Studi Komparasi Jarh wa Ta’dil dengan Kajian Islam Modern
Comparative Study of Jarh wa Ta'dil with Modern Islamic Studies
Please do not hesitate to contact us if you would like to obtain more information about the submission process or if you have further questions.
Abstract
This paper investigates the comparison between Jarh wa Ta'dil and modern Islamic studies in understanding the history of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). Utilizing the theory of Islamization of knowledge proposed by Raj Ismail al-Faruqi, the researcher seeks to find a middle ground between these two disciplines. The Islamization of knowledge aims to enrich Islamic scholarship by incorporating not only pure Islamic sciences but also modern knowledge. This involves strengthening modern sciences, problem-solving methods, understanding issues, and providing solutions. Jarh wa Ta'dil, which primarily focuses on the chain of narration (sanad), and modern Islamic studies, which dominate the study of the text (matan), can be synergized and made complementary. This would create a harmonious relationship between the two scholarly approaches. In essence, the historical study of Islam will be stronger through the discipline of Jarh wa Ta'dil, ensuring the credibility of transmission validity, while interpretation will be supported by modern Islamic studies. The conclusion is that there is no need to contradict the two approaches, but rather they can mutually reinforce each other. For example, in the case of Isra' Mi'raj, Jarh wa Ta'dil is necessary to obtain the complete narrative data, which can then be analyzed with modern scientific approaches to further develop and sharpen the understanding of this spectacular miracle.
Downloads
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Afandi, Husain. (1997). al-Husūn al-Hamīdiyyah. Surabaya: Haromain.
Al-Asqallani, Ahmad bin Hajar. (1998). Fath al-Barī. Beirut: Dār al-Ma‘rifah.
Al-Auni, Syarif Hatim bin Arif. (1996). al-Mu‘amalah. Riyadh: Dar al-Hijrah.
Al-buti, Muhammad Sa‘id Romadhon. (2003). Min al-Fikr wa al-Qalb. Beirut: Dar al-Fikri\.
Al-Busti, Muhammad bin Hibban. (1396). Aleppo: Dār al-Wa‘yi.
Al-Faruqi, Raj Ismail. (2001). Islāmiyyatu al-Ma’rifah. Beirut: Dār al-Hādī.
Al-Qarrafi, Ahmad bin Idris. (1999). al-Furūq. Beirut: ‘Alamu al-Kutub.
Al-Naisaburi. (1994). al-Jāmi‘ as-Sahih. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.
Al-Naisaburi, Muhammad bin Hakim. (2002). al-Madkhal Ilā al-Iklīl, Mesir: Dār Ibn Hazm. Salih, Subhi. (2001). Ulūm al-Hadīs. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.
David, F. Norton. (1993). The Cambridge Companion to Hume. England: Cambridge University.
Haikal, Husain. (2004). Hayātu Muhammad. Beirut: Dār al-Fikri.
Ibn Malik, Muhammad bin Abdillah. (2001). al-Khulāsah. Surabaya: Haromain.
J. Neil, Salkind. (2004). An Introduction to Theories of Human Development. Amerika: Harvard.
Khaldun, Ibn. (1988). Muqaddimah. Beirut: Dār al-Fikri.
Kurdi, Dkk. (2009). Living Qur’an dan Hadis. Yogyakarta: Insani Press.
Kurdi, Dkk. (2009). Living Qur’an dan Hadis. Yogyakarta: Insani Press.
Musthafa, Agus. (1999). Terpesona di Sidratu al-Muntaha. Yogyakarta: Insani Press.
Syuhbah, Abū. (2007). al-Difā‘ ‘an al-Sunnah. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.
Zamzami, Ahmad. (2001). Ilmu Tafsir. Diedit oleh D. Beirut: Dār al-Fikri