Rekonstruksi Pemikiran Pendidikan Islam Tokoh Klasik dan Modern sebagai Landasan Pengembangan Pendidikan Islam di Indonesia Reconstruction of Islamic Educational Thought of Classical and Modern Figures as a Foundation for the Development of Islamic Education in Indonesia
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
3965-3980
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/tsaqofah.v6i4.10904
Viewed: 60 times
Downloaded: 22 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:Irsyad Mahardi Harnandika1*, Ida Wahyu Erlina2, Hidayat Hidayat3, Mulyanto Abdullah Khoir4
Copyright :Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
The development of Islamic education in Indonesia faces the challenges of social change, technological advancement, globalization, and the need to strengthen Islamic identity that is relevant to the contemporary context. This condition indicates the need to reconstruct Islamic educational thought rooted in the intellectual heritage of classical and modern figures as a basis for developing an adaptive and sustainable Islamic education system. This study aims to analyze, compare, and reconstruct the Islamic educational thought of classical and modern figures to formulate a conceptual framework for the development of Islamic education in Indonesia. This study employed a qualitative approach with a literature study or library research method. Data were obtained from primary literature in the form of works by classical and modern Islamic education figures as well as relevant secondary literature. The data were analyzed using content analysis, comparative analysis, and conceptual synthesis techniques. The results show that the thought of classical figures emphasizes the integration of knowledge, character formation, spiritual development, and a harmonious relationship between knowledge and practice. Meanwhile, the thought of modern figures emphasizes curriculum reform, the strengthening of critical thinking, the integration of religious knowledge and modern science, learning innovation, and responses to social change. The reconstruction of these two paradigms produces an integrative, transformative, humanistic, and contextual model of Islamic education as a foundation for the development of Islamic education in Indonesia. The conclusion of this study emphasizes the importance of integrating classical and modern values in building a paradigm of Islamic education that is responsive to the challenges of the 21st century. The implications of the study include theoretical contributions to strengthening the paradigm of Islamic education and practical implications for curriculum development, improving educator competence, learning innovation, and formulating adaptive and sustainable Islamic education policies.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles
-
Kumar A. (2027)Direct Technology Diffusion in Higher Education: Evidence from Doctoral StudentsAsean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(1), 79-92
-
Irawati R. (2027)Enhancing accounting students’ writing performance through problem-based learning: Evidence from a vocational higher education contextMultidisciplinary Science Journal, 9(1)
-
A.g S. (2027)Polymer-bitumen compositions for improving the energy efficiency of road constructionKompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 341(2), 97-104
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Açıkgenç, A. (2014). Islamic scientific tradition in history. ISTAC.
Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1991). The concept of education in Islam: A framework for an Islamic philosophy of education. ISTAC.
Al-Faruqi, I. R. (1982). Islamization of knowledge: General principles and work plan. International Institute of Islamic Thought.
Al-Ghazali. (2013). Ihya’ ‘Ulum al-Din. Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Al-Zarnuji. (2003). Ta‘lim al-Muta‘allim Tariq al-Ta‘allum. Dar Ibn Kathir.
Ashraf, S. A. (1985). New horizons in Muslim education. The Islamic Academy.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
Halstead, J. M. (2004). An Islamic concept of education. Comparative Education, 40(4), 517–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305006042000284510
Hashim, R. (2014). Educational dualism in Malaysia: Implications for theory and practice. Oxford University Press.
Ibn Khaldun. (1967). The Muqaddimah: An introduction to history (F. Rosenthal, Trans.). Princeton University Press.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Rahman, F. (1982). Islam and modernity: Transformation of an intellectual tradition. University of Chicago Press.
Sahin, A. (2018). Critical issues in Islamic education studies: Rethinking Islamic and Western liberal secular values of education. Religions, 9(11), Article 335. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel9110335
Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. SAGE Publications.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
Zed, M. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.