Penggunaan Kitab-kitab Rijal dalam Penilaian Periwayat Hadis Usage of the Books of Rijal in the Evaluation of Hadith Narrators

Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

Rijal books play an essential role in hadith studies by providing detailed information on the biographies and evaluations of hadith narrators. Through this literature, hadith scholars can assess the reliability and credibility of narrators, which helps determine the authenticity of the hadiths they transmit. This article explores the methodology in rijal books, their relevance in contemporary hadith studies, and the challenges they face in the modern context. The methodologies used include sanad criticism, compiling the biographies of narrators, and evaluating reputations based on scholars' testimonies. Sanad criticism ensures the continuity and trustworthiness of the transmission chain, while narrator biographies provide a comprehensive view of the narrators' lives, education, and activities. Reputation evaluation gathers opinions from scholars who know the narrators. The use of rijal books remains relevant in hadith verification, sanad criticism, hadith education, and academic research. They also offer insights into the social, political, and cultural contexts of the narrators, which are crucial for interpreting hadiths in the modern context. However, there are several challenges in their use, including limited information, the influence of historical context, and the need to integrate modern methodologies. Digital technology offers broader access but also raises challenges of validity and reliability of information. Major rijal books such as Al-Tarikh al-Kabir by Imam al-Bukhari and Al-Jam'u Bayna Rijal al-Shahihayn by Ibn Qirani, as well as other works like Ushul al-Ghabah Fi Ma’rifatil Asma’is Shahabah and Al-Thabaqat al-Kubra, make significant contributions to hadith studies. By understanding the methodologies and challenges in using rijal books, we can better appreciate the complexity and importance of hadith studies in the Islamic tradition. These books remain an important reference for anyone wishing to delve into hadith science and ensure the authenticity and validity of hadith chains.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Ghafar N.M.A. (2026)
    A CONSUMPTION-BASED EVALUATION OF RETIREMENT SAVINGS ADEQUACY IN MALAYSIA
    Journal of Quality Measurement and Analysis, 22(S1), 145-162
  2. Rahman Z.A. (2026)
    Strengthening Islamic Governance Through the Application of the Kano Model: A Case Study of the UMI Principles in Kelantan
    Journal of Quality Measurement and Analysis, 22(S1), 381-393
  3. Duan W. (2026)
    Evaluating Machine Translation of the Shan Hai Jing: An MQM-Based Analysis of Google Translate vs. ChatGPT with Prompting Effects
    Gema Online Journal of Language Studies, 26(2), 404-426

Article Details

How to Cite
Azzami, A., & Arifin, T. (2024). Penggunaan Kitab-kitab Rijal dalam Penilaian Periwayat Hadis. Asian Journal of Islamic Studies and Da’wah, 2(4), 505-518. https://doi.org/10.58578/ajisd.v2i4.3316

References

Almunadi, A. (2018). POLA KAJIAN HADIS AKADEMIK DI PERGURUAN TINGGI KEAGAMAAN: Studi Terhadap Skripsi Mahasiswa Tafsir Hadis Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Pemikiran Islam UIN Raden Fatah Palembang Tahun 1995-2016. Jurnal Ilmu Agama: Mengkaji Doktrin, Pemikiran, dan Fenomena Agama, 19(1).
Kamaruddin, P. H. (2009). Metode Kritik Hadis. Hikmah.
Muliadi A, M. A. (2014). Kontribusi Ibnu H {Ajar Al-‘Asqala> Ni> tentang Tadli<<<> S di dalam Kitab Tabaqa< T Al-Mudallisi< N (Doctoral dissertation, Pascasarjana UIN-SU).
SYAHRONI, A. REINTERPRETASI HADIS PLURALITAS AGAMA DALAM MUSNAD IMA< M AH {M AD NOMOR INDEKS 23842.
Saʿd, I. (1957). الطبقات الكبرى. (No Title).
ابن الاثير، علي بن محمد،. (1863). اسد الغابة فى معرفة الصحابة (Vol. 5). جمعية المعارف المصرية.‎
بخاري، محمد بن إسماعيل. (1941). كتاب التاريخ الكبير (Vol. 3, No. 2). مطبعة جمعية دائرة المعارف العثمانية،.‎
محمد بن طاهر بن علي بن أحمد الشيباني، المقدسي، الحنبلي، الصوفي، أبو الفضل، ابن القيسراني، ابن طاهر، المحدّث، النسابة، المتكلّم، المؤرخ. الجمع بين رجال الصحيحين.‎
أحمد بن علي بن حجر العسقلاني. (1854). تقريب التهذيب. ktab INC..‎

Most read articles by the same author(s)