Penolakan Hadis Ahad: Dari Mu'tazilah dan Jahmiyah hingga Tokoh Modern The Rejection of Ahad Hadith: From Mu'tazilah and Jahmiyah to Modern Figures

Main Article Content

Muhamad Chaedar Rafiq
Engkos Kosasih
Muhammad Almighwar
Faiz Abdullah
Irfan Fadllurrahman

Abstract

This study examines the crucial role of Hadith Ahad in Islamic teachings, both in matters of faith (aqidah) and other aspects. If Hadith Ahad cannot be used as a proof (hujjah), many Islamic teachings understood and believed by the majority of Muslims would be displaced. This consequence highlights the importance of understanding and accepting the authority of Hadith Ahad in maintaining the continuity and integrity of Islamic teachings. Rejection of Hadith Ahad would have a broad impact on the understanding and beliefs of the Muslim community. The Mu’tazilah and Jahmiyah are groups that understand religious sources by prioritizing reason, which naturally leads to differences with other groups. This study covers the definition of Hadith Ahad and its authority, the Mu’tazilah and Jahmiyah sects' rejection of Hadith Ahad, and discusses the modern scholars' rejection of Hadith Ahad, especially in the establishment of faith (aqidah).

Keywords:
Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus



Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Scopus Citation Data

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Faizin A. (2026)
    Nationalizing Sharia: Challenging the Hegemony of Ahad Hadith and the Politics of Legal Codification in Saudi Arabia
    Al Istinbath Jurnal Hukum Islam, 11(1), 388-410
  2. Afsharzada M.S. (2026)
    Brief repetitive thinking questionnaire (RTQ-10): In a sample of Afghan students
    Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy, 36(4)
  3. Chesky K. (2026)
    Understanding the Health and Social Determinants of Health Needs of Resettled Afghan Refugees in Houston, Texas
    Community Health Equity Research and Policy, 46(4), 433-443

Article Details

How to Cite
Rafiq, M. C., Kosasih, E., Almighwar, M., Abdullah, F., & Fadllurrahman, I. (2024). Penolakan Hadis Ahad: Dari Mu’tazilah dan Jahmiyah hingga Tokoh Modern. Asian Journal of Islamic Studies and Da’wah, 2(4), 416-430. https://doi.org/10.58578/ajisd.v2i4.3247

References

Abd al-Muhdi ‘Abd al-Qadir. (2010). Daf’u al- Shubhat ‘An al-Hadith al-Nabawi. Maktabah Al Imam.
Abu Bakar Ahmad bin ‘Ali bin Thabit al_Khatib al-Baghdadi. (1988). al-Kifayah fi ‘Ilm al-Riwayah. Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyah.
Abu Lubabah Husain. (2003). Mauqif al-Mu’tazilah min al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyah, terj. Usman Sy’roni. Pustaka Firdaus.
Abu Rayyah. (n.d.). Adwa ’Ala a’-Sunnajh. Dar al- Ma’arif.
Ahmad Amin. (1975). Fajr al-Islam (Cet ke-2). Maktabah al-Nahdat al-Misriyyah.
Al-Asadabadi, A. al-jabbar bin A. (1965). Syarh Usul al-Khamsah. Maktabah Wahbah.
Al-Ramahhurmuziy, H. ibn A. al-R. (1984). Muhaddis al-Fasil bayn al-Rawiy wa al-Wa’iy. Dar Al-Fikr.
Bin, A., & Al-Fayyumy, M. (n.d.). Al-Misbah al-Munir fi Garib al-Syarh al-Kabir, juz II. Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyah.
Hatta, M. (2013). Aliran Mu’tazilah dalam Lintasan Sejarah Pemikiran Islam. Ilmu Ushuluddin, 1.
Husain, A. L. (1979). Mauqif Al-Mutazilah min Sunnah An-Nabawiyyah. Dar Liwa Li Nasyr wa Tauzi.
Liddini, L. (2020). Hadis Dalam Kacamata Mu’tazilah: Studi Tentang Al-Qadhi Abdul Jabar dan Abu Al Husain Al Bisri. Khuluqqirya:Jurnal Kajian Hukum Studi Islam, 2 (2), 58–78.
M. Syuhudi Ismail. (1988). Kaedah Kesahihan Sanad Hadis Telaah Kritis dan Tinjauan dengan Pendekatan Ilmu Sejarah. Bulan Bintang.
Mahmud Abu Rayyah. (n.d.). Adwa ‘Ala’ al-Sunnah al-Muhammadiyah aw Difa’ an Hadis. Dar al- Ma’arif.
Mahmud Al-Thahan. (n.d.). Taisiru Musthalahil Hadits (cet ke 11). Maktabah Al Ma’arif.
Manna’ Al-Qathan. (n.d.). Mabahits fi Ulumil Hadits (cet ke 2). Maktabah Wahbah.
Muhammad al-Ghazali. (2005). Al-Sunnah al- Nabawiyah baina Ahl al-Fiqh wa Ahl al-Hadith. Dar al-Shuruq.
Muhammad bin Ali al-Shaukan. (2000). Muhammad bin Ali al-Shaukani, Irshad al_Fuhul ila Tahqiq al-Haq min ‘Ilm al-Usul (Riyad}: Dar al_Fadilah, 2000), 39. Dar al - Fadilah.
Muhammad bin Idris al-Syafi’i. (n.d.). al-Risalah. Mustafa al-Halabi.
Muhammad bin Sa’id Raslan. (1436). Diraasaatun fil Bid’ati wal Mubtadi’in. Daarul Minhaj.
Muhammad Hamid al-Nashr. (2024). al-Asraniyyun bayn Maza’im al-Tajdid wa mayadin al- Taghrib, Terj, Abu Umar Bashir. Darul Haq.
Muhammad Husain Haikal. (1968). Hayat Muhammad. Maktabah al-Nahdat al-Misriyyah.
Muhammad Musthafa al-Azhami. (2006). Hadis Nabi dan Sejarah Kodifikasinya, terj. Ali Mustafa Yaqub. Pustaka Firdaus.
Muhammad Nasiruddin al-Albani. (1987). al-Hadith Hujjah bi Nafsihi fi al-‘Aqaid wa al-Ahkam. Dar al-Salafiyyah.
Mustafa Al-Siba’iy. (1985). Al-Sunnah wa Makanatuha fi al-Tasyri’ al-Islamy. Maktabah al-Islamiyah.
Mustafa Al-Siba’iy. (2000). al-Sunnah wa Makanatuha fi al_Tashri’i al-Islami. Dar El Waraq.
Rahman, F. (1995). Ihtisar Musthalahul Hadis. Al-Ma‘arif.
Salim Al-alBahanasawi. (1992). al-Sunnah al-Muftara’ Alaiha. Dar al-Basair al-Islamiyah.
Shaltut, M. (2001). al Islam Aqidah wa Shari’ah. Dar sl-Shuruq.
Ya’qub, A. M. (2008). Kritik Hadis (Cet ke-5). Pustaka Firdaus.

Explore Our Journals
Find the most suitable journal for your research. If this journal does not fully align with the scope of your manuscript, we invite you to explore our wider portfolio of journals covering diverse fields of study. Please select one of the journals below to identify the most appropriate publication platform for your work.