Studi Komparasi Jarh wa Ta’dil dengan Kajian Islam Modern

Comparative Study of Jarh wa Ta'dil with Modern Islamic Studies

Page Numbers: 519-531
Published: 2024-07-12
Digital Object Identifier: 10.58578/ajisd.v2i4.3340
Save this to:
Article Metrics:
Viewed : 50 times
Downloaded : 24 times
Article can trace at:

Author Fee:
Free Publication Fees for Foreign Researchers (0.00)
Connected Papers:
Connected Papers


Please do not hesitate to contact us if you would like to obtain more information about the submission process or if you have further questions.




  • Irfan Fadllurrahman UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
  • Tajul Arifin UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Abstract

This paper investigates the comparison between Jarh wa Ta'dil and modern Islamic studies in understanding the history of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). Utilizing the theory of Islamization of knowledge proposed by Raj Ismail al-Faruqi, the researcher seeks to find a middle ground between these two disciplines. The Islamization of knowledge aims to enrich Islamic scholarship by incorporating not only pure Islamic sciences but also modern knowledge. This involves strengthening modern sciences, problem-solving methods, understanding issues, and providing solutions. Jarh wa Ta'dil, which primarily focuses on the chain of narration (sanad), and modern Islamic studies, which dominate the study of the text (matan), can be synergized and made complementary. This would create a harmonious relationship between the two scholarly approaches. In essence, the historical study of Islam will be stronger through the discipline of Jarh wa Ta'dil, ensuring the credibility of transmission validity, while interpretation will be supported by modern Islamic studies. The conclusion is that there is no need to contradict the two approaches, but rather they can mutually reinforce each other. For example, in the case of Isra' Mi'raj, Jarh wa Ta'dil is necessary to obtain the complete narrative data, which can then be analyzed with modern scientific approaches to further develop and sharpen the understanding of this spectacular miracle.

Keywords: Jarh wa Ta'dil; Comparison; Modern Studies
Share Article:

Citation Metrics:



Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
How to Cite
Fadllurrahman, I., & Arifin, T. (2024). Studi Komparasi Jarh wa Ta’dil dengan Kajian Islam Modern. Asian Journal of Islamic Studies and Da’wah, 2(4), 519-531. https://doi.org/10.58578/ajisd.v2i4.3340

References

Ad-Damanhuri, Sulaimān. (1999). Idāh al-Mubham. Surabaya: Haromain.
Afandi, Husain. (1997). al-Husūn al-Hamīdiyyah. Surabaya: Haromain.
Al-Asqallani, Ahmad bin Hajar. (1998). Fath al-Barī. Beirut: Dār al-Ma‘rifah.
Al-Auni, Syarif Hatim bin Arif. (1996). al-Mu‘amalah. Riyadh: Dar al-Hijrah.
Al-buti, Muhammad Sa‘id Romadhon. (2003). Min al-Fikr wa al-Qalb. Beirut: Dar al-Fikri\.
Al-Busti, Muhammad bin Hibban. (1396). Aleppo: Dār al-Wa‘yi.
Al-Faruqi, Raj Ismail. (2001). Islāmiyyatu al-Ma’rifah. Beirut: Dār al-Hādī.
Al-Qarrafi, Ahmad bin Idris. (1999). al-Furūq. Beirut: ‘Alamu al-Kutub.
Al-Naisaburi. (1994). al-Jāmi‘ as-Sahih. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.
Al-Naisaburi, Muhammad bin Hakim. (2002). al-Madkhal Ilā al-Iklīl, Mesir: Dār Ibn Hazm. Salih, Subhi. (2001). Ulūm al-Hadīs. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.
David, F. Norton. (1993). The Cambridge Companion to Hume. England: Cambridge University.
Haikal, Husain. (2004). Hayātu Muhammad. Beirut: Dār al-Fikri.
Ibn Malik, Muhammad bin Abdillah. (2001). al-Khulāsah. Surabaya: Haromain.
J. Neil, Salkind. (2004). An Introduction to Theories of Human Development. Amerika: Harvard.
Khaldun, Ibn. (1988). Muqaddimah. Beirut: Dār al-Fikri.
Kurdi, Dkk. (2009). Living Qur’an dan Hadis. Yogyakarta: Insani Press.
Kurdi, Dkk. (2009). Living Qur’an dan Hadis. Yogyakarta: Insani Press.
Musthafa, Agus. (1999). Terpesona di Sidratu al-Muntaha. Yogyakarta: Insani Press.
Syuhbah, Abū. (2007). al-Difā‘ ‘an al-Sunnah. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.
Zamzami, Ahmad. (2001). Ilmu Tafsir. Diedit oleh D. Beirut: Dār al-Fikri

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>