Pengembangan Instrumen Identifikasi Diskalkulia Siswa Kelas VII di SMP Negeri 3 Bukittinggi Development of an Instrument for Identifying Dyscalculia in Grade VII Students at SMP Negeri 3 Bukittinggi

Main Article Content

Alfia Mayfa Carissa
Tasnim Rahmat

Abstract

Dyscalculia is a specific learning disorder in mathematics that can affect students’ ability to understand number concepts, perform arithmetic operations, and solve mathematical problems; however, the development of dyscalculia identification test instruments based on indicators of linguistic skills, perceptual skills, and attentional skills among junior secondary school students remains limited. This study aims to develop a dyscalculia identification test instrument that meets the criteria of validity, reliability, practicality, and effectiveness as a diagnostic assessment tool for seventh-grade junior secondary school students. This study used a Research and Development approach with the ADDIE development model, which includes the stages of Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation. The study involved expert validators, mathematics teachers, and 32 seventh-grade students of SMP Negeri 3 Bukittinggi selected using purposive sampling. Data were collected through validation sheets, tests, practicality questionnaires, interviews, and documentation, and were then analyzed using quantitative descriptive analysis, item quality analysis, and qualitative data analysis. The results show that the developed instrument has a validity level of 77% in the valid category, a reliability coefficient of 0.916 in the very high category, a practicality level of 78% in the very practical category, and is able to identify students who show indications of dyscalculia based on aspects of linguistic skills, perceptual skills, and attentional skills. The conclusion of this study emphasizes that the developed dyscalculia identification test instrument is suitable for use as an initial screening tool to support the early detection of mathematics learning disorders, enabling teachers to design more appropriate learning interventions according to students’ needs. These findings contribute to the development of diagnostic assessment in mathematics education by providing an instrument with good psychometric quality and offer practical implications for teachers and schools in optimizing learning services and diagnostic assessment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Scopus Citation Data

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Kumar A. (2027)
    Direct Technology Diffusion in Higher Education: Evidence from Doctoral Students
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(1), 79-92
  2. Petrukha N. (2027)
    Innovative and Digital Approaches in Higher Education for Student Motivation and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A Literature Review
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(1), 171-182
  3. Thinwiangthong S. (2027)
    Biology and Health Education Curriculum on Liver Fluke Disease and Cholangiocarcinoma Prevention among Primary School Students in Endemic Areas to Support Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Bibliometric and Mixed-Methods Needs Analysis
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(1), 127-152

Article Details

How to Cite
Carissa, A. M., & Rahmat, T. (2026). Pengembangan Instrumen Identifikasi Diskalkulia Siswa Kelas VII di SMP Negeri 3 Bukittinggi. YASIN, 6(4), 4774-4796. https://doi.org/10.58578/yasin.v6i4.11125

References

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association. https://www.testingstandards.net/uploads/7/6/6/4/76643089/standards_2014edition.pdf

American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.; DSM-5-TR). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787

Azwar, S. (2021). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi (3rd ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6

Butterworth, B. (2019). Dyscalculia: From science to education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315538112

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Devine, A., Soltész, F., Nobes, A., Goswami, U., & Szűcs, D. (2013). Gender differences in developmental dyscalculia depend on diagnostic criteria. Learning and Instruction, 27, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.02.004

Fuchs, L. S., Schumacher, R. F., Sterba, S. K., Long, J., Namkung, J., Malone, A., Hamlett, C. L., Jordan, N. C., & Changas, P. (2021). Does early mathematics intervention improve the mathematics achievement of students at risk for mathematics learning disabilities? Exceptional Children, 87(4), 437–456.

Geary, D. C. (2011). Consequences, characteristics, and causes of mathematical learning disabilities and persistent low achievement in mathematics. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 32(3), 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0b013e318209edef

Haberstroh, S., & Schulte-Körne, G. (2019). The diagnosis and treatment of dyscalculia. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 116(7), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2019.0107

Kaufmann, L., & von Aster, M. (2012). The diagnosis and management of dyscalculia. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 109(45), 767–778. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2012.0767

Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. (2022). Capaian Pembelajaran pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah pada Kurikulum Merdeka. Kemendikbudristek.

Mammarella, I. C., Caviola, S., Giofrè, D., & Szűcs, D. (2021). The cognitive foundations of developmental dyscalculia: Current evidence and future directions. Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 8(2), 65–74.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Molenda, M. (2015). In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Performance Improvement, 54(2), 40–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21461

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en

Peng, P., Wang, T., Wang, C., & Lin, X. (2022). A meta-analysis of mathematics interventions for students with mathematics learning disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 92(2), 147–184.

Peters, L., De Smedt, B., Torbeyns, J., Ghesquière, P., & Verschaffel, L. (2020). Developmental dyscalculia: Research advances and future directions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(5), 321–334.

Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2014). Design and development research: Methods, strategies, and issues. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203826034

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan (Research and Development/R&D). Alfabeta.


Explore Our Journals
Find the most suitable journal for your research. If this journal does not fully align with the scope of your manuscript, we invite you to explore our wider portfolio of journals covering diverse fields of study. Please select one of the journals below to identify the most appropriate publication platform for your work.