R. I. (2025). Ruang Lingkup Hak Ingkar Notaris sebagai Salah Satu Kewajiban Notaris. Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 10(8), 6725–6739. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v10i8.61452
Laksana, P. A. (2016). Batas-Batas Kewajiban Menjaga Kerahasiaan Notaris dalam Kaitannya Hak Ingkar Notaris Berdasarkan Undang-Undang tentang Jabatan Notaris. Jurnal Akta, 3(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v3i4.2919
Mahendra, A. T., & Musyafah, A. A. (2023). Hak Ingkar Notaris dalam Kewajibannya Merahasiakan Akta. Gorontalo Law Review, 6(2), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.32662/golrev.v6i2.2741
Marjon, D. (2016). Aplikasi Kode Etik Hak Ingkar Notaris sebagai Saksi dalam Perkara Perdata dan Pidana. NOTARIIL Jurnal Kenotariatan, 1(1), 88–108. https://doi.org/10.22225/jn.1.1.109.88-108
Mezak, M. H. (2006). Jenis, metode dan pendekatan dalam penelitian hukum.
Muza, Y. N. (2024). Peran dan Akibat Hukum bagi Notaris terhadap Akta Autentik yang Dibuat [Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang]. https://repository.unissula.ac.id/35189
Permanasari, R., & Khisni, A. (2018). Imunitas Hukum bagi Notaris yang Membuka Rahasia Jabatan. Jurnal Akta, 5(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v5i1.2528
Prabawa, B. G. A. (2017). Analisis Yuridis tentang Hak Ingkar Notaris dalam Hal Pemeriksaan Menurut Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris dan Kode Etik Notaris. Acta Comitas: Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, 2(1), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2017.v02.i01.p09
Prasstumi, D. A. (2022). Kewajiban Notaris Menjaga Kerahasiaan Akta dalam Keterlibatannya di Peradilan. Jurnal Education and Development, 10(2), 211–216. https://journal.ipts.ac.id/index.php/ED/article/view/3586
Putri, K. M., Anwary, I., & Haiti, D. (2022). Kewajiban Notaris Melakukan Pembacaan dan Penandatanganan Akta di Depan Semua Pihak secara Bersama-Sama. Notary Law Journal, 1(2), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.32801/nolaj.v1i2.21
Rahman, E., & Perkasa, A. I. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Notaris dalam Menerapkan Prinsip Mengenali Pengguna Jasa. Jurnal Global Ilmiah, 2(9), 676–692. https://doi.org/10.55324/jgi.v2i9.224
Sari, E. J. (2022). Implementasi Hukum Hak Ingkar Notaris terhadap Kerahasiaan Isi Akta Notaris. Officium Notarium, 2(1), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.20885/JON.vol2.iss1.art8
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2015). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. Rajawali Press.
Syamsiah, I. N. (2026). Kekuatan Pembuktian Surat di Bawah Tangan dan Implikasinya terhadap Kepastian Hukum dalam Sengketa Perdata: Analisis Putusan No. 26/Pdt.G/2024/PN Mgg. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 4(1), 3235–3248. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v4i1.3662
Wibowo, W. S., Najwan, J., & Bakar, F. A. (2022). Integritas Notaris sebagai Pejabat Pembuat Akta Autentik dalam Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris. Recital Review, 4(2), 323–352. https://doi.org/10.22437/rr.v4i2.18861