Cloning in Plants and Animals: Divergent Pathways and Ethical Boundaries in Biotechnology
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
278-285
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ajbmbr.v2i2.6140
Viewed: 1.154 times
Downloaded: 238 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:Muhammad Akram1, Isaac John Umaru2, Nosheen Aslam3, Mohammed Khudhair Hasan4, Hind A. Abdulghafoor5, Fahad Said Khan6, Fethi Ahmet Ozdemir7, Gaweł Sołowski8, Jaouher Ben Ali9, Jehan Mohammed Al-Musawi10, Abid Mahmood11
Copyright :Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
The creation of genetically identical creatures by cloning is essential to contemporary biotechnology, agriculture, and medical research. Although the basic idea of cloning is the same in all kingdoms, there are substantial differences between plants and animals in terms of its use, effectiveness, and moral consequences. Cloning is a common, natural occurrence in plants and is frequently accomplished using asexual reproduction procedures such as tissue culture, grafting, and vegetative propagation. Because plant cells are highly totipotent, practically any somatic cell may grow again into a whole organism given the right circumstances. The production of genetically engineered plants with enhanced features, the preservation of uncommon species, and the large-scale multiplication of genetically uniform crops have all been made easier by this regenerative potential. Animal cloning, on the other hand, poses far more biological and technological difficulties. Due to developmental errors, aberrant gene expression, and insufficient reprogramming of the donor nucleus, this procedure usually has poor success rates and necessitates intricate management. It brings up important issues about biodiversity, animal care, and the ethical ramifications of cloning sentient creatures. Furthermore, animal cloning is more closely regulated and scrutinized by the public than plant cloning, which is generally recognized in agricultural operations and conservation initiatives. This is particularly true when it comes to food production and possible human cloning. The difference in the effectiveness and uses of cloning is mostly explained by the difference in totipotency between plant and animal cells. The accuracy of modification is becoming closer thanks to recent technological advancements like CRISPR-Cas9, yet the ethical and practical possibilities of cloning in these two domains are still not comparable. The intricate relationship between biological viability, technical development, and societal acceptability of interspecies cloning is shown by this comparative study. Guidance on the proper application and control of cloning technologies in biomedicine and agriculture depends on an understanding of these distinctions.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles
-
Edwin E. (2027)Inflammation-driven multiorgan Dysfunction: Biomarker-Guided diagnosis, mechanistic insights and emerging precision therapeutic strategiesAdvances in Biomarker Sciences and Technology, 9(1), 1-25
-
Wu G. (2027)Sedimentary facies modeling driven by morphodynamic sedimentary simulation under sparse-well conditionsUnconventional Resources, 17
-
Chowdhury S. (2027)EFFICACY OF BIOPESTICIDES ON EGG HATCHABILITY AND ADULT MORTALITY OF TETRANYCHUS MACFARLANEI BAKER AND PRITCHARDIndian Journal of Entomology, 89(1), 166-171
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Kärenlampi, S., Schat, H., Vangronsveld, J., Verkleij, J. A., van der Lelie, D., Mergeay, M., & Tervahauta, A. I. (2000). Genetic Engineering in the Improvement of Plants for Phytoremediation of Metal Polluted Soils. Environmental Pollution, 107(2), 225–231.
Mesén, F., Newton, A. C., & Leakey, R. R. (1997). Vegetative Propagation of Cordia alliodora (Ruiz & Pavon) Oken: The Effects of IBA Concentration, Propagation Medium and Cutting Origin. Forest Ecology and Management, 92(1–3), 45–54.
Rossi, S., Hallett, M., Rossini, P. M., Pascual-Leone, A., & Safety of TMS Consensus Group. (2009). Safety, Ethical Considerations, and Application Guidelines for the Use of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Clinical Practice and Research. Clinical Neurophysiology, 120(12), 2008–2039.
Stice, S. L., Robl, J. M., De Leon, F. P., Jerry, J., Golueke, P. G., Cibelli, J. B., & Kane, J. J. (1998). Cloning: New Breakthroughs Leading to Commercial Opportunities. Theriogenology, 49(1), 129–138.