Intertextuality of God's Dialogue with the Prophet Moses in the Qur'an and the Torah: Analysis Perspective of Julia Kristeva
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines the intertextuality of God’s dialogue with Moses in the Qur’an and the Torah through Julia Kristeva’s perspective. The research is motivated by narrative similarities between divine dialogue accounts in the two sacred texts, which indicate intertextual relations and meaning transformation. This study aims to identify the forms of intertextual relations between God’s dialogue with Moses in the Qur’an and the Torah and to reveal the processes through which meaning is transformed within these narratives. A qualitative library research approach was employed by analyzing Qur’an 20:11–14, Qur’an 4:164, Qur’an 7:143, and selected Torah passages, namely Exodus 3:1–6, Exodus 3:14, and Numbers 12:8. The analysis was conducted using Kristeva’s concepts of genotext and phenotext, supported by the principles of parallelism, transformation, modification, haplology, and demythification. The findings indicate that the Qur’an has a close intertextual relationship with the Torah as a genotext, yet this relationship is transformational rather than reproductive. The Qur’an preserves the narrative pattern of divine dialogue while simplifying symbols, adapting meanings, and affirming monotheism and divine transcendence within an Islamic theological framework. This study contributes to Qur’anic studies and intertextual literary analysis by demonstrating how sacred-text narratives can be examined through Kristeva’s theory to clarify continuity, transformation, and theological reinterpretation across religious traditions.
Downloads
Article Details

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Affani, S. (2017). Rekonstruksi Kisah Nabi Musa dalam al-Quran: Studi Perbandingan dengan Perjanjian Lama. Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial, 12(1), 170–196. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-ihkam.v12i1.1259
Alfirdaus, R., AS, A. Q., & Sihabudin, M. (2025). A critical analysis of Al-Dzahabi’s critique on Al-Kasysyaf’s interpretation of QS an-Nisa’: 164. Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an, 21(2), 203–222. https://doi.org/10.21009/JSQ.21.2.4
Aminullah, A. A. M., & Al Farisi, M. Z. (2026). Dialog Profetik Nabi Musa dan Allah dalam Al-Qur’an Perspektif Teori Relevansi. Aphorisme: Journal of Arabic Language, Literature, and Education, 7(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.37680/aphorisme.v7i1.8981
Auliyah, K., Suwarno, S., Chasanah, U., & Ali, R. (2021). Student centered learning in Surah Thaha 17-18 and its implication in Islamic boarding school education. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal, 4(3), 4887–4899. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i3.2276
Christi, A., Putra, R. J., Koe, S., & Laut, L. (2025). Aku adalah Aku: Makna Nama Allah dalam Keluaran 3:1–15 dan dampaknya bagi identitas diri manusia modern. Excelsis Deo: Jurnal Teologi, Misiologi, dan Pendidikan, 9(2), 20–30. https://www.sttexcelsius.ac.id/e-journal/index.php/excelsisdeo/article/view/250
David, A., & Panjaitan, F. (2021). Studi Komparasi Konsep Jubata dan YHWH dalam Keluaran 3:14 sebagai Upaya Kontekstualisasi Berita Injil bagi Suku Dayak Kanayatn. Sanctum Domine: Jurnal Teologi, 10(2), 101–124. https://doi.org/10.46495/sdjt.v10i2.89
Elkana, S. (2021). Peran Malaikat Berdasarkan Kisah Para Rasul 12:5–12. REDOMINATE: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristiani, 3(1), 42–65. http://sttkerussoindonesia.ac.id/e-journal/index.php/redominate
Ervina, E., Nilasari, N. P., & Syafiq, M. (2025). Penerapan Metode Story Telling Islami untuk Meningkatkan Minat Belajar Siswa terhadap Materi Sejarah Nabi dalam Pendidikan Agama Islam. MUDABBIR: Journal Research and Education Studies, 5(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.56832/mudabbir.v5i2.1073
Fauzan, A., Wibowo, S. E., Muhsin, M., Rohmansyah, R., & Ismail, N. (2023). Javanese translation of Anâ Allâh: Study on the Javanese translation in QS. Thaha/20: 9–15. Khazanah: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora, 21(2), 189–208. https://jurnal.uin-antasari.ac.id/index.php/khazanah/article/view/9676
Firdausiyah, U. W. (2021). Kajian Semanalisis hingga Intertekstualitas Julia Kristeva: Analisis atas Teks Al-Quran tentang Eksistensi Hujan. Journal of Islamic Civilization, 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.33086/jic.v3i1.2006
Habibah, D. S., Syukron, A., & Ariyadi, S. (2025). Analisis Nilai-Nilai Qur’ani dalam Syair Tombo Ati: Pendekatan Penafsiran Intertekstualitas Julia Kristeva (L. 1941 M). AL-QIBLAH: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Bahasa Arab, 4(6), 713–736. https://doi.org/10.36701/al-qiblah.v4i6.2131
Ibn Kathīr, I. ibn ‘Umar. (n.d.). Tafsīr al-Qur’ān al-‘Aẓīm (2nd ed.). Dar Taibah li al-Nashr wa al-Tawzi.
Khaer, S. M., & Alfaruqi, S. (2025). Pemaknaan “Ana” dalam QS. Thaha Ayat 14 Analisis Semiotika Roland Barts. AL-Ghaaziy: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, 1(4), 1–18. https://jurnalinspirasimodern.com/index.php/AL-Ghaaziy/article/view/364
Khaidir, P. H. (2025). Metode Hermeneutika Qur’ani Integratif: Analisis Linguistik-Historis atas Tafsir Surat-Surat Makkiyah M. Quraish Shihab. Al-I’jaz: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an, Falsafah dan Keislaman, 7(2), 1–57. https://doi.org/10.53563/hq490w12
Kholid, M. A. (2025). Dialog Nabi Musa dengan Allah dan implementasinya pada generasi Z: Analisis QS Al-A’raf 143 perspektif Hermeneutika Gadamer [Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang]. http://etheses.uin-malang.ac.id/74871/
Limengka, P. E., Lim, B., & Santoso, A. (2023). Karakteristik Peribadahan Kristen Berdasarkan Pola Pernyataan-Respons dalam Keluaran 3:1–12. Didache: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristen, 4(2), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.55076/didache.v4i2.132
Muhammad, S., & Khan, N. A. (2020). Intertextual analysis of Quranic and biblical versions: A study of the Moses story. Hazaraislamicus, 9(2), 26–39. http://www.hazaraislamicus.com/
Naria, E., Khaidir, P. H., & Harmuzi, M. A. (2024). Analisis Dhikr sebagai Kesadaran Tauhid dalam Surah Thaha [20] Ayat 14: Perspektif Al-Tafsir Mafatih Al-Ghayb dan Semiotika Karl Buhler. Studia Quranika, 9(1), 125–144. https://quranika.journal.unida.gontor.ac.id/index.php/quranika/article/view/34
Nurmansyah, I., & Sofia, A. (2022). Paralel, Transformasi dan Haplologi Tafsir Tujuh Surah Karya Muhammad Basiuni Imran dengan Karya Tafsir Muhammad Rasyid Ridha: Kajian Intertekstualitas. Al-Bayan: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, 6(2), 66–82. https://doi.org/10.15575/al-bayan.v6i2.14685
Oddang, F., Muslimat, M., AJ, A. M., & Amir, S. A. (2018). Kematian Anda yang Tak Sia-Sia. Diva Press.
Purnama, R. F., & Sopyan, I. (2021). Kisah Nabi Yusuf dalam Al-Qur’an dan Alkitab: Suatu Pendekatan Intertekstual Julia Kristeva. Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an, 17(2), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.21009/JSQ.017.2.06
Rahmawati, S. T. (2021). Kecerdasan Verbal dalam Perspektif Al-Qur’an. Institut PTIQ Jakarta.
Saputra, A. M., & Firismanda, M. A. H. (2025). Intertekstualitas Novel Jakarta Sebelum Pagi Karya Ziggy Zezsyazeoviennazabrizkie dengan Karya Sastra Barat: Kajian Post-Strukturalis Julia Kristeva. Edukasi Lingua Sastra, 23(1), 1–17. https://jurnal.umko.ac.id/index.php/elsa/article/view/1628
Sarjono, M. (2025). Makna Frasa “Malaikat Tuhan” dalam Pembuktian Eksistensi Yesus di Perjanjian Lama menurut Keluaran 3:2–14: Studi Eksegesis. Excelsis Deo: Jurnal Teologi, Misiologi, dan Pendidikan, 9(1), 82–96. http://e-journal.sttexcelsius.ac.id/index.php/excelsisdeo/article/view/229
Sintia, E., & Taufiq, M. (2025). Perjanjian Allah dengan Bani Israel di Gunung Sinai: Studi Komparasi antara Al-Qur’an dan Alkitab. JUTEQ: Jurnal Teologi & Tafsir, 2(1), 157–168. https://languar.net/index.php/JUTEQ/article/view/16
Tubagus, M. T. S. T. (2025). Simbolisme Laut pada Kisah Musa dalam Al-Quran dan Tanakh: Teori Intertekstual Julia Kristeva. Amsal Al-Qur’an: Jurnal Al-Qur’an dan Hadis, 2(2), 296–308. https://doi.org/10.63424/amsal.v2i2.366
















Google Scholar




