Border Protection Task Force and Soft Power Defense Diplomacy in the Oecusse Border Dispute
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
1001-1017
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ijecs.v3i3.7565
Viewed: 262 times
Downloaded: 144 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:Mallini Anthonia Nahadin1*, Anak Agung Banyu Perwita2, Yermia Hendarwoto3
Copyright :Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Google Scholar
ORCID
Abstract
This study addresses a notable gap in the literature concerning the intersection of defense diplomacy and post-colonial border governance, with a specific focus on Indonesia and Timor-Leste’s Oecusse enclave. Despite the region’s strategic relevance and humanitarian sensitivities, limited scholarly attention has been given to the soft power dimensions of military engagement in this context. The research aims to analyze how Indonesia’s Border Protection Task Force (Satgas Pamtas) operationalizes soft power-driven defense diplomacy to manage low-intensity border frictions and sustain stability in Oecusse. Utilizing a qualitative case study approach, data were collected through document analysis, policy reports, and expert interviews with thirty purposively selected respondents. Thematic and pattern-matching analysis was applied to identify recurring mechanisms of cooperation and confidence-building. Findings indicate that Indonesia’s defense diplomacy manifested through joint patrols, humanitarian outreach, and cross-border community engagement serves as a non-coercive strategy for conflict prevention and mutual trust enhancement. These practices underscore the evolving role of military institutions as diplomatic actors in regional security governance. The study affirms the theoretical link between soft power and border management, illustrating how defense initiatives can contribute to peacebuilding without escalating tensions. It concludes that institutionalizing localized confidence-building measures, promoting civilian involvement, and integrating traditional adat structures into formal bilateral mechanisms are crucial for achieving sustainable peace. The study further recommends future comparative research on border diplomacy across Southeast Asia to refine the hybrid defense diplomacy model presented.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Aprila, D., Andriani, W., & Ananto, R. P. (2023). Financial Management of Nagari Owned Enterprises (BUMNAG) and Its Impact on Community Welfare. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 16(2), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.30813/jab.v16i2.4461
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.
Dachi, E. T., Yurianto, M., & Purwanto, P. (2023). The Indo-Pacific Context : Maritime Security Challenges And Diplomacy Of Asean Countries. International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS), 2(6), 1872–1881. https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v2i6.509
Djuyandi, Y., Mustofa, M. U., & Husin, L. H. (2024). National defense in the resolution of border disputes: the experience of Indonesia and Malaysia. Juridicas CUC, 20(1), 77–98. https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.20.1.2024.03
Elyta, E. (2022). Soft Power Model To Strengthen Human Security At the Temajuk Border. Sosiohumaniora, 24(2), 227. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v24i2.38505
Gumay, R. N. S., Octavian, A., & Swastanto, Y. (2018). Defense Diplomacy Implementation: the Synergy of Indonesia and Australia in Dealing With Illegal Immigrants in the Sea Border. Jurnal Pertahanan & Bela Negara, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.33172/jpbh.v8i1.278
Kennedy, P. S. J., Tobing, S. J. L., Heatubun, A. B., & Lumbantoruan, R. (2021). The Maritime Border Management of Indonesia and Timor Leste: By Military Approach or Welfare Approach? Acir 2018, 348–354. https://doi.org/10.5220/0010277003480354
Khan, S., & Qureshi, S. (2024). Diplomacy in Crisis: The Role of Mediation in Resolving Cross Border Conflicts. Journal of International Relations and Conflict, 1(December), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.29189.05606
Kumari, M. (2023). The Role of Soft Power in Contemporary Diplomacy. International Journal of Political Science and Governance, 4(4), 3119–3130. https://doi.org/10.33545/26646021.2025.v7.i5c.542
Leginosuko, T., Pedrason, R., Sumarlan, S., Sudibyo, S., & Halkis, M. (2021a). Reorientation of Indonesian Defense Diplomacy for Security Stability in the South China Sea. ISSN 2719-6410 Political Science and Security Studies Journal, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5764901
Leginosuko, T., Pedrason, R., Sumarlan, S., Sudibyo, S., & Halkis, M. (2021b). Reorientation of Indonesian Defense Diplomacy for Security Stability in the South China Sea. Political Science and Security Studies Journal, 2(4), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5764901
Mamentu, M., Rares, J. J., & Lond, V. Y. (2024). Indonesian Foreign Policy in Encouraging the Acceleration of Implementation of the ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 12(1), e2776. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v12i1.2776
Muni, J. (2018). Decentralization of State Border Governance: Relevances of Decentralization and Synergy of Border Governance (Case Study: Oecusse-Timor Leste - North Central Timor/Kupang Land Border - NTT - Indonesia). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 191(1), 313–320. https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/25896123.pdf
Nathan, K. S. (2023). ASEAN and the Major Powers in the South China Sea: the Role of Law, Diplomacy, and Deterrence in Moderating Sovereignty Claims. Philippine Political Science Journal, 44, 215–241. https://doi.org/10.1163/2165025x-bja10050
Rahmadhani, P., Apriwan, A., & Setyaka, V. (2023). Perubahan Kebijakan Luar Negeri Amerika Serikat dalam Mengatasi Imigran Ilegal di Perbatasan dengan Meksiko. POLITICS, HUMANITIES, LAWS, INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND SOCIAL Journal, 2(2), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.25077/palito.2.2.39-53.2023
Saputra, D. E., Perwita, A. A. B., & Hendarwoto, Y. (2025). ASEAN Defense Diplomacy: Navigating US Tariffs and South China Sea Tensions. International Journal of Education, Management, and Technology, 3(2), 655–671. https://doi.org/10.58578/ijemt.v3i2.7054
Scott, D. (2019). Indonesia Grapples with the Indo-Pacific: Outreach, Strategic Discourse, and Diplomacy. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 38(2), 194–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1868103419860669
Sugiyono. (2024). Metode Penelitian Kuantitati, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suminar, S. H., Perwita, A. A. B., & Ramsi, O. (2025). Hedging through Defence Diplomacy: Indonesia’s Non-Alignment in the Age of Emerging Technologies. Asian Journal of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Art, 3(4), 1340–1355. https://doi.org/10.58578/ajstea.v3i4.7112
Susilo, H., Rijanta, R., & Zubaidi, A. (2024). Protracted Unresolved Segment of Indonesia-Timor Leste Land Boundary in Noel Besi – Citrana Region. Geopolitics Quarterly, 20(2), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.22034/igq.2024.184550
Yahya, Y., Widjayanto, J., & Hendra, A. (2024). National Security Threats in the Indonesian Border Areas with Timor Leste. Indonesian Journal of Applied and Industrial Sciences (ESA), 3(2), 209–218. https://doi.org/10.55927/esa.v3i2.8494
Zulkifli, A., Wibisono, M., Perwita, A. A. B., & Mahroza, J. (2023). Foreign Policy and Defense Diplomacy in ASEAN to Maintain Stability and Security in the Indo-Pasific Region. Jurnal Pemikiran Administrasi Negara, 15(1), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpan.v15i1.25091