Metodologi Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal dalam Menilai Kredibilitas Perawi Hadis The Methodology of Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal in Evaluating the Credibility of Hadith Narrators

Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

The existence of the sanad in a hadith occupies a crucial position. This is because a hadith is said to be authentic if the line of transmission and the transmitter (narrator) are free from defects. The narrators here become one of the the influential ones in bringing the hadith to a high degree by looking based on intellectual andbehavioral credibility. Intellectuality is a measurable aspects, but every hadith scholar has varied criteria and methods in determining the credibility of a narrator. Imam Ahmad, as one of the leading scholars in the tradition of hadith, has a structured approach in assessing narrators who narrate traditions that are the basis of religious teachings. This article discusses and reviews in detail how Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal assesses the intellectual credibility of hadith narrators. This research uses a qualitative method with an analytical descriptive approach and data collection techniques in the form of library research. The results of this study found that the methodology used by Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal reflects wisdom, justice and balance in assessing the credibility of narrators. The method used by Imam Ahmad covers various aspects including the testimony of scholars, the compatibility of the narration with the narration of other reliable narrators, and the assessment based on the frequency of the narrator’s mistakes as well as the emphasis on written records and strong memorization also characterize Imam Ahmad’s methodology. This article provides an in-depth insight into Imam Ahmad’s approach in assessing the intellectual credibility of hadith narrators and serves as areference in the future development of evaluation in the study of hadith narration.

Keywords:
Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus



Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Scopus Citation Data

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Hasani A. (2026)
    Assess the level of adherence to nursing ethical principles among nurses at Imam Khomeini Hospital in Saqqez in 2024
    Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine, 21(1)
  2. Hassan Y.M. (2027)
    A cost-performance index for nano-optical biosensor evaluation: Systematic evaluation of europium–salicylate luminescent platforms for GPC3-targeted early HCC diagnosis
    Talanta, 311
  3. Mahran A. (2026)
    Editorial Expression of Concern: Risk factors and outcome of patients with eclampsia at a tertiary hospital in EgyptRisk factors and outcome of patients with eclampsia at a tertiary hospital in Egypt(BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, (2023), 23, (611), 10.1186/s12884-023-05935-5)
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 26(1)

Article Details

How to Cite
Azzahra, A. N., & Arifin, T. (2024). Metodologi Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal dalam Menilai Kredibilitas Perawi Hadis. Asian Journal of Islamic Studies and Da’wah, 2(4), 300-315. https://doi.org/10.58578/ajisd.v2i4.3139

Explore Our Journals
Find the most suitable journal for your research. If this journal does not fully align with the scope of your manuscript, we invite you to explore our wider portfolio of journals covering diverse fields of study. Please select one of the journals below to identify the most appropriate publication platform for your work.

Most read articles by the same author(s)