Ability Performance Misalignment in WAEC Mathematics Examination Outcomes: A Quantitative Explanatory Study in North-East Nigeria
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
470-490
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ijecs.v4i3.9374
Viewed: 0 times
Downloaded: 0 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Hassan Muhammad1*, Sadik Hamagam2, Angel Otse Ogbu3 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study investigates ability–performance misalignment in West African Examinations Council (WAEC) Mathematics examination outcomes in northeastern Nigeria. A quantitative explanatory cross-sectional design was employed using archival data from public senior secondary schools to examine discrepancies between classroom-based achievement and performance in a high-stakes external examination. The findings revealed that a substantial proportion of students exhibited ability–performance misalignment: some students with high classroom performance obtained low scores in the WAEC Mathematics examination, whereas some students with low classroom performance achieved comparatively high examination scores. Test anxiety, self-efficacy, and inconsistent assessment practices significantly contributed to this misalignment. These findings suggest that WAEC Mathematics examination results may not always accurately represent students’ mathematical achievement and highlight the need to reconsider how high-stakes assessment outcomes are interpreted and used in educational decision-making. The study contributes to the assessment literature by emphasizing the importance of integrating affective, instructional, and contextual factors when evaluating student performance and formulating assessment policies.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Abbas, A., Ashwin, P., & McLean, M. (2013). Qualitative life-grids: A proposed method for comparative European educational research. European Educational Research Journal, 12(3), 320–329. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2013.12.3.320
Almarzouki, A. F. (2024). Stress, working memory, and academic performance: A neuroscience perspective. Stress, 27(1), Article 2364333. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253890.2024.2364333
Amrein, A. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2002). An analysis of some unintended and negative consequences of high-stakes testing. Education Policy Research Unit, Education Policy Studies Laboratory, Arizona State University. https://nepc.colorado.edu/files/EPSL-0211-125-EPRU.pdf
Asamoah, D., Shahrill, M., & Latif, S. N. A. (2024). Teachers’ perceptions of school assessment climate and realities of assessment practices in two educational contexts. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1278187. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1278187
Bandara, W., Furtmueller, E., Gorbacheva, E., Miskon, S., & Beekhuyzen, J. (2015). Achieving rigor in literature reviews: Insights from qualitative data analysis and tool-support. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37, 154–204. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03708
Bekoe, S. O. (2023). Towards a theory: The constraining hold of high-stakes external assessment on curriculum implementation. Creative Education, 14(5), 993–1008. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2023.145063
Çevikbaş, M., Kaiser, G., & Schukajlow, S. (2024). Trends in mathematics education and insights from a meta-review and bibliometric analysis of review studies. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 56(2), 165–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01587-7
Dogbey, J., & Dogbey, J. (2018). Depth of knowledge and context characteristics of the West African Examination Council’s Core Mathematics assessment—The case of Ghana from 1993–2013. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(4), 376–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1192524
Federal Ministry of Education. (2014). National policy on education (6th ed.). Nigerian Educational Research and Development Council. https://education.gov.ng/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/NATIONAL-POLICY-ON-EDUCATION.pdf
Folson, D., & Awush, F. K. (2024). Assessing cognitive alignment in pre-tertiary TVET core mathematics: A Ghanaian case study of curriculum and exit examination [Preprint]. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5711559/v1
Gellisch, M., Bablok, M., Brand-Saberi, B., & Schäfer, T. (2024). Neurobiological stress markers in educational research: A systematic review of physiological insights in health science education. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 37, Article 100242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2024.100242
Gopal, D., & Mofolo-Mbokane, B. (2021). Application of Webb’s depth of knowledge in mathematics assessment.
Haudek, K. C., & Zhai, X. (2024). Examining the effect of assessment construct characteristics on machine learning scoring of scientific argumentation. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 34(4), 1482–1509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00385-8
Heissel, J. A., Levy, D. J., & Adam, E. K. (2019). Stress, poverty, and academic performance. Journal of Public Economics, 170, 1–17.
International Commission on the Futures of Education. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707
Kaiser, G., & Presmeg, N. (2019). Competing perspectives on mathematics education. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 51(1), 1–7.
Osei-Asibey, E. (2024). Correlates of Ghanaian teachers’ understanding of mathematics strands and cognitive domains in Basic Education Certificate Examination. Asian Research Journal of Mathematics, 20(6), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.9734/arjom/2024/v20i6806
Pamungkas, M. D., Waluya, S. B., Mariani, S., & Isnarto. (2023). A systematic review of complex problem-solving in education and mathematics education. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 23(16), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v23i16.6465
Parrish, C. W., & Bryd, K. O. (2022). Cognitively demanding tasks: Supporting students and teachers during engagement and implementation. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(1), Article em0671. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11475
Prediger, S., Götze, D., Holzäpfel, L., Rösken-Winter, B., & Selter, C. (2022). Five principles for high-quality mathematics teaching: Combining normative, epistemological, empirical, and pragmatic perspectives for specifying the content of professional development. Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 969212. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.969212
Prokofieva, V., Kostromina, S., Polevaia, S., & Fenouillet, F. (2019). Understanding emotion-related processes in classroom activities through functional measurements. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2263. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02263
Qetrani, S., & Achtaich, N. (2022). Evaluation of procedural and conceptual knowledge of mathematical functions: A case study from Morocco. Journal on Mathematics Education, 13(2), 211–238. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v13i2.pp211-238
Rafi, I., Retnawati, H., Apino, E., Hadiana, D., Lydiati, I., & Rosyada, M. N. (2023). What might be frequently overlooked is actually still beneficial: Learning from post national-standardized school examination. Pedagogical Research, 8(1), Article em0145. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/12657
Ravand, H., Shahi, R., Effatpanah, F., & Moghadamzadeh, A. (2025). Measuring cognitive levels in high-stakes testing: A CDM analysis of a university entrance examination using Bloom’s taxonomy. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1644811. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1644811
Rosli, R., Goldsby, D., & Capraro, M. M. (2013). Assessing students’ mathematical problem-solving and problem-posing skills. Asian Social Science, 9(16), 54–60. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n16p54
Saikang, T., Junpeng, P., Luanganggoon, N., Chiajunthuk, S., Suwannatrai, P., Marwiang, M., Tang, K. N., & Wilson, M. (2024). Developing and validating the construct maps to assess mathematical proficiencies. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 13(2), 968–978. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i2.24871
Schmidt, M. M. (2022). Cognitive demand of teacher-created mathematics assessments [Master’s thesis, Boise State University]. https://doi.org/10.18122/td.1995.boisestate
West African Examinations Council. (2023). Chief examiners’ report on the West African Senior School Certificate Examination: Mathematics. https://waecgh.org/chief-examiners-report/
Yang, L., & Jamaludin, A. (2024). Test anxiety and academic performance in high-stakes examinations. Frontiers in Psychology, 15.
Zana, F. M., Sa’dijah, C., & Susiswo. (2024). The cognitive alignment of mathematics teachers’ assessments and its curriculum. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 13(3), 1561–1575. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i3.26814