Assessing Differences in Student Motivation, Achievement, and Conceptual Understanding in a Gamified Mathematics Learning Environment

Main Article Content

Hassan Muhammad
Nura AY Musa
Sadik Hamagam
Usman Garba

Abstract

Although gamified learning has received growing attention in mathematics education, empirical evidence on its simultaneous influence on students’ motivation, mathematics achievement, and conceptual understanding in developing educational contexts remains limited. This study examined differences in students’ motivation, mathematics achievement, and conceptual understanding associated with participation in a gamified mathematics learning environment. A quasi-experimental pretest–posttest control group design was employed, involving 700 secondary school students from 15 public schools in Northeast Nigeria. Using intact classes, students were assigned to an experimental group that received curriculum-aligned gamified mathematics instruction over a four-week period or to a control group that received conventional instruction covering the same content and duration. Data were collected using pretest and posttest measures of student motivation, mathematics achievement, and conceptual understanding. Motivation was assessed using an adapted questionnaire with established internal consistency, while achievement and conceptual understanding were measured using curriculum-aligned assessments validated through expert review. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, paired-sample t-tests, and effect size estimates. The results showed statistically significant pretest–posttest gains in motivation, achievement, and conceptual understanding among students in the gamified instruction group, with moderate to large effect sizes, whereas students in the control group demonstrated minimal changes across the same measures. These findings indicate that curriculum-aligned gamified mathematics instruction is associated with enhanced student motivation, improved academic performance, and stronger conceptual understanding within the study context. The study contributes to mathematics education literature by providing large-sample quasi-experimental evidence on the concurrent affective and cognitive outcomes of gamified instruction in secondary mathematics classrooms in a developing educational setting.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Scopus Citation Data

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Shiryazdi R.S. (2027)
    Assessing performances of pattern informatics method variants: a comparative analysis in Zagros, Iran
    Iranian Journal of Geophysics, 20(3), 65-80
  2. Panigrahi S.K. (2027)
    BIOLOGY, ECOLOGY, AND VECTOR POTENTIAL OF FOUR SPECIES OF AEDES
    Indian Journal of Entomology, 89(1), 96-102
  3. Sangma A.A. (2027)
    Evaluation of plant-based mountage structures on cocoon traits of Antheraea assamensis
    Indian Journal of Entomology, 89(1), 183-186

Article Details

How to Cite
Muhammad, H., Musa, N. A., Hamagam, S., & Garba, U. (2026). Assessing Differences in Student Motivation, Achievement, and Conceptual Understanding in a Gamified Mathematics Learning Environment. International Journal of Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences, 4(2), 401-419. https://doi.org/10.58578/ijhess.v4i2.9364

References

Alkhawalde, M. A., & Khasawneh, S. A. (2023). The effect of gamification on students’ motivation and achievement in mathematics. International Journal of Instruction, 16(1), 345–362.

Castillo, A. R., Molina, J. A., & Torres, M. L. (2025). Gamification and conceptual understanding in secondary mathematics education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 73(1), 221–239.

Debrenti, E. (2024). Gamified task design and mathematics achievement in secondary education. Computers & Education, 201, Article 104819.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Fosnot, C. T. (2013). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. Teachers College Press.

Gruber, M., & Faßbender, P. (2025). Gamification in mathematics classrooms: Effects on motivation and learning processes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(1), 89–104.

Hui, K. L., & Mahmud, R. (2023). Measuring conceptual understanding in gamified learning environments. Computers & Education, 195, Article 104700.

Li, Y., Huang, Z., & Chen, X. (2024). Gamified learning environments and student outcomes in mathematics education: A meta-analytical review. Educational Psychology Review, 36(2), 345–371.

Ratinho, E., & Martins, C. (2023). The role of gamified learning strategies in student’s motivation in high school and higher education: A systematic review. Heliyon, 9(8), Article e19033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19033

Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015

Zainuddin, Z., Chu, S. K. W., Shujahat, M., & Perera, C. J. (2020). The impact of gamification on learning and instruction: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Educational Research Review, 30, Article 100326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100326


Explore Our Journals
Find the most suitable journal for your research. If this journal does not fully align with the scope of your manuscript, we invite you to explore our wider portfolio of journals covering diverse fields of study. Please select one of the journals below to identify the most appropriate publication platform for your work.

Most read articles by the same author(s)