Urgensi Saksi dalam Permohonan Cerai Talak menurut Fiqih Munakahat (Studi Putusan Nomor: 450/PDT.G/2025/PA.LK Pengadilan Agama Tanjung Pati) The Urgency of Witnesses in Petitions for Talaq Divorce according to Islamic Marriage Jurisprudence (A Study of Decision Number: 450/PDT.G/2025/PA.LK of the Tanjung Pati Religious Court)

Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

Although studies on evidence in divorce cases have been widely conducted, research that specifically integrates judicial considerations with the perspective of fiqh munakahat regarding the urgency of witnesses in petitions for divorce by talak remains limited. This study aims to analyze judicial considerations regarding witness evidence in Decision Number 450/Pdt.G/2025/PA.LK of the Tanjung Pati Religious Court and to examine the urgency of witnesses from the perspective of fiqh munakahat. This study used a qualitative approach with a case study design. The research informants were selected through purposive sampling, including judges of the Tanjung Pati Religious Court who handled the related case. Data were collected through interviews, documentation, and observation, then analyzed using the interactive analysis model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña, which includes data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing. The results show that the petition for divorce by talak was rejected because the testimony submitted did not meet the required evidentiary strength, particularly because the witnesses did not have direct knowledge of the disputed events. This finding affirms that witnesses hold an important position in the evidentiary system of divorce by talak cases, both from the perspective of civil procedural law and fiqh munakahat. The conclusion of this study shows that the quality of testimony is a crucial aspect in realizing legal certainty and justice in the resolution of divorce cases. The implications of this study include theoretical contributions to the development of Islamic family law studies and practical implications for judges, academics, and the public in understanding the urgency of valid, relevant, and accountable witness evidence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Fajar H.F. (2026)
    The Urgency of Digital Transformation in Realizing Dignified General Elections
    Jurnal Konstitusi, 23(1), 112-147
  2. Saptono N. (2026)
    PEPPER, POWER, AND RESISTANCE: THE KERATUAN DARAH PUTIH AND GLOBAL TRADE NETWORKS IN SOUTH LAMPUNG (17TH–18TH CENTURY)
    Eminak, 53(1), 379-401
  3. Nasution T.H. (2026)
    Implementation of Speech Recognition and Face Detection in a Student Service Information System
    Proceedings 5th International Conference on Informatics and Software Engineering Iisec 2026, 272-276

Article Details

How to Cite
Putri, N. P., & Yenti, E. (2026). Urgensi Saksi dalam Permohonan Cerai Talak menurut Fiqih Munakahat (Studi Putusan Nomor: 450/PDT.G/2025/PA.LK Pengadilan Agama Tanjung Pati). AHKAM, 5(3), 3482-3494. https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v5i3.11148

References

Abdurrahman. (2007). Kompilasi Hukum Islam di Indonesia. Akademika Pressindo.

Ali, Z. (2022). Hukum Perdata Islam di Indonesia (Edisi revisi). Sinar Grafika.

Andriyaldi, A., Nisa, A., Afifi, A. A., & Hamdani, H. (2024). Mandatory conditions for witnesses in divorce in the perspective of Maqashid Syariah, considering the views of fuqaha and mufassir. AL-IMAM: Journal on Islamic Studies, Civilization and Learning Societies, 5(2), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.58764/j.im.2024.5.78

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). Statistik Indonesia 2024. https://www.bps.go.id/id/publication/2024/02/28/c1bacde03256343b2bf769b0/statistik-indonesia-2024.html

Bakry, K., Sirajuddin, S., Musriwan, M., & Mansyah, A. A. (2021). Tinjauan Fikih Islam terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Talak. BUSTANUL FUQAHA: Jurnal Bidang Hukum Islam, 2(2), 348–362. https://doi.org/10.36701/bustanul.v2i2.374

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Hanifah MR, S. (2023). Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menolak Permohonan Cerai Talak terhadap Persaksian Perspektif Hukum Islam: Studi Putusan Nomor 2798/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Kbm [Skripsi, UIN Prof. K. H. Saifuddin Zuhri]. https://repository.uinsaizu.ac.id/20167

Hikmatullah. (2021). Fiqh Munakahat: Pernikahan dalam Islam. Edu Pustaka.

Iman, R. Q., & Joni, J. (2024). Divorce and its practices before a religious court: A perspective analysis of Islamic legal. Al-Hurriyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 9(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.30983/alhurriyah.v9i1.8066

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2025). Laporan Tahunan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Tahun 2024. https://kepaniteraan.mahkamahagung.go.id/publikasi/laporan-tahunan/2542-laporan-tahunan-mahkamah-agung-tahun-2024

Maulana, A. (2010). Urgensi Saksi dalam Talak dan Rujuk Menurut KHI dan Fiqih: Sebuah Kajian Komparatif [Skripsi, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta]. https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/921

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Muna, A. K. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Putusan Hakim tentang Penolakan Perkara Cerai Talak: Studi Putusan Pengadilan Agama Kota Madiun Nomor 233/Pdt.G/2023/PA.MN [Skripsi, IAIN Ponorogo]. https://etheses.iainponorogo.ac.id/31472

Muzammil, I. (2019). Fiqh Munakahat: Hukum Pernikahan dalam Islam. Tira Smart. https://repository.uinsa.ac.id/id/eprint/1057/1/Iffah%20Muzammil_Fiqh%20Munakahat.pdf

Sugiyono. (2023). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (Edisi 3). Alfabeta.

Umar, U., Adly, M. A., & Firmansyah, H. (2025). Problematika Kesaksian Talak dalam Pengadilan Agama Menurut Fiqih Islam dan KHI. Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara, 3(1), 168–175. https://journal-stiayappimakassar.ac.id/index.php/Eksekusi/article/view/1724

Wahid, A. A. (2019). Kesaksian dalam Cerai Talak di Pengadilan Agama: Studi Komparasi antara Fiqih Madzhab Syi’ah dan Fiqih Madzhab Syafi’i [Skripsi, IAIN Jember]. https://digilib.uinkhas.ac.id/14048

Wijaya, B. (2018). Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menolak Permohonan Cerai Talak: Studi Putusan Pengadilan Agama Bukittinggi [Skripsi].

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Yunta, A. H. D., Anshor, S. B., & Paramata, M. A. E. (2023). Keabsahan Tafwīḍ Talak dalam Tinjauan Fikih Munākaḥāt: Studi Komparatif Pandangan Ibnu Qudamah dan Ibnu Hazm. BUSTANUL FUQAHA: Jurnal Bidang Hukum Islam, 4(3), 532–557. https://doi.org/10.36701/bustanul.v4i3.1206