Harmonisasi dan Eksekutif Review dalam Pengawasan dan Pembatalan Peraturan Kepala Daerah di Indonesia Harmonization and Executive Review in the Supervision and Annulment of Regional Head Regulations in Indonesia
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
2423-2438
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ahkam.v5i3.10461
Viewed: 34 times
Downloaded: 19 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Desip Trinanda1*, Wiana Perista2 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Institutional overlap and procedural inefficiency between the Ministry of Law and Human Rights and the Ministry of Home Affairs in the harmonization and supervision of regional regulations have implications for the emergence of legal uncertainty at the regional level. This study aims to analyze the juridical implications of the shift in authority over the harmonization of Draft Regional Head Regulations based on Law Number 13 of 2022, evaluate the dualism of executive regulatory review at the regional level, and formulate an ideal model of regulatory supervision within the framework of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia. This study used a normative juridical approach with a conceptual design and a statutory approach. Primary and secondary legal materials were collected through a literature study of relevant legislation and court decisions, then analyzed qualitatively through systematic and teleological interpretation. The results show that although executive review of Regional Regulations has been conditionally invalidated by the Constitutional Court, executive review of Regional Head Regulations remains constitutional as a form of hierarchical supervision within the realm of state administration or bestuur. However, the harmonization process conducted by the Ministry of Law and Human Rights, which runs in parallel with evaluation by the Ministry of Home Affairs, creates procedural inefficiency and an anomaly of pseudo-harmonization, especially when drafts are unilaterally amended after the harmonization process. The conclusion of this study emphasizes the importance of a clear demarcation line between the harmonization of formal-legality aspects by the Ministry of Law and Human Rights and the evaluation of policy-substance aspects by the Ministry of Home Affairs to ensure legal certainty. The theoretical contribution of this study lies in strengthening the governance of central–regional relations, while its practical implications take the form of recommendations for a sequential collaboration framework and the development of a nationally integrated one-stop digital supervision portal.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Amin, M., & Jamaluddin. (2025). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Produk Hukum Pemerintah Daerah Dalam Perspektif Prinsip Otonomi Daerah. Ahkam: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Humaniora, 4(4), 1448–1463. https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v4i4.7908
Androniceanu, A., & Georgescu, I. (2023). Public administration digitalization and government effectiveness in the EU countries. Central European Public Administration Review, 21(1), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2023.1.01
Asshiddiqie, J., & Syafa’at, M. A. (2012). Teori Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum. Konstitusi Press.
Baehaqi. (2018). Kewenangan Menteri Dalam Negeri Dalam Membatalkan Perda Provinsi dan Perda Kabupaten/Kota: Kajian Terhadap Putusan MK Nomor 56/PUU-XIV/2016. Dinamika Hukum, 9(1), 25–41. https://ejurnal.unisri.ac.id/index.php/Dinamika_Hukum/article/view/4279
Bo’a, F. Y. (2018). Pancasila Sebagai Sumber Hukum Dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional. Jurnal Konstitusi, 15(1), 21–49. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1512
Butt, S. (2010). Regional autonomy and legal disorder: The proliferation of local laws in Indonesia. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 1–21. https://law.nus.edu.sg/sjls/wp-content/uploads/sites/14/2024/07/2011-2010-sjls-jul-1.pdf
Butt, S., & Lindsey, T. (2018). Indonesian Law. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199677740.001.0001
Erdianti, N., & Kartika, A. W. (2025). Sentralisasi Kewenangan Executive Preview Pemerintah Pusat Terhadap Harmonisasi Rancangan Peraturan Kepala Daerah. Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum, 8(2), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v8i2.6441
Hartomo, W. T. (2018). Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 137/PUU-XIII/2015 dan Putusan Nomor 56/PUU-XIV/2016 Tentang Pembatalan Perda Provinsi, Perda Kabupaten/Kota, Peraturan Gubernur, dan Peraturan Bupati/Peraturan Walikota. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 15(2), 27–39.
Huda, N. (2008). UUD 1945 dan Gagasan Amandemen Ulang. Rajawali Pers.
Liany, L. (2019). Hapusnya Wewenang Executive Review Pemerintah Terhadap Peraturan Daerah: Studi Pasca-Adanya Putusan MK Nomor 137/PUU-XIII/2015 dan Nomor 56/PUU-XIV/2016. ADIL: Jurnal Hukum, 10(2), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.33476/ajl.v10i2.1222
Lule, A. (2021). Dualisme Pengujian Peraturan Daerah: Legitimasi Konstitusional dan Mengakhiri Ambivalensi Penyelesaian Hukum. CREPIDO, 3(2), 110–119. https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.3.2.110-119
Manan, B. (1994). Hubungan Antara Pusat dan Daerah Menurut UUD 1945. Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Kencana.
McKee, D. (2016). The standard of review for questions of procedural fairness. Queen’s Law Journal, 41(2), 355–408.
Munawaroh, N., & Hidayati, N. (2015). Integrasi Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Upaya Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 22(2), 255–268. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol22.iss2.art5
Muzayyin, A., Asmara, M. G., & Risnain, M. (2023). Kewenangan Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Nusa Tenggara Barat Dalam Pengharmonisasian Rancangan Peraturan Daerah Provinsi. Indonesia Berdaya, 4(3).
Pratiwi, I., Yuliandri, & Setiawan, D. B. (2024). Pengharmonisasian Pembulatan dan Pemantapan Konsepsi Ranperda dan Ranperkada oleh Kantor Wilayah Kemenkumham. UNES Journal of Swara Justisia, 7(4), 1167–1180. https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v7i4.415
Purnama, I. D., Dwiputri, N. Z., Setiadi, W., & Kaharuddin. (2024). Urgensi Penataan Ulang Mekanisme Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia: Analisis Normatif Terhadap Kewenangan Lembaga Yudikatif. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora, 3(2), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v3i2.5569
Sanjaya, H. A., & Widjaja, G. (2025). Harmonisasi Peraturan Daerah Terhadap Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Ditingkat Pusat. Jurnal Tana Mana, 6(1), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.33648/jtm.v6i1.515
Sihombing, E. N. (2017). Perkembangan Kewenangan Pembatalan Peraturan Daerah dan Peraturan Kepala Daerah: Kajian Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 137/PUU-XIII/2015 dan Nomor 56/PUU-XIV/2016. Jurnal Yudisial, 10(2), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v10i2.147
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2015). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Rajawali Pers.
Trinanda, D. (2022). Pembatalan Peraturan Kepala Daerah: Studi Permendagri Nomor 120 Tahun 2018. Ijtihad, 38(1), 15–26. https://journals.fasya.uinib.org/index.php/ijtihad/article/view/123
Varuhas, J. N. E. (2020). The principle of legality. Cambridge Law Journal, 79(3), 578–614. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197320000598